Advertisement

Space, Place, Common Wounds and Boundaries: Insider/Outsider Debates in Research with Black Women and Deaf Women

  • Chijioke Obasi
Reference work entry

Abstract

The chapter discusses issues of identity in research. It does this by examining the impacts of the identity of the researcher, participants, and the various identity interchanges that take place. This chapter draws on the perspectives and experiences of participants and researcher in a PhD study with five (Six Deaf women were interviewed but one withdrew due to a conflict of interest.) culturally Deaf (white) women and 25 Black (hearing) women discussing their world of work in UK public sector organizations. The theoretical framework of “Africanist Sista-hood in Britain” is that which underpins the positioning of the research and researcher. The chapter provides a reflexive account of the research but in a way that centralizes participant perspectives. Two goals have been achieved; firstly, it adds further contribution to the insider/outsider debate by adding participant perspectives on the issue, and secondly, it demonstrates the ways in which the theoretical framework of “Africanist Sista-hood in Britain” can be used in research not just with Black women but also via collaborative approaches with other social groups. In so doing, the chapter raises a number of important questions: Should researchers seek out participant perspectives on the insider/outsider debates in research? In what ways does the identity interchange between researcher and researched have an impact on the research process? What does Africanist Sista-hood in Britain have to offer to Black women and others carrying out research in the field?

Keywords

Insider/outsider research Black women Deaf women Africanist Sista-hood Black feminism Womanism Africana womanism Deaf research 

References

  1. Andersen ML. Studying across difference: race, class and gender in qualitative research. In: Stanfield JH, Dennis RM, editors. Race and ethnicity in research methods. London: SAGE; 1993. p. 39–52.Google Scholar
  2. Anthias F. Nation and post-nation: nationalism, transnationalism and intersections of belonging. In: Collins PH, Solomos J, editors. The Sage handbook of race and ethnic studies. London: SAGE; 2010. p. 221–48.Google Scholar
  3. Atewologun D, Singh V. Challenging ethnic and gender identities: an exploration of UK black professionals’ identity construction. Equal Divers Incl Int J. 2010;29:332–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahan B. On the formation of a visual variety of the human race. In: Bauman H-DL, editor. Open your eyes: deaf studies talking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2008. p. 83–9.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman H-D. Introduction-listening to deaf studies. In: Bauman H-DL, editor. Open your eyes deaf studies talking. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press; 2008. p. 1–32.Google Scholar
  6. Bauman H-DL, Murray JJ. Deaf gain: an introduction. In: Bauman H-DL, Murray JJ, editors. Deaf gain raising the stakes for human diversity. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press; 2014a. p. xv–xiii.Google Scholar
  7. Bauman H-DL, Murray JJ. Deaf gain raising the stakes for human diversity. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press; 2014b.Google Scholar
  8. Biernacki P, Waldorf D. Snowball sapmpling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Soc Methods Res. 1981;10(2):141–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brayboy BM. The Indian and the researcher: tales from the field. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 2000;13(4):415–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brayboy B, Deyhle D. Insider-outsider: researchers in American Indian communities. Theory Pract. 2000;39(3):163–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Browne K. Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charles H. The language of womanism: rethinking difference. In: Safia Mirza H, editor. Black British feminism: a reader. London: Routledge; 1997. p. 278–97.Google Scholar
  13. Collins PH. What’s in a name? Womanism, black feminism and beyond. Black Sch. 1996;26:9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins PH. Fighting words: black women & the search for justice. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  15. Collins PH. Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London: Routledge; 2000.Google Scholar
  16. Collins PH, Solomos J. Introduction: situating race and ethnic studies. In: Collins PH, Solomos J, editors. The Sage handbook of race and ethnic studies. London: SAGE; 2010. p. 1–21.Google Scholar
  17. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. London: SAGE; 2013.Google Scholar
  18. Crotty M. The foundations of social research. London: SAGE; 1998.Google Scholar
  19. Davis A. Black women and the academy. In: Bobo J, Hudley C, Michel C, editors. The black studies reader. New York: Routledge; 2004.Google Scholar
  20. Dean J. Whose afraid of third wave feminism? Int Femin J Polit. 2009;11(3):334–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eckert, R. C.. Deafnicity: a study of strategic and adaptive responses to audism by members of the Deaf American community of cultrure. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 2005.Google Scholar
  22. Eckert RC. Towards a theory of deaf ethnos: Deafnicity~ D/deaf. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2010;15(4):317–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Faugier J, Sargeant M. Sampling hard to reach populations. J Adv Nurs. 1997;26:790–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fawcett B, Hearn J. Researching others: epistemology, expereience, standpoints and participation. Int J Soc Methodol. 2004;7(3):201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gair S. Feeling their stories: contemplating empathy, insider/outsider positionings, and enriching qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(1):134–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gibbs G. Analyzing qualitative data. London: SAGE; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gibson WJ, Brown A. Working with qualitative data. London: Sage; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gordon G. Towards bicultural competence- beyond black and white. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books; 2007.Google Scholar
  29. Guest G, Macqueen KM, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis. London: SAGE; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hole R. Narratives of identity a poststructuralist analysis of three deaf women’s life stories. Narrat Inq. 2007a;17:259–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hole R. Working between language and cultures issues of representation, voice and authority intensified. Qual Inq. 2007b;13(5):696–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hooks b. Feminist theory from the margin to the center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press; 1984.Google Scholar
  33. Innes RA. “Wait a second who are you anyways?”: the insider/outsider debate and American Indian studies. Am Indian Q. 2009;33(4):440–61.Google Scholar
  34. Jain D, Turner C. Purple is to lavender: womanism, resistance, and the politic of naming. Negro Educ Rev. 2012;62 & 63(1–4):67–88.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson-Bailey J. The ties that bind and the shackles that separate: race, gender, class, and color in a research process. J Q Stud Educ. 1999;12(6):659–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ladd P. Understanding deaf culture: in search of Deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters; 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ladd P. Colonialism and resistance: a brief history of deafhood. In: Bauman H-DL, editor. Open your eyes deaf studies talking. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota; 2008. p. 42–59.Google Scholar
  38. Lane H. Ethnicity, ethics and the deaf-world. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005;10(3):291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liamputtong P. Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liamputtong P. Focus group methodology: principles and practice. London: Sage; 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  42. Maylor U. What is the meaning of ‘black’? Researching ‘black’ respondents. Ethnic Racial Stud. 2009;32(2):369–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Merriam SB, Johnson-Bailey J, Ming-Yeh L, Youngwha K, Ntseane G, Muhamad M. Power and positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. Int J Lifelong Educ. 2001;20(5):405–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Merton R. Insider and outsider: a chapter in sociology of knowledge. Am J Sociol. 1972;78(1): 9–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mirza HS. Introduction: mapping a genealogy of black British feminism. In: Mirza HS, editor. Black British feminism a reader. London: Routledge; 1997.Google Scholar
  46. Mullings B. Insider or outsider, both or neither: some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum. 1999;30:337–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Najarian CG. “Between worlds”: deaf women, work, and intersections of gender and ability. London: Routledge; 2006.Google Scholar
  48. Obasi C. Seeing the deaf in “deafness”. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008;13(4):455–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Obasi C. Race and ethnicity in sign language interpreter education, training and practice. Race Ethn Educ. 2013;16(1):103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Obasi C. Negotiating the insider/outsider continua: a black female hearing perspective on research with deaf women and black women. Qual Res. 2014;14(1):61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Obasi, C. “The visible invisibles”: exploring the perspectives and experiences of Black women and Deaf women of equality and diversity in the public sector through the prism of Africanist Sista-hood in Britain. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Central Lancashire, England. 2016a.Google Scholar
  52. Obasi, C. ‘Africanist sista-hood in Britain’: Debating black feminism, womanism and Africana womanism. In: Paper presented at the women of colour conference Black Feiminism, Womanism and the Politics of Women of Colour in Europe. University of Edinburgh 3 Sept 2016. 2016b.Google Scholar
  53. Ochieng B. You know what I mean: the ethical and methodological dilemmas and challenges for black researchers interviewing black families. Qual Health Res. 2010;20(12):1725–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Padden C, Humphries T. Inside deaf culture. London: Harvard University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  55. Patton MQ. 2015. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 4th edn. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  56. Reynolds T. Re-thinking a black feminist standpoint. Ethn Racial Stud. 2002;25(4):591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Serrant-Green L. Black on black: methodological issues for black reserearchers working in minority ethinic communities. Nurse Res. 2002;9(4):30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Serry T, Liamputtong P. The in-depth interviewing method in health. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 67–83.Google Scholar
  59. Springer K. Third wave black feminism? Signs J Women Cult Soc. 2002;27(41):1059–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stone C, West D. Translation, representation and the deaf ‘voice’. Qual Res. 2012;12(6):645–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sturgis P. Designing samples. In: Gilbert N, editor. Researching social life. 3rd ed. England: London; 2008. p. 165–81.Google Scholar
  62. Sue DW, Capodilupo CM, Torino GC, Bucceri JM, Holder AMB, Nadal KL, Esquilin M. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice. Am Psychol. 2007;62(4):271–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Suwankhong D, Liamputtong P. Cultural insiders and research fieldwork: case examples from cross-cultural research with Thai people. Int J Qual Methods. 2015;  https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Temple B, Young A. Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qual Res. 2004;4(2):161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walker A. In search of our mothers’ gardens. New York: Harcourt, Bruce Jovanovich; 1983.Google Scholar
  66. Willis JW. Foundations of qualitative research, interpretive and critical approaches. London: SAGE; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Woodward J. Implications for sociolinguistics research among the deaf. Sign Lang Stud. 1972;1: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Young L. What is black British feminism? Women Cult Rev. 2000;11:45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Young AA Jr. Experiences in ethnographic interviewing about race: the inside and outside of it. In: Bulmer J, Solomos J, editors. Researching race and racism. London: Routledge; 2004. p. 87–202.Google Scholar
  70. Young A, Hunt R. Research with deaf people. London: London School of Economics and Political Science; 2011.Google Scholar
  71. Young A, Temple B. Approaches to social research: the case of deaf studies. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK

Personalised recommendations