Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences pp 1403-1416 | Cite as
Cell Phone Survey
The global rise in cell phones usage has undermined traditional data collection modes, notably landline surveys, and has elicited the development of novel survey methods and designs. Adopting a single landline frame survey is no longer viable, owing to its undesirable implications on response rate, coverage, as well as data representativeness and validity. Subsequently, researchers have developed methods to integrate the cell phone and landline frames, and conduct “dual frame” surveys using either overlapping or nonoverlapping modes of integration. Dual frame surveys have gained popularity as they were shown to enhance the quality of the collected data and improve the validity of national estimates. Of course, cell phone surveys, be it single frame or dual frame, are not void of methodological challenges relevant to sampling frames, participant selection, respondent burden, and collection of reliable and valid data. The evidence concerning the proper implementation of cell phone surveys, as well as the feasibility of a single frame cell phone survey is relatively recent especially when youth are the targeted population. Given their proliferation worldwide and the diminishing existing barriers, cell phones are expected to become an inevitable mode for collecting health survey data. Yet, the need remains for contextualizing their feasibility as per each country’s settings and circumstances.
KeywordsCell phones Telephone Bias epidemiology Validity Feasibility
- Babor TF, Brown J, Delboca FK. Validity of self-reports in applied-research on addictive behaviors – fact or fiction. Behav Assess. 1990;12(1):5–31.Google Scholar
- Barr ML. Predicting when declining landline frame coverage will impact on the overall health estimates for the NSW Population Health Survey. 2008. Retrieved from http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/surveys/other/Documents/predicting-when-mobile-only-impacts-2008.pdf.
- Barr ML, Van Ritten JJ, Steel DG, Thackway SV. Inclusion of mobile phone numbers into an ongoing population health survey in new South Wales, Australia: design, methods, call outcomes, costs and sample representativeness. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:177. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barr ML, Ferguson RA, Hughes PJ, Steel DG. Developing a weighting strategy to include mobile phone numbers into an ongoing population health survey using an overlapping dual-frame design with limited benchmark information2. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014a;14:102. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Best J. First-stage weights for overlapping dual frame telephone surveys. In: Paper presented at the 65th annual conference of the American Association of Public Opinion Research. Chicago; 2010.Google Scholar
- Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Wireless substitution: early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, Jan–June 2010. National Center for Health Statistics, 201(3). 2010. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless201005.pdf.
- Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Wireless substitution: early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, July–Dec 2013. 2014. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Wireless-Substitution-Early-Release-of-Estimates-Blumberg-Luke/1cb29f663f0419d8ef7a4e742ee8e1bad1e3f7eb/pdf.
- Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Davidson G, Davern ME, Yu TC, Soderberg K. Wireless substitution: state-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January-December 2007. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2009;14:1–13.Google Scholar
- Busse B, Fuchs M. Prevalence of cell phone sharing. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field (SMIF); 2013. http://surveyinsights.org/?p=1019.
- De Leeuw ED. Choosing the method of data collection. In: de Leeuw D, Hox JJ, Dillman DA, editors. International handbook of survey methodology. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008. p. 113–35.Google Scholar
- Groves RM, Kahn RL. Surveys by telephone: a national comparison with personal interviews. New York: Academic; 1979.Google Scholar
- Guterbock T, Peytchev A, Rexrode D. Cell-phone costs revisited: understanding cost and productivity ratios in dual-frame telephone surveys. In: Paper presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference. Boston; 2013.Google Scholar
- Keeter S, Dimock M, Christian L. Calling cell phones in’08 pre-election polls. The Pew Research Center for the people & the Press. 2008. Retrieved 18 Dec 2008.Google Scholar
- Kuusela V, Callegaro M, Vehovar V. The influence of mobile telephones on telephone surveys. In: Lepkowski JM, Tucker C, Brick JM, et al., editors. Advances in telephone survey methodology. New York: Wiley; 2008. p. 87–112.Google Scholar
- Lesser VM, Kalsbeek WD. Non-sampling error in surveys. New York: Wiley; 1992.Google Scholar
- Massey JT, O’Connor D, Krotki K. Response rates in random digit dialing (RDD) telephone surveys. In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods; 1997.Google Scholar
- Schofield M, Forrester-Knauss C. Surveys and questionnaires in health research. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 235–56.Google Scholar
- Sibai AM, Ghandour LA, Chaaban R, Mokdad AH. Potential use of telephone surveys for non-communicable disease surveillance in developing countries: evidence from a national household survey in Lebanon. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0160-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Steeh C. A new era for telephone surveys. In: Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. Phoenix; 2004.Google Scholar
- The American Association for Public Opinion Research. New considerations for survey researchers when planning and conducting RDD telephone surveys in the US with respondents reached via cell phone numbers. Deerfield: American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2010.Google Scholar
- The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions. Final dispositions of case Codes and outcome rates for surveys. 2011. Retrieved: https://www.esomar.org/uploads/public/knowledge-and-standards/codes-and-guidelines/ESOMAR_Standard-Definitions-Final-Dispositions-of-Case-Codes-and-Outcome-Rates-for-Surveys.pdf.
- World Bank. World development indicators. 2013. Retrieved from: http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/WDI-2013-ebook.pdf.