Advertisement

Eliciting Expert Practitioner Knowledge Through Pedagogy and Infographics

  • Robert H. CampbellEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

Qualitative research routinely requires expert practitioner knowledge to be elicited. However, effectively eliciting tacit or implicit knowledge can be problematic. This chapter presents a method in which pedagogy and infographics were combined to elicit the knowledge of expert professionals. During interlocutions, using a progressive series of infographics accompanied by explanations, research participants were quickly taught new topics. Then as the learning occurred, they were asked to reflect on their experience using their new knowledge as a lens. Deployed with Information Systems practitioners, the approach was effective, bringing forth 130,000 words of relevant and advanced discourse. Although details of the Information Systems research are presented in the chapter as an illustration, the chapter’s foci are the method’s underpinning principles and deployment. It is believed that this approach could be easily transferred into a range of qualitative research domains. Given the ambiguity surrounding the term, the concepts of expert and expertise are also discussed along with the challenge of establishing definitions for a given domain.

Keywords

Expert Expertise Expert knowledge elicitation Pedagogy Infographics Information systems practitioners Information systems research Qualitative research 

References

  1. Aronson E. Dissonance theory: progress and problems. In: Abelson RP, Aronson E, McGuire WJ, Newcomb TM, Rosenberg MJ, Tannenbaum PH, editors. Theories of cognitive consistency: a sourcebook. Chicago: R& McNally; 1968. p. 5–27.Google Scholar
  2. Aronson E. Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. In: Harmon-Jones E, Mills J, editors. Cognitive dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999. p. 103–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson E, Mills J. The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1959;59:177–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Axsom D, Cooper J. Cognitive dissonance and psychotherapy: the role of effort justification in inducing weight loss. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1985;21:149–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babbie E. The practice of social research. 14th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2016.Google Scholar
  6. BBC. The woman who lived. Dr Who. The British Broadcasting Corporation. 2015.Google Scholar
  7. Beauvois JL, Joule RV. A radical dissonance theory. London: Taylor and Francis; 1996.Google Scholar
  8. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brehm JW. Post decision changes in the desirability of alternatives. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1956;52:384–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper J, Fazio RH. A new look at dissonance theory. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 17. Orlando: Academic; 1984. p. 229–64.Google Scholar
  11. Cote J, Ericsson KA, Law MP. Tracing the development of athletes using retrospective interview methods: a proposed interview and validation procedure for reported information. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2005;17:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Draycott S, Dabbs A. Cognitive dissonance: an overview of the literature and its integration into theory and practice of clinical psychology. Br J Clin Psychol. 1998;37:341–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Rev ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  14. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100:393–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1957.Google Scholar
  16. Festinger L, Carlsmith JM. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1959;58(2):203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Germain M. Stages of scale development and validation: the example of the generalized expertise measure (GEM). Columbus: Academy of Human Resource Development; 2006.Google Scholar
  18. Germain M, Ruiz CE. Expertise: myth or reality of a cross-national definition? J Eur Ind Train. 2009;33(7):614–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gladwell M. Outliers: the story of success. New York: Little, Brown and Company; 2008.Google Scholar
  20. Gobet F, Campitelli G. The role of domain-specific practice, handedness and starting age in chess. Dev Psychol. 2007;43:159–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hair JF, Bush RP, Ortinau DJ. Marketing research: a practical approach for the new millennium. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill; 2000.Google Scholar
  23. Harmon-Jones E, Harmon-Jones C. Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Z Sozialpsychol. 2007;38:7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoffman RR, Shadbolt NR, Burton AM, Klein G. Eliciting knowledge from experts: a methodological analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1995;62(2):129–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kidd AL, editor. Knowledge acquisition for expert systems: a practical handbook. New York: Plenum Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  26. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1984.Google Scholar
  27. Leonard D, Swap WC. Deep smarts: how to cultivate and transfer enduring business wisdom. Boston: Harvard Business School Publications; 2005.Google Scholar
  28. Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  29. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL. A call for qualitative power analyses: quality & quantity. Int J Met. 2007;41:105–21.Google Scholar
  30. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer; 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sakai H. A multiplicative power-function model of cognitive dissonance: toward an integrated theory of cognition, emotion, and behavior after Leon Festinger. In: Harmon-Jones E, Mills J, editors. Cognitive dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999. p. 267–94.Google Scholar
  32. Simon L, Greenberg J, Brehm JW. Trivialization: the forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;68:247–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steele CM. The psychology of self-affirmation: sustaining the integrity of the self. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 21. San Diego: Academic; 1988. p. 261–302.Google Scholar
  34. Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey: Brooks-Cole; 1979. p. 33–47.Google Scholar
  35. Wicklund RA, Brehm JW. Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of BoltonBoltonUK

Personalised recommendations