Advertisement

Optimizing Interviews with Children and Youth with Disability

  • Gail Teachman
Reference work entry

Abstract

While there is a growing body of literature explicitly outlining methods for interview studies with children, few have focused on engaging children with disabilities. This chapter describes innovative techniques, strategies, and methods for engaging disabled children and youth in qualitative interviews. A child interview methodological approach is described with an emphasis on three key elements: assembling a range of customizable interview methods; partnering with parents; and consideration of the power differential inherent in child–researcher interactions. Drawn from the author’s research, examples are used to illustrate the methods and discuss how they were adjusted as the research unfolded. The methods and strategies discussed in the chapter might equally inform interview research with participants of all ages and abilities.

Keywords

Child Disability Interviews Qualitative research Youth 

References

  1. Aldiss S. What is important to young children who have cancer while in hospital? Child Soc. 2009;23:85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes C. Disability, cultural representation and language. Crit Public Health. 1995;6(2):9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barter C, Renold E. The use of vignettes in qualitative research. Soc Res Update. 1999;25(9):1–6. Retrieved from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU25.htmlGoogle Scholar
  4. Barter C, Renold E. ‘I wanna tell you a story’: exploring the application of vignettes in qualitative research with children and young people. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2000;3(4):307–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broeckelmann P. Exploring consumers’ reactions towards innovative mobile services. Qual Mark Res Int J. 2010;13(4):414–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Catterall M, Ibbotson P. Using projective techniques in education research. Br Educ Res J. 2000;26(2):245–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen P, Prout A. Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood. 2002;9(4):477–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen PH. Children’s participation in ethnographic research: issues of power and representation. Child Soc. 2004;18(2):165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen P, Monrad, James A. Research with children: perspectives and practices. New York, NY: Routledge; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danby S, Ewing L, Thorpe K. The novice researcher: interviewing young children. Qual Inq. 2011;17(1):74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Docherty S, Sandelowski M. Focus on qualitative methods: interviewing children. Res Nurs Health. 1999;22(2):177–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doherty S, Nelson R. Using projective techniques to tap into consumers’ feelings, perceptions and attitudes…getting an honest opinion. Int J Consum Stud. 2010;34(4):400–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drew S, Duncan R, Sawyer S. Visual storytelling: a beneficial but challenging method for health research with young people. Qual Health Res. 2010;20:1677–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eakin J, Robertson A, Poland B, Coburn D, Edwards R. Towards a critical social science perspective on health promotion research. Health Promot Int. 1996;11(2):157–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Epstein I, Stevens B, McKeever P, Baruchel S, Jones H. Using puppetry to elicit children’s talk for research. Nurs Inq. 2008;15(1):49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernqvist S. (inter)active interviewing in childhood research: on children’s identity work in interviews. Qual Rep. 2010;15(6):1309–27.Google Scholar
  17. Finch J. The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology. 1987;21(1):105–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibson BE, Teachman G. Critical approaches in physical therapy research: investigating the symbolic value of walking. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28(6):474–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibson BE, Teachman G, Wright V, Fehlings D, Young NL, McKeever P. Children’s and parents’ beliefs regarding the value of walking: rehabilitation implications for children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38(1):61–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guillemin M. Understanding illness: using drawings as a research method. Qual Health Res. 2004;14:272–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Irwin LG, Johnson J. Interviewing young children: explicating our practices and dilemmas. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:821–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jager J, Ryan V. Evaluating clinical practice: using play-based techniques to elicit children’s views of therapy. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007;12(2):437–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. James A, Prout A. A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In: James A, Prout A, editors. Constructing and reconstructing childhood: contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London: Falmer Press; 1997. p. 7–33.Google Scholar
  24. Kirk S. Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44:1250–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kortesluoma R, Hentinen M, Nikkonen M. Conducting a qualitative child interview: methodological considerations. Methodol Issues Nurs Res. 2003;42(5):434–41.Google Scholar
  26. MacDonald J, Gagnon A, Mitchell C, Di Meglio G, Rennick J, Cox J. Include them and they will tell you: learnings from a participatory process with youth. Qual Health Res. 2011;21:1127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacDonald K, Greggans A. Dealing with chaos and complexity: the reality of interviewing children and families in their own homes. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(23):3123–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miles MB. New methods for qualitative data collection and analysis: vignettes and pre-structured cases. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 1990;3(1):37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moore T, McArthur M, Noble-Carr D. Little voices and big ideas: lessons learned from children about research. Int J Qual Methods. 2008;7(2):77–91. Retrieved from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/1941/1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morris J. Impairment and disability: constructing an ethics of care that promotes human rights. Hypatia. 2001;16(4):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb00750.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morrow V. Using qualitative methods to elicit young people’s perspectives on their environments: some ideas for community health initiatives. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(3):255–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nicholas D, Picone G, Selkirk E. The lived experiences of children and adolescents with end-stage renal disease. Qual Health Res. 2011;21:162–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Punch S. Research with children: the same or different from research with adults? Childhood. 2002;9(3):321–41.Google Scholar
  34. Teachman, G. (2006). Becoming a writer: Social constructions of writing from children with cerebral palsy (Masters dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (AATMR2114).Google Scholar
  35. Teachman G, Gibson BE. Children and youth with disabilities: innovative methods for single qualitative interviews. Qual Health Res. 2013;23(2):264–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Warburton T. Cartoons and teachers: mediated visual images as data. In: Prosser J, editor. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London: Falmer; 1998. p. 235–54.Google Scholar
  37. Wilks T. The use of vignettes in qualitative research into social work values. Qual Soc Work. 2004;3(1):78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations