Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences pp 1051-1067 | Cite as
Appraising Mixed Methods Research
There is increasing interest in the use of mixed methods research approaches among health researchers. While mixed methods research has the potential to reveal rich data and deeper understandings of complex phenomena, it needs to be evaluated with the same level of critical appraisal as other methodologies. To date, however, much of the discourse around the critical appraisal of mixed methods research has discussed the challenges and considerations underlying critical appraisal. There has been limited agreement reached on optimal methods of evaluating this body of literature. This chapter will synthesize the literature on critically appraising mixed methods research and provide advice to those reviewing mixed methods papers around considerations in critical appraisal for this type of research.
KeywordsMixed methods research Critical appraisal Methodological quality Reporting quality
- Andrew S, Halcomb EJ, editors. Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.Google Scholar
- Ashley C, Halcomb E, Brown A, Peters K. Exploring the reasons why nurses transition from acute care to primary health care: a mixed methods study. Appl Nurs Res. in press-a. Accepted 4 Sept 2017.Google Scholar
- Ashley C, Peters K, Brown A, Halcomb E. Reflections on transitioning and future career intentions of experienced nurses new to primary health care nursing. J Nurs Manag. in press-b. Accepted 14 Nov 2017.Google Scholar
- Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011.Google Scholar
- Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2018.Google Scholar
- Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2007.Google Scholar
- Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP checklists. 2017. Retrieved from http://www.casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists.
- Fàbregues S, Paré M-H, Meneses J. Operationalizing and conceptualizing quality in mixed methods research: a multiple case study of the disciplines of education, nursing, psychology, and sociology. J Mixed Methods Res, online early. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817751774
- Greene JC. Mixed methods in social inquiry, vol. 9. San Francisco: Wiley; 2007.Google Scholar
- Onwuegbuzie AJ, Johnson RB. The validity issue in mixed research. Res Schools. 2006;13(1): 48–63.Google Scholar
- Pluye P, Robert E, Cargo M, Bartlett G, O’Cathain A, Griffiths F, Boardman F, Gagnon MP, Rousseau MC. Proposal: a mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. 2011. Retrieved from http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com.
- Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: calling for an integrative framework. In M. M. Bergman (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008. p. 101–19.Google Scholar
- Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2009.Google Scholar