Advertisement

Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS) to Assist Data Analyses

  • Pat Bazeley
Reference work entry

Abstract

Qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) has much to offer the health researcher. Software facilitates efficient management of qualitative and mixed methods data through a variety of tools to organize and keep track of multiple data sources and types and of the ideas flowing from those data. Coding tools provide structure to the categories and themes evidenced in the data, allowing for rapid retrieval of information. Increased depth and rigor of analysis are facilitated through capacity to search and interrogate the data sources using a combination of coding and other data management tools. Questions can be asked about how often and how different categories or themes are expressed by different groups within a sample or within different contexts or times. Similarly, experiential data might be compared for those with different measures on health-related variables. Relationships between different aspects of experience (or attitudes or feelings, etc.) can be explored and/or verified using coding queries, through a range of visual displays, or through statistical analyses using exported coding information. Such queries can be limited to one type of data, or multiple types of sources can be imported, coded, and analyzed together. Linking tools are used throughout to connect reflective thoughts to the data that prompted them or interim results to the evidence that supports them. Explanations of these processes are illustrated by figures and examples.

Keywords

Qualitative Software Analysis Mixed methods Coding Visualizing Theory building 

References

  1. Adams NA. A crowd content analysis assembly line: scaling up hand-coding with text units of analysis. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). 2016. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2808731.
  2. Bazeley P. Qualitative data analysis: practical strategies. London: Sage; 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Bazeley P, Jackson K. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2013.Google Scholar
  4. Bowers BJ. Grounded theory. In: Sarter B, editor. Paths to knowledge: innovative research methods for nursing, vol. 15–2233. New York: National League for Nursing; 1989. p. 33–59.Google Scholar
  5. Carcary M. The research audit trail – enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2009;7(1):11–24.Google Scholar
  6. Gilbert LS. Going the distance: ‘closeness’ in qualitative data analysis software. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2002;5(3):215–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, … Smid H. How should we define health? Br Med J. 2011;343(d4163):1–3.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jackson K. Where qualitative researchers and technologies meet: lessons from interactive digital art. Qual Inq. in press.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417731086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liamputtong P. Health, illness and well-being: an introduction to social determinants of health. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Social determinants of health: individuals, society and healthcare. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; in press.Google Scholar
  10. Liamputtong P, Serry T. Making sense of qualitative data. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 421–36.Google Scholar
  11. Mertens DM, Bazeley P, Bowleg L, Fielding N, Maxwell J, Molina-Azorín JF, Niglas K. The future of mixed methods: a five year projection to 2020. Mixed Methods International Research Association. 2016. Retrieved from www.mmira.org.
  12. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Richards L. Handling qualitative data. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2014.Google Scholar
  14. Strauss AL. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Williams ML, Burnap P. Crime sensing with social media. Methods news: newsletter from the National Centre for Research Methods. 2015.Google Scholar
  16. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Translational Research and Social Innovation groupWestern Sydney UniversityLiverpoolAustralia

Personalised recommendations