Advertisement

Metrology pp 1-39 | Cite as

Micro-dimensional Measurement by a Micro-probing System

Living reference work entry
Part of the Precision Manufacturing book series (PRECISION)

Abstract

Micro-probing system has become a remarkable technique for the dimensional measurement of complex micrometric features on the micro-parts and precision tools. In especial, the tactile micro-probes are one of the most effective micro-probing systems since the miniaturized micro-stylus and high-sensitive probing sensor of the micro-probing systems allows both the capability of three-dimensional accessibility and nanometric resolution for the complex micrometric features. Therefore, there have been many efforts for the miniaturization of the stylus size with high-accuracy tip shape. In addition, since high sensitivity of the tactile micro-probing system is influenced by the external interaction force which has been ignored in the previous probing systems, new principle of the probing sensor and novel calibration method of the micro-probing system have been required.

On the other hand, the probe tip ball of the micro-probing systems is composed with the high-accuracy microsphere, so that their diameter is smaller than the micrometric features of the measuring workpiece generally in order to realize good accessibility for complex features. Therefore, precise qualification of the probe tip dimension is also important issues for the calibration of the micro-probing system because the uncertainty of the dimensional measurement is also affected by the geometrical tolerance of the probe tip shape. The uncertainty of the micro-dimensional measurement is dominated not only by the reliability of the micro-probe and the probe positioning instruments as well as the conventional probing system but also by the nanometer-scale deformation of the surface and the nanometric dimension of probe tip. In this chapter, a high-sensitive micro-probing system utilizing the local interaction force has been described. With respect to the compensation of the geometrical tolerance of the tip of the micro-probing system, an online qualification method has been introduced. Finally, dimensional measurement of micrometric feature by a micro-probing system is described, and its measurement results are investigated according to the uncertainty analysis.

Keywords

Micro-dimensional measurement Micro-probing system Micro-stylus Micro-CMM Shear-mode detection Gap width measurement Effective diameter Online qualification Gap width uniformity 

References

  1. Albrecht TR, Grtitter P, Horne D, Rugar D (1991) Frequency modulation detection using high-Q cantilevers for enhanced force microscope sensitivity. J Appl Phys 69:668–673.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.347347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alting L, Kimura F, Hansen HN, Bissacco G (2003) Micro engineering. CIRP Ann 52:635–657.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60208-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antognozzi M, Humphris ADL, Miles MJ (2001) Observation of molecular layering in a confined water film and study of the layers viscoelastic properties. Appl Phys Lett 78:300–302.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1339997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauza MB, Hocken RJ, Smith ST, Woody SC (2005) Development of a virtual probe tip with an application to high aspect ratio microscale features. Rev Sci Instrum 76:095112.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2052027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauza MB, Woody SC, Woody BA, Smith ST (2011) Surface profilometry of high aspect ratio features. Wear 271:519–522.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2010.03.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bos EJC (2011) Aspects of tactile probing on the micro scale. Precis Eng 35:228–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2010.09.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butt HJ, Kappl M (2009) Normal capillary forces. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 146:48–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2008.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen YL, Gao W, Ju BF, Shimizu Y, Ito S (2014) A measurement method of cutting tool position for relay fabrication of microstructured surface. Meas Sci Technol 25:064018.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/25/6/064018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen YL, Ito S, Kikuchi H, Kobayashi R, Shimizu Y, Gao W, (2016) On-line qualification of a micro probing system for precision length measurement of micro-features on precision parts. Measurement Science and Technology 27(7):074008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chou SY, Krauss PR, Renstrom PJ (1996) Nanoimprint lithography. J Vac Sci Technol B 14:4129–4133.  https://doi.org/10.1116/1.588605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christenson HK (1994) Capillary condensation due to van der Waals attraction in wet slits. Phys Rev Lett 73:1821–1824.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.1821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Claverley JD, Leach RK (2010) A vibrating micro-scale CMM probe for measuringhigh aspect ratio structures. Microsyst Technol 16:1507–1512.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-009-0967-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Claverley JD, Leach RK (2013) Development of a three-dimensional vibrating tactile probe for miniature CMMs. Precis Eng 37:491–499.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2012.12.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Claverley JD, Leach RK (2015) A review of the existing performance verification infrastructure for micro-CMMs. Precis Eng 39:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2014.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dai G, Bütefisch S, Pohlenz F, Danzebrink HU (2009) A high precision micro/nano CMM using piezoresistive tactile probes. Meas Sci Technol 20:084001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/20/8/084001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Durakbasa MN, Osanna PH, Demircioglu P (2011) The factors affecting surface roughness measurements of the machined flat and spherical surface structures – the geometry and the precision of the surface. Measurement 44:1986–1999.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2011.08.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eoma SI, Takaya Y, Hayashi T (2009) Novel contact probing method using single fiber optical trapping probe. Precis Eng 33:235–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2008.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fan KC, Cheng F, Wang W, Chen Y, Lin JY (2010) A scanning contact probe for a micro-coordinate measuring machine (CMM). Meas Sci Technol 21:054002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/21/5/054002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferreira N, Krah T, Jeong DC, Metz D, Kniel K, Dietzel A, Büttgenbach S, Hürtig F (2014) Integration of a silicon-based microprobe into a gear measuring instrument for accurate measurement of micro gears. Meas Sci Technol 25:064016.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/25/6/064016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Furukawa M, Gao W, Shimizu H, Kiyono S, Yasutake M, Takahashi K (2003) Slit width measurement of a long precision slot die. J Jpn Soc Precis Eng 69:1013–1017.  https://doi.org/10.2493/jjspe.69.1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gao W (2010) Scanning micro-stylus system for measurement of micro-aspheric. In: Precision nanometrology. Springer series in advanced manufacturing, Springer, Germany, pp. 211–243Google Scholar
  22. Gao W, Araki T, Kiyono S, Okazaki Y, Yamanaka M (2003) Precision nano-fabrication and evaluation of a large area sinusoidal grid surface for a surface encoder. Precis Eng 27:289–298.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-6359(03)00028-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gao W, Chen YL, Lee KW, Noh YJ, Shimizu Y, Ito S (2013) Precision tool setting for fabrication of a microstructure array. CIRP Ann 62:523–526.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gao W, Kim SW, Bosse H, Haitjema H, Chen YL, Lu XD, Knapp W, Weckenmann A, Estler WT, Kunzmann H (2015) Measurement technologies for precision positioning. CIRP Ann 64:773–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goj B, Dressler L, Hoffmann M (2014) Semi-contact measurements of three-dimensional surfaces utilizing a resonant uniaxial microprobe. Meas Sci Technol 25:064012.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/25/6/064012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goj B, Dressler L, Hoffmann L (2015) Design and characterization of a resonanttriaxial microprobe. J Micromech Microeng 25:125011. (9pp).  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/25/12/125011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hansen HN, Carneiro K, Haitjema H, De Chiffre L (2006) Dimensional micro and nano metrology. CIRP Ann 55:721–743.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2006.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. He M, Liu R, Li Y, Wang H, Lu X, Ding G, Wu J, Zhang T, Zhao X (2013) Tactile probing system based on micro-fabricated capacitive sensor. Sensors Actuators A Phys 194:128–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2013.01.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heckele M, Schomburg WK (2004) Review on micro molding of thermoplastic polymers. J Micromech Microeng 14:R1–R14.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/14/3/R01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hidaka K, Schellekens PHJ (2006) Study of a Small-sized Ultrasonic Probe. CIRP Annals 55(1):567–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hidaka K, Saito A, Koga S (2008) Study of a micro-roughness probe with ultrasonic sensor. CIRP Ann 57:489–492.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hidaka K, Danzebrink HU, Illers H, Saito A, Ishikawa N (2010) A high-resolution, self-sensing and self-actuated probe for micro- and nano-coordinate metrology and scanning force microscopy. CIRP Ann 59:517–520.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoffmann J, Weckenmann A, Sun Z (2008) Electrical probing for dimensional micro metrology. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 1:59–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2008.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ito S, Kodama I, Gao W (2014) Development of a probing system for a micro-coordinate measuring machine by utilizing shear-force detection. Meas Sci Technol 25:064011.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/25/6/064011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ito S, Chen YL, Shimizu Y, Kikuchi H, Gao W, Takahashi K, Kanayama T, Arakawa K, Hayashi A (2016a) Uncertainty analysis of slot die coater gap width measurement by using a shear mode micro-probing system. Precis Eng 43:525–529.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2015.09.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ito S, Kikuchi H, Chen Y, Shimizu Y, Gao W, Takahashi K, Kanayama T, Arakawa K, Hayashi A (2016b) A micro-coordinate measurement machine (cmm) for large-scale dimensional measurement of micro-slits. Appl Sci 6:156.  https://doi.org/10.3390/app6050156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. JCGM (2008) JCGM 100:2008 Evaluation of measurement data-guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM) (International bureau of weights and measures). Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, ParisGoogle Scholar
  38. Kim BJ, Masuzawa T, Bourouina T (1999) The vibroscanning method for the measurement of micro-hole profiles. Meas Sci Technol 10:697–705.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/10/8/304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim TJ, Kim SH, Do DH, Yoo HK, Gweon DG (2013) Chromatic confocal microscopy with a novel wavelength detection method using transmittance. Opt Express 21:6286–6294.  https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.006286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krebs CF, Gevorgyan AS, Alstrup J (2009) A roll-to-roll process to flexible polymer solar cells. Model studies, manufacture and operational stability studies. J Mater Chem 19:5442–5451.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B823001CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Küng A, Meli F, Thalmann R (2007) Ultraprecision micro-CMM using a low force 3D touch probe. Meas Sci Technol 18:319–327.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/18/2/S01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lei L, Deng L, Fan G, Cai X, Li Y, Li T (2014) A 3D micro tactile sensor for dimensional metrology of micro structure with nanometer precision. Measurement 48:155–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.10.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li RJ, Xiang M, He YX, Fan KC, Cheng ZY, Huang QX, Zhou B (2016) Development of a high-precision touch-trigger probe using a single sensor. Appl Sci 6(3):86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liebrich T, Knapp W (2010) New concept of a 3D-probing system for micro-components. CIRP Ann 59:513–516.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maeda N, Israelachvili JN, Kohonen MM (2003) Evaporation and instabilities of microscopic capillary bridges. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:803–808.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0234283100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Manning B (2011) The use of non-contact thin gap sensors in controlling coater gapuniformity. Capacitec Inc. 2011. https://www.capacitec.com/. Accessed 8 Jan 2019
  47. Masuzawa T, Hamasaki Y, Fujino M (1993) Vibroscanning method for nondestructive measurement of small holes. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 42(1):589–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mitsubishi Material (2017) http://www.mmc-slotdie.com/. Accessed 31 Dec 2017
  49. Murakami H, Katsuki A, Onikura H, Sajima T, Kawagoishi N, Kondo E (2010) Development of a system for measuring micro hole accuracy using an optical fiber probe. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf 4:995–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.4.995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Murakami H, Katsuki A, Sajima T, Suematsu T (2014) Study of a vibrating fiber probing system for 3-D micro-structures: performance improvement. Meas Sci Technol 25:094010.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/25/9/094010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Murakami H, Katsuki A, Sajima T, Fukuda M (2016) Reduction of liquid bridge force for 3D microstructure measurements. Appl Sci 6:153.  https://doi.org/10.3390/app6050153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nesterov V, Brand U (2005) Modelling and investigation of the silicon twin design 3D micro probe. J Micromech Microeng 15:514–520.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/15/3/011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Noh YJ, Arai Y, Gao W (2009) Improvement of a fast tool control unit for cutting force measurement in diamond turning of micro-lens array. Int J Surf Sci Eng 3:227–241.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSURFSE.2009.026611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Santos S, Verdaguer A, Souier T, Thomson NH, Chiesa M (2011) Measuring the true height of water films on surfaces. Nanotechnology 22:465705. (9pp).  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/22/46/465705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schwenke H, Waldele F, Weiskirch C, Kunzmann H (2001) Opto-tactile sensor for 2D and 3D measurement of small structures on coordinate measuring machines. CIRP Ann 50:361–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62140-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sheu DY (2004) Micro-spherical probes machining by EDM. J Micromech Microeng 15:185–189.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/15/1/026MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thalmann R, Meli F, Küng A (2016) State of the art of tactile micro coordinate metrology. Appl Sci 6:150.  https://doi.org/10.3390/app6050150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weckenmann A, Estler T, Peggs G, McMurtry D (2004) Probing systems in dimensional metrology. CIRP Ann 53:657–684.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60034-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weckenmann A, Peggs G, Hoffmann J (2006) Probing systems for dimensional micro- and nano-metrology. Meas Sci Technol 17:504–509.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/17/3/S08CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weckenmann A, Hoffmann J, Schuler A (2008) Development of a tunnelling current sensor for a long-range nano-positioning device. Meas Sci Technol 19:064002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/19/6/064002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zitzler L, Herminghaus S, Mugele FG (2002) Capillary forces in tapping mode atomic force microscopy. Phys Rev B 66:155436.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.155436CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Intelligent RoboticsToyama Prefectural UniversityImizuJapan

Personalised recommendations