Advertisement

Children’s Participation in the Justice System

  • Aoife Daly
  • Stephanie RapEmail author
Reference work entry
Part of the International Human Rights book series (IHR)

Abstract

The rights of children in youth justice and civil court proceedings, and in particular the right of children to be heard or to “participate” in such systems, is an area in which there has been much interest in recent years, particularly sparked by Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. There are a wide variety of proceedings in which children’s interests are decided, for example, where they are accused of a crime, where their parents are in dispute on family breakdown and where there are child protection concerns. This chapter examines recent developments in standards at international level concerning children’s participation in proceedings, such as the drafting of General Comment No. 12 of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child on the right to be heard and the Guidelines on Child-friendly Justice of the Council of Europe. It draws on recent international research in order to provide analysis of the extent to which such standards have affected practice and made a difference for children. It concludes that although the development of such standards is to be welcomed, and although these standards have achieved some improvements at domestic level, the more extensive modifications required for genuine participation of children in the justice system has not yet occurred.

References

  1. Aebersold P (2001) Schweizerisches Jugendstrafrecht. Stämpfli Verlag, BernGoogle Scholar
  2. Archard D, Skivenes M (2009) Hearing the child. Child Fam Soc Work 14(4):391–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaumont P, Walker L, Holliday J (2015) Not heard and not returned: the reality of article 11(8) proceedings. Int Fam Law 2:124Google Scholar
  4. Brants C, Franken S (2009) The protection of fundamental human rights in criminal process. General report. Utrecht Law Rev 5(2):7–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burman M, Johnstone J, Fraser A, McNeill F (2010) Scotland. In: Dünkel F, Grzywa J, Horsfield P, Pruin I (eds) Juvenile justice systems in Europe. Forum Verlag Godesberg, Mönchengladbach, pp 1149–1194Google Scholar
  6. Cashmore J (2011) Children’s participation in family law decision-making: theoretical approaches to understanding children’s views. Child Youth Serv Rev 33(4):515–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cashmore J, Parkinson P (2007) What responsibilities do courts have to hear children’s voices? Int J Child Rights 15(1):43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cashmore J, Parkinson P (2009) Children’s participation in family law disputes: the views of children, parents, lawyers, counsellors. Fam Matters 82(1):15–21Google Scholar
  9. Child Rights International Network (2016) Rights remedies and representation: global report on access to justice for children. Child Rights International Network, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Children’s Hearings Scotland (2014) Children and young people’s views and experiences of children’s hearings – a summary. Children’s Hearings Scotland, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  11. Cipriani D (2009) Children’s rights and the minimum age of criminal responsibility – a global perspective. Ashgate, Farnham/BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke J (2013) “Do I have a voice?” an empirical analysis of children’s voices in Michigan custody litigation. Fam Law Q 47(3):457–484Google Scholar
  13. Cooper DK (1997) Juveniles’ understanding of trial-related information: are they competent defendants? Behav Sci Law 15(2):167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Council of Europe (2010) Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on child-friendly justice (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 November 2010 at the 1098th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies). Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  15. Daly A (2009) Considered or merely heard? The views of young children in Hague convention cases in Ireland. Ir J Fam Law 12:16–28Google Scholar
  16. Daly A (2018) Children, autonomy and the courts: beyond the right to be heard. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  17. Darlington Y (2006) Experiences of custody evaluation: perspectives of young adults who were the subject of family court proceedings as children. J Child Custody 3(1):51–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Directive (EU) 2016/800 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  19. Dohrn B (2006) Something’s happening here: children and human rights jurisprudence in two international courts. Nev Law J 6(3):749–773Google Scholar
  20. Douglas G, Murch M, Miles C, Scanlan L (2006) Research into the operation of Rule 9.5 of the Family Proceedings Rules, 1991 (Final report to the Department for Constitutional Affairs). Cardiff Law School, CardiffGoogle Scholar
  21. Driver C, Brank EM (2009) Juveniles’ knowledge of the court process: results from instruction from an electronic source. Behav Sci Law 27(4):627–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ECtHR (1994) Stanford v. United Kingdom Application no. 16757/90, Judgment of 23 February 1994Google Scholar
  23. ECtHR (1999a) T. v. United Kingdom Application no. 24724/94, Judgment of 16 December 1999Google Scholar
  24. ECtHR (1999b) V. v. United Kingdom Application no. 24888/94, Judgment of 16 December 1999Google Scholar
  25. ECtHR (2004) S.C. v. United Kingdom Application no. 60958/00, Judgment of 15 June 2004Google Scholar
  26. ECtHR (2009) Güveç v Turkey Application no. 70337/01, Judgment of 20 April 2009Google Scholar
  27. European Union Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) (2015) Child-friendly justice. Perspectives and experiences of professionals on children’s participation in civil and criminal judicial proceedings in 10 EU Member States. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  28. European Union Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) (2017) Child-friendly justice. Perspectives and experiences of children involved in judicial proceedings as victims, witnesses or parties in nine EU Member States. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  29. First Star (2007) A child’s right to counsel: First Star’s national report card on legal representation for children. First Star, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Gollop M, Smith A, Taylor N (2000) Children’s involvement in custody and access arrangements. Child Fam Law Q 12(4):396–399Google Scholar
  31. Grisso T (2000) What we know about youths’ capacities as trial defendants. In: Grisso T, Schwartz RG (eds) Youth on trial. Developmental perspectives on juvenile justice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 139–171Google Scholar
  32. Grisso T, Steinberg L, Woolard J, Cauffman E, Scott E, Graham S et al (2003) Juveniles’ competence to stand trial: a comparison of adolescents’ and adults’ capacities as trial defendants. Law Hum Behav 27(4):333–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hazel N, Hagell A, Brazier L (2002) Young offenders’ perceptions of their experiences in the criminal justice system. Policy Research Bureau, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2002) Juridical condition and human rights of the child, Advisory Opinion OC-17/2002 of 28 Aug 2002Google Scholar
  35. Judicial Studies Board (2010) Youth court bench book. Judicial Studies Board, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Karle M, Gathmann S (2016) The state of the art of child hearings in Germany. Results of a nationwide representative study in German courts. Fam Court Rev 54(2):167–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kennan N, Kilkelly U (2015) Children’s involvement in criminal, civil and administrative judicial proceedings in the 28 Member States of the EU. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  38. Kilkelly U (2005) The children’s court. A children’s rights audit. University College Cork, CorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Kilkelly U (2008a) Youth courts and children’s rights: the Irish experience. Youth Just 8(1):39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kilkelly U (2008b) Youth justice and children’s rights: measuring compliance with international standards. Youth Just 8(3):187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kilkelly U (2010) Listening to children about justice: report of the Council of Europe consultation with children on child-friendly justice. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  42. Krappmann L (2010) The weight of the child’s view (Article 12 of the convention on the rights of the child). Int J Child Rights 18(4):501–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liefaard T (2016) Child-friendly justice: protection and participation of children in the justice system. Temple Law Rev 88:905–927Google Scholar
  44. Liefaard T, Kilkelly U (2018) Child-friendly justice: past, present and future. In: Goldson B (ed) Juvenile justice in Europe: past, present and future. Routledge, New York/LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Lundy L, Kilkelly U, Byrne B, Kang J (2012) The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: a study of legal implementation in 12 countries. UNICEF/Queens University Belfast, BelfastGoogle Scholar
  46. May V, Smart C (2004) Silence in court? Hearing children in residence and contact disputes. Child Fam Law Q 16:305–315Google Scholar
  47. Mckay K (2013) Hearing children in court – disputes between parents. Centre for Research on Families and Relationships, Edinburgh. Available at: https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/6557/briefing%2065.pdf;jsessionid=94531EA699D57F1612E35417F6D23FA1?sequence=1
  48. Morag T (2014) Child Participation in Family Courts. Paper presented at Conference on Child-Friendly Justice, Stockholm, 16–18 May 2014Google Scholar
  49. Morag T, Sorek Y (2015) Children’s participation in Israeli family courts: an account of an ongoing learning process. In: Faedi-Duramy B, Gal T (eds) International perspectives and empirical findings on child participation: from social exclusion to child-inclusive policies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  50. Morag T, Rivkin D, Sorek Y (2012) Child participation in the family courts – lessons from the Israeli governmental pilot project. Int J Law Policy Fam 26(1):1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Plotnikoff J, Woolfson R (2002) Young defendants’ pack: scoping study for the youth justice board. Youth Justice Board, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Rap S (2013) The participation of juvenile defendants in the youth court. A comparative study of juvenile justice procedures in Europe. Pallas Publications, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  53. Rap S (2016) A children’s rights perspective on the participation of juvenile defendants in the youth court. Int J Child Rights 24(1):94–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ryrstedt E (2012) Mediation regarding children: is it always in the best interest of the child? Int J Law Policy Fam 26(2):220–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Taylor N, Gollop M (2007) Children’s participation in family law proceedings: research report for the Childwatch international children and the law study group. Children’s Issues Centre, University of OtagoGoogle Scholar
  56. Tisdall K, Morrison F (2012) Children’s participation in court proceedings when parents divorce or separate: legal constructions and lived experiences. Law Childhood Stud Curr Leg Issues 14:156–179Google Scholar
  57. Tyler TR (2006) Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press, Princeton/OxfordGoogle Scholar
  58. UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (2005) Concluding observations: Denmark. 24 November 2005 CRC/C/DNK/CO/3Google Scholar
  59. UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (2007) Children’s rights in juvenile justice. General Comment No. 10, CRC/C/GC/10Google Scholar
  60. UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (2009) The right of the child to be heard. General Comment No. 12, CRC/C/GC/12Google Scholar
  61. UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) GA Res. 44/25, 20 November 1989Google Scholar
  62. UNICEF Belgium (2010) This is what we think about it! Second report by the Belgian children to the Committee on the Rights of the Child. UNICEF Belgium, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  63. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (The Beijing Rules) GA Res. 40/33, 29 November 1985Google Scholar
  64. Van Bueren G (1992) Child-oriented justice – an international challenge for Europe. Int J Law Fam 6:381–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vis SA, Thomas N (2009) Beyond talking: children’s participation in Norwegian care and protection cases. Eur J Soc Work 12(2):155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weidkuhn U (2009) Jugendstrafrecht und Kinderrechte. Betrachtung des Schweizerischen Jugendstrafrechts im Lichte der Internationalen Rechte des Kindes und im Vergleich zu Südafrika. Schulthess Juristische Medien, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  67. Weisz V et al (2011) Children’s participation in foster care hearings. Child Abuse Negl 35(4):267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Law and Social JusticeUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Leiden Law SchoolLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations