Advertisement

Qualitative Interviewing

  • Sally NathanEmail author
  • Christy Newman
  • Kari Lancaster
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Qualitative interviewing is a foundational method in qualitative research and is widely used in health research and the social sciences. Both qualitative semi-structured and in-depth unstructured interviews use verbal communication, mostly in face-to-face interactions, to collect data about the attitudes, beliefs, and experiences of participants. Interviews are an accessible, often affordable, and effective method to understand the socially situated world of research participants. The approach is typically informed by an interpretive framework where the data collected is not viewed as evidence of the truth or reality of a situation or experience but rather a context-bound subjective insight from the participants. The researcher needs to be open to new insights and to privilege the participant’s experience in data collection. The data from qualitative interviews is not generalizable, but its exploratory nature permits the collection of rich data which can answer questions about which little is already known. This chapter introduces the reader to qualitative interviewing, the range of traditions within which interviewing is utilized as a method, and highlights the advantages and some of the challenges and misconceptions in its application. The chapter also provides practical guidance on planning and conducting interview studies. Three case examples are presented to highlight the benefits and risks in the use of interviewing with different participants, providing situated insights as well as advice about how to go about learning to interview if you are a novice.

Keywords

In-depth interviews Semi-structured interviews Qualitative interviewing Interview study design Interview methodology Interview method 

References

  1. Baez B. Confidentiality in qualitative research: reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qual Res. 2002;2(1):35–58.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: Sage Publications; 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Braun V, Clarke V, Gray D. Collecting qualitative data: a practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryman A. Social research methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  5. Crotty M. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. Australia: Allen & Unwin; 1998.Google Scholar
  6. Davies MB. Doing a successful research project: using qualitative or quantitative methods. New York: Palgrave MacMillan; 2007.Google Scholar
  7. Dickson-Swift V, James EL, Liamputtong P. Undertaking sensitive research in the health and social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foster M, Nathan S, Ferry M. The experience of drug-dependent adolescents in a therapeutic community. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010;29(5):531–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gillham B. The research interview. London: Continuum; 2000.Google Scholar
  10. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967.Google Scholar
  11. Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P. In-depth interview. In: The practice of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2011. p. 119–47Google Scholar
  12. Irvine A. Duration, dominance and depth in telephone and face-to-face interviews: a comparative exploration. Int J Qual Methods. 2011;10(3):202–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson JM. In-depth interviewing. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, editors. Handbook of interview research: context and method. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2001.Google Scholar
  14. Kvale S. Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1996.Google Scholar
  15. Kvale S. Doing interviews. London: Sage Publications; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lancaster K. Confidentiality, anonymity and power relations in elite interviewing: conducting qualitative policy research in a politicised domain. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017;20(1):93–103.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1123555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leavy P. Method meets art: arts-based research practice. New York: Guilford Publications; 2015.Google Scholar
  18. Liamputtong P. Researching the vulnerable: a guide to sensitive research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  20. Mays N, Pope C. Quality in qualitative health research. In: Pope C, Mays N, editors. Qualitative research in health care. London: BMJ Books; 2000. p. 89–102.Google Scholar
  21. McLellan E, MacQueen KM, Neidig JL. Beyond the qualitative interview: data preparation and transcription. Field Methods. 2003;15(1):63–84.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x02239573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Minichiello V, Aroni R, Hays T. In-depth interviewing: principles, techniques, analysis. 3rd ed. Sydney: Pearson Education Australia; 2008.Google Scholar
  23. Morris ZS. The truth about interviewing elites. Politics. 2009;29(3):209–17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2009.01357.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nathan S, Foster M, Ferry M. Peer and sexual relationships in the experience of drug-dependent adolescents in a therapeutic community. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011;30(4):419–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. National Health and Medical Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra: Australian Government; 2007.Google Scholar
  26. Neal S, McLaughlin E. Researching up? Interviews, emotionality and policy-making elites. J Soc Policy. 2009;38(04):689–707.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279409990018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Reilly M, Parker N. ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2013;13(2):190–7.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112446106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ostrander S. “Surely you're not in this just to be helpful”: access, rapport and interviews in three studies of elites. In: Hertz R, Imber J, editors. Studying elites using qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1995. p. 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Patton M. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2015.Google Scholar
  30. Punch KF. Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage; 2005.Google Scholar
  31. Rhodes T, Bernays S, Houmoller K. Parents who use drugs: accounting for damage and its limitation. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(8):1489–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Riessman CK. Narrative analysis. London: Sage; 1993.Google Scholar
  33. Ritchie J. Not everything can be reduced to numbers. In: Berglund C, editor. Health research. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 149–73.Google Scholar
  34. Rubin H, Rubin I. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2012.Google Scholar
  35. Serry T, Liamputtong P. The in-depth interviewing method in health. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 67–83.Google Scholar
  36. Silverman D. Doing qualitative research. 5th ed. London: Sage; 2017.Google Scholar
  37. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (coreq): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.  https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUNSWSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Social Research in Health, Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesUNSWSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations