Statistics about Indigenous peoples are a common feature of Anglo-colonizing nation states such as Canada, Australia, Aotearoa New Zealand, and the United States (CANZUS). The impetus for the production of most Indigenous statistics is the shared position of Indigenous disadvantage in health and socioeconomic status. In this chapter, we contrast statistics about Indigenous peoples with statistics for Indigenous people and statistics by Indigenous people. There are very significant differences between these categories of Indigenous statistics. At the heart of these differences is the methodology that informs the research processes and practices. Statistics about Indigenous peoples often reflect the dominant social norms, values, and racial hierarchy of the society in which they are created. In the CANZUS states, these statistics are deficit focused and, at times, victim blaming. Also missing from these statistical portrayals is the culture, interests, perspectives, and alternative narratives of the Indigenous peoples that they purport to represent. We contrast these statistics with those from statistical research using processes and practices that are shaped by Indigenous methodologies. Indigenous methodologies are distinguished by their prioritization of Indigenous methods, protocols, values, and epistemologies. We conclude with two examples of what Indigenous quantitative methodologies look like in practice from Aotearoa NZ and Australia.
KeywordsIndigenous Statistics New Zealand Australia Colonization Methodology
- Ajwani S, Blakely T, Robson B, Tobias M, Bonne M. Decades of disparity: ethnic mortality trends in New Zealand 1980–1999, Public Health Intelligence Occasional Bulletin Number 16. Wellington: Ministry of Health and University of Otago; 2003.Google Scholar
- Andersen C, Walter M. Indigenous perspectives and cultural identity. In: Hyde M, Carpenter L, Conway R, editors. Diversity and inclusion in Australian schools. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 63–87.Google Scholar
- Anderson I, Robson B, Connolly M, Al-Yaman F, Bjertness E, King A, …, Yap L. Indigenous and tribal peoples’ health (The Lancet–Lowitja Institute Global Collaboration): a population study. The Lancet. 2016;388(10040):131–57.Google Scholar
- Anderson I, Lyons JG, Luke JN, Reich HS. Health determinants and educational outcomes for indigenous children. In: Walter M, Martin KL, Bodkin-Andrews G, editors. Growing up strong children: indigenous perspectives on the longitudinal study of indigenous children. London: Palgrave MacMillan; in press.Google Scholar
- Bessarab D, Ng’andu B. Yarning about yarning as a legitimate method in indigenous research. Int J Crit Indig Stud. 2010;3(1):37–50.Google Scholar
- Chilisa B. Indigenous research methodologies. London: SAGE; 2011.Google Scholar
- Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health, Final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.Google Scholar
- Cooke M, Mitrou F, Lawrence D, Guimond E, Beavon D. Indigenous well-being in four countries: an application of the UNDP’s human development index to indigenous peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. BMC Int Health Human Rights. 2007;7(9):1–11.Google Scholar
- Cunningham C, Stevenson B, Tassell N. Analysis of the characteristics of whānau in Aotearoa. Report for the Ministry of Education. Palmerston North: Massey University; 2005.Google Scholar
- First Nations Information Governance Centre. Ownership, control, access and possession (OCAP™): The path to First Nations information governance. Ottawa: The First Nations Information Governance Centre; 2014. Retrieved from http://fnigc.ca/sites/default/files/docs/ocap_path_to_fn_information_governance_en_final.pdf.
- Gunnestad A. Resilience in a cross-cultural perspective. How resilience is generated in different cultures. J Intercult Commun. 2006;11. Retrieved from http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr11/gunnestad.htm.
- Kahakalau K. Indigenous heuristic action research: bridging western and indigenous research methodologies. Hulili: Multidiscip Res Hawaii Well-Being. 2004;1(1):19–33.Google Scholar
- Kovach M. Indigenous methodologies: characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2009.Google Scholar
- Kruger T, Pitman M, Grennell D, McDonald T, Mariu D, Pōmare A, Mita T, Maihi M, Lawson-Te Aho K. Transforming whānau violence – a conceptual framework. Wellington: Second Māori Taskforce on Whānau Violence; 2004.Google Scholar
- Kukutai T, Taylor J, editors. Indigenous data sovereignty: towards an agenda, CAEPR Research Monograph, 2016/34. Canberra: ANU Press; 2016.Google Scholar
- Kukutai T, Sporle A, Roskruge M. Expressions of whānau. In: Social policy evaluation and research unit, families and Whānau status report 2016. Wellington: Superu; 2016. p. 52–77.Google Scholar
- Lalonde CE. Identity formation and cultural resilience in aboriginal communities. In: Flynn RJ, Duding P, Barber J, editors. Promoting resilience in child welfare. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press; 2006. p. 52–67.Google Scholar
- Lawson-Te Aho K. Definitions of whānau: a review of selected literature. Wellington: Families Commission; 2010.Google Scholar
- Martin K. Please knock before you enter: aboriginal regulation of outsiders and the implications for researchers. Teneriffe: Post Press; 2008.Google Scholar
- Moewaka Barnes HM. Kaupapa Māori: explaining the ordinary. Pac Health Dialog. 2000;7(1): 13–6.Google Scholar
- New Zealand Government. Government ICT strategy and action plan to 2017. ICT Action plan 2014. Retrieved from: https://www.ict.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Government-ICT-Strategy-and-Action-Plan-to-2017.pdf (2014).
- Porsanger J. An essay about indigenous methodology. Retrieved from http://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/906/article.pdf..?sequence=1 (2004).
- Robson B, Reid P. Ethnicity matters: Māori perspectives. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand; 2001.Google Scholar
- Smith G. Whakaoho whānau: new formations of whānau and an innovative intervention into Māori cultural and economic crises. He Pukenga Korero. 1995;1:18–36.Google Scholar
- Snipp M. What does data sovereignty imply – what does it look like? In: Kukutai T, Taylor J, editors. Indigenous data aovereignty: towards an agenda, CAEPR Research Monograph, 2016/34. Canberra: ANU Press; 2016.Google Scholar
- Statistics New Zealand. He kohinga whakaaro/Māori social survey discussion document. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand; 2009.Google Scholar
- Taylor J, Kukutai T. Indigenous data sovereignly and indicators: reflections from Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. In: Paper presented at the UNPFII Expert Group Meeting on “The Way Forward: Indigenous Peoples and the 2039 Agenda for Sustainable Development”, United Nations, HQ, New York, 22–23 Oct. 2015.Google Scholar
- Te Rito JS. Whakapapa and whenua: an insider’s view. MAI Rev. 2007;3:1–8.Google Scholar
- The Treasury. Social investment. Retrieved from: http://www.treasury.govt.nz/statesector/socialinvestment (2016).
- Tibble A, Ussher S. Kei te pēwhea tō whānau? Exploring whānau using the Māori social survey. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand; 2012.Google Scholar
- Trudgett M, Page S, Bodkin-Andrews G, Franklin C, Whittaker A. Another brick in the wall? Parent perceptions of school educational experiences of indigenous Australian children. In: Walter M, Martin KL, Bodkin-Andrews G, editors. Growing up strong children: indigenous perspective on the longitudinal study of indigenous children. London: Palgrave MacMillan; in press.Google Scholar
- Tuhiwai Smith L. Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. London/New York: Zed Books; 1999.Google Scholar
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. State of the world’s indigenous peoples, 2nd vol.: indigenous people’s access to health services. New York: UNDESA; 2015.Google Scholar
- United Nations General Assembly. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. 70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E (2015).
- Valencia RR, editor. The evolution of deficit thinking: educational thought and practice. London: Routledge; 2012.Google Scholar
- Vulnerable Children Act. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2014/0040/latest/DLM5501618.html (2014).
- Walter M. The politics of the data: how the Australian statistical indigene is constructed. Int J Crit Indigenous Stud. 2010;3(2):45–54.Google Scholar
- Walter M. Data politics and indigenous representation in Australian statistics. In: Kukutai T, Taylor J, editors. Indigenous data sovereignty: towards an agenda, CAEPR Research Monograph, 2016/34. Canberra: ANU Press; 2016.Google Scholar
- Walter M, Andersen C. Indigenous statistics: a quantitative methodology. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- Yap M, Yu E. Data sovereignty for the Yawuru in Western Australia. In: Kukutai T, Taylor J, editors. Indigenous data sovereignty: towards an agenda, CAEPR Research Monograph, 2016/34. Canberra: ANU Press; 2016.Google Scholar