Anticorruption Campaign and the Value of Political Connection

Living reference work entry


Political environment has significant effects on the competitive environment of firms. In response to this, many firms adopt active corporate political activity to shape government policy in ways favorable to themselves. There are important political events in 2016. First, the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum result was announced on June 24, 2016, and United Kingdom will withdraw from the European Union. This is widely known as Brexit. Second, Donald Trump was elected in November 2016 to be the next United States president, while before the election, Hilary Clinton was in a favorite position. Both Brexit and the United States presidential election surprised the global markets and had significant impacts on the world politics and economy. We also see firms change their operation to respond: Global financial firms may move their European headquarters from London to other European countries, and many business leaders visited the Trump Tower to talk to the United States president-elect. It is documented that on average the stock price increased on the day when their CEOs visited the Trump Tower (See the news report by CNBC on January 11, 2017. The news can be accessed here:


Anticorruption Campaign Political Connections Corporate Political Activity Trump Tower United States President-elect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We are grateful to the Research Grants Council of Natural Science Foundation of China (71302127 and 71772196), Young Elite Teacher Project of Central University of Finance and Economics (QYP1606), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Program for Innovation Research in Central University of Finance and Economics, The Special Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Ministry of Education (20130016120001) and The Ministry of education of Humanities and Social Science project (17YJC630062).


  1. Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Am Econ Rev 96(1):369–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hillman A, Hitt M (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: a model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad Manag Rev 24(4):825–842Google Scholar
  3. Lin C, Morck R, Yeung B, Zhao X (2016) Anti-corruption reforms and shareholder valuations: event study evidence from China, NBER working paper no. 22001Google Scholar
  4. Murphy K, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1993) Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth? Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 83(2):409–414Google Scholar
  5. North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Qian N, Wen J (2015) The impact of Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption campaign on luxury imports in China, Yale working paperGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessCentral University of Finance and EconomicsBeijingChina

Section editors and affiliations

  • Song Lin
    • 1
  1. 1.Business SchoolCentral University of Finance and EconomicsBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations