Advertisement

Visual Representations of Knowledge for Strategy Communication

  • Jianxin GeEmail author
  • Sabrina Bresciani
  • Hongjia Xu
Living reference work entry

Abstract

To convince employees to implement the organizational strategy is a pervasive issue in organizations: how can the communication of a corporate strategy be enhanced so that employees are committed to it? A recent experimental study found that visual representations can improve attitude toward the organizational strategy, and that a visual format improves employees’ intention to comply with the strategy only in the West but not in China. In order to explore the reasons why Westerner and Chinese subjects were found to have differing behaviors related to strategy commitment (despite having similar attitudes), we set up a qualitative study based on interviews with 51 managers in a Chinese company. The outcome suggests that Chinese employees have a slight preference for a visual format of strategy communication, but that they would comply with the strategy in any format it is presented - because it is the duty of the top managers to develop the strategy. These results differ substantially from Western employees, which need to be persuaded by the strategy to be committed to implement it.

Keywords

Strategy communication Cross-Cultural management Visual mapping Strategy implementation Strategy representations 

References

  1. Adler NJ (1983) Cross-cultural management research: the ostrich and the trend. Acad Manag Rev 8(2):226–232Google Scholar
  2. Alexander LD (1985) Successfully implementing strategic decisions. Long Range Plan 18:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ariely D (2008) Predictably irrational. HarperCollins, New York, p 20Google Scholar
  4. Bresciani S, Eppler MJ (2009) The benefits of synchronous collaborative information visualization: evidence from an experimental evaluation. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 15(6)Google Scholar
  5. Bresciani S, Ge J, Yaru N (2014) Improving attitude toward corporate strategy with visual mapping: scale development and application in Europe and China. Front Bus Res China 8(4):480–499Google Scholar
  6. Bruner J (1979) On knowing: essays for the left hand, 2nd edn. Harvard University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  7. Comi A, Bischof N, Eppler MJ (2014) Beyond projection: using collaborative visualization to conduct qualitative interviews. Qual Res Organ Manag 9(2):110–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eppler MJ, Burkard RA (2007) Visual representations in knowledge management: framework and cases. J Knowl Manag 11:112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eppler MJ, Ge J (2008) Communicating with diagrams: how intuitive and cross-cultural are business graphics? Euro Asia J Manag 18:3–22Google Scholar
  10. Fenton EM (2007) Visualising strategic change: the role and impact of process maps as boundary objects in reorganisation. Eur Manag J 25(2):104–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kernbach S, Eppler MJ, Bresciani S (2014) The use of visualization in the communication of business strategies: an experimental evaluation. Int J Bus Commun. Sage 52(2):164–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li Y, Guo-hui S, Eppler MJ (2010) Making strategy work: a literature review on the factors influencing strategy implementation. In: Handbook of research on strategy process. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 165–183Google Scholar
  13. Masuda T, Nisbett RE (2006) Culture and change blindness. Cogn Sci 30(2):381–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mintzberg H (1977) Strategy formulation as a historical process. Int Stud Manag Organ 7(2):28–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Neher K (2013) Visual social media marketing: harnessing images, instagram, infographics and pinterest to grow your business online. Boot Camp PubGoogle Scholar
  16. Nisbett R (2003) The geography of thought: how Asians and Westerners think differently…and why. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Donnell AM, Dansereau DF, Hall RH (2002) Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educ Psychol Rev 14(1):71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Peng W, Litteljohn D (2001) Organisational communication and strategy implementation – a primary inquiry. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 13:360–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Platts KW, Tan KH (2004) Strategy visualisation: knowing, understanding, and formulating. Manag Decis 42(5/6):667–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Samovar L, Porter R, McDaniel E (2011) Intercultural communication: a reader. Cengage Learning, BostonGoogle Scholar
  21. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) A mathematical model of communication. University of Urbana, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  22. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M (1980) A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 6(2):174–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sojka JZ, Giese JL (2006) Communicating through pictures and words: understanding the role of affect and cognition in processing visual and verbal information. Psychol Mark 23(12):995–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Suthers DD (2005) Collaborative knowledge construction through shared representations. In: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, (HICSS’05), Big Island, HI, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Tversky B (2005) Visuospatial reasoning. In: Holyoak K, Morrison R (eds) Handbook of reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 209–249Google Scholar
  26. Wang P (2009) Strategic management: tools and cases. China Machine Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  27. Yakura EK (2002) Charting time: timelines as temporal boundary objects. Acad Manag J 45(5):956–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolCentral University of Finance and EconomicsBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute for Media and Communications Management – MCMUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Song Lin
    • 1
  1. 1.Business SchoolCentral University of Finance and EconomicsBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations