Advertisement

How Theory Acts as the Retrieval Apparatus in Methods

Historical Thoughts on Romanticized Intellectual Practices
  • Thomas S. PopkewitzEmail author
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

There is a romanticism of “methods.” The social scientist romanticizes measuring devices for the retrieval of the facts of the present. The historian romanticism is in the archive as the site where methods retrieve what is true, beautiful and the authentic. This chapter explores the faith and security in historical methods as historically ironic. The archive is not merely there to retrieve what is to understand as human life and change. The cultural principles generated in methods circulate to order the questions, selection and interpretations of what is constituted as “data.” Embodied in historical methods are styles of reasoning that produce principles by which judgments are made, conclusions drawn, and fields of existence made manageable. The romanticizing of methods elides how methods “act” to make facts as facts!

My argument focuses on the historical dangers of romanticizing methods as the quest to define the historian’s professional competence. To make methods as an autonomous subject empties history of history and erases the political of modernity by ignoring how the objects of reflection and action are produced and enacted. Yet recognizing how theory operates in methods as a determinant of what become “the facts” of the past is not necessarily bad; and the embodiment of styles of reasoning is not something that can be undone to enable the historian to find truth itself. Nor it is to underestimate the role of the archives for the work of the historians. But they do require continual scrutiny as part of professional competence.

Keywords

History of science Historical epistemology Historical theory and method in educational history 

References

  1. Agamben G. The signature of all things: on method (trans: Santo Ld). New York: Zone Books; 2009.Google Scholar
  2. Baker DP. The schooled society: the educational transformation of global culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  3. Bateson G. Naven: a survey of the problems suggested by a composite picture of the culture of a New Guinea tribe drawn from three points of view. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1958.Google Scholar
  4. Benjamin W. Theses on the philosophy of history (trans: Zohn H). In: Arendt H, editors. Illuminations: essays and reflections. New York: Schocken Book; 1955/1985. p. 253–64.Google Scholar
  5. Berger P. Invitation to sociology: a humanistic perspective. New York: Doubleday; 1963.Google Scholar
  6. Bloch M. The historian’s craft (trans: Putnam P). New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1949/1964.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu P. Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of taste (trans: Nice R). Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1984.Google Scholar
  8. Burke C, Grosvenor I. An exploration of the writing and reading of a life: the “body parts” of the Victorian School Architect E.R. Robson. In: Popkewitz TS, editor. Rethinking the history of education: transnational perspectives on its questions, methods, and knowledge. New York: Palgrave; 2013. p. 201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakrabarty D. The calling of history. Sir Jadunath Sarkar and his empire of truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collingwood RG. The idea of history. New York: Oxford University Press; 1957.Google Scholar
  11. Danziger K. Naming the mind: how psychology found its language. London: Sage; 1997.Google Scholar
  12. Daston L, Galison P. Objectivity. Hereford: Zone; 2010.Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze G, Guattari F. What is philosophy? (trans: Tomlinson H, Burchell G). New York: Columbia University Press; 1991/1994.Google Scholar
  14. Derrida J. Points (ed: Weber E and trans: Kamuf P et al). Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  15. Dussel I. The visual turn in the history of education. In: Popkewitz TS, editor. Rethinking the history of education: transnational perspectives on its questions, methods, and knowledge, vol. 2013. New York: Palgrave; 2013. p. 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisenstadt SN. Multiple modernities. Daedalus. 2000;129(1):1–29.Google Scholar
  17. Hacking I. “Style” for historians and philosophers. Stud Hist Philos Sci. 1992;23(1):1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herbst J. The German historical school in American scholarship: a study in the transfer of culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1965.Google Scholar
  19. Horlacher R. The educated subject and the German concept of Bildung: a comparative cultural history. New York: Routledge; 2016.Google Scholar
  20. Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1970.Google Scholar
  21. Meda J, Viñao A. School memory: historiographical balance and heuristics perspectives. In: Yanes-Cabrera C, Meda J, Viñao A, editors. School memories: new trends in the history of education. Cham: Springer International; 2017. p. 1–9.Google Scholar
  22. Ó JR, Martins CS, Paz AL. Genealogy of history: from pupil to artist as the dynamics of genius, status, and inventiveness in art education in Portugal. In: Popkewitz TS, editor. Rethinking the history of education: transnational perspectives on its questions, methods, and knowledge. New York: Palgrave; 2013. p. 157–78.Google Scholar
  23. Ortega y Gasset J. History as a system and other essays toward a philosophy of history (trans: Miller J). New York: W.W. Norton; 1941/1962.Google Scholar
  24. Pearson K. National life from the standpoint of science. London: A and C Black; 1905.Google Scholar
  25. Popkewitz T, editor. Inventing the modern self and John Dewey: modernities and the traveling of pragmatism in education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.Google Scholar
  26. Popkewitz T, Yates L, McGulloch G, Westberg J, Piattoeva N, Capelli G, Head R. The cult of facts, romanticizing the archive, and ignoring styles of reasoning: delusive technologies of conducting historical research. Int J Hist Educ. 2018;8(2):191–220.Google Scholar
  27. Ruesch J, Bateson G. Communication: the social matrix of psychiatry. New York: W.W. Norton; 1951.Google Scholar
  28. Schrader A. Haunted measurements: demonic work and time in experimentation. Differences. J Fem Cult Stud. 2012;23(3):119–60.Google Scholar
  29. Steedman C. Dust: the archive and cultural history. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  30. Stoler AL. Along the archival grain: epistemic anxieties and colonial common sense. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  31. Tröhler D. Truffle pigs, research questions, and histories of education. In: Popkewitz TS, editor. Rethinking the history of education: transnational perspectives on its questions, methods, and knowledge. New York: Palgrave; 2013. p. 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tröhler D. The construction of society and conceptions of education. Comparative visions in Germany, France, and the United States around 1900. In: Popkewitz TS, editor. The reason of schooling: historicizing curriculum studies, pedagogy, and teacher education. New York: Routledge; 2014. p. 21–39.Google Scholar
  33. Tröhler D, Horlacher R. Histories of ideas and ideas in context. In: Fitzgerald T, editor. International handbook of historical studies in education: debates, tensions, and directions. Dordrecht: Springer; in press.Google Scholar
  34. Viñao A. La historia de la educación como disciplina y campo de investigación: viejas y nuevas cuestiones. Espacio Tiempo Educ. 2016;3(1):21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wittrock B. Modernity: one, none, or many? European origins and modernity as a global condition. Daedalus. 2000;29(1):31–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations