Doctoral Supervision with Colleagues
The doctoral supervision of an academic colleague when both are employed in the same university has attracted limited research. In contrast, there is a plethora of research on a range of aspects related to doctoral supervision including processes associated with doctoral supervision, guidance for the doctoral supervisor, and the relationship between the doctoral supervisor and candidate. The completion of a doctorate is a substantial investment by both the candidate and the university and is brought into even sharper focus if the candidate is also an employee at the same university. Though each of the parties is driven by different agendas, they share a common interest in the successful completion of the doctorate. This may place additional pressure on the candidate and supervisor, particularly in relation to their professional credibility and career trajectory.
This chapter draws from previous research conducted by the authors’ into this complex relationship and presents a number of recommendations to inform best practice. These recommendations have been drawn from the research participants, literature, and the authors’ experiences as doctoral candidates and doctoral supervisors for colleagues. The first section discusses important issues related to the area of colleague doctoral supervision. The following section identifies a series of recommendations concerning colleague doctoral supervision for the various stakeholders. The final section offers a blueprint for those tasked with formalizing this potential complex relationship.
KeywordsDoctoral supervision Colleague Supervisor University sector University policy
- Barnett, Ronald. 1999. Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Easterly, Debra M., and Cynthia S. Ricard. 2011. Conscious efforts to end unconscious bias: Why women leave academic research. Journal of Research Administration 17 (1): 61–73.Google Scholar
- Foreman, Peter and David A. Whetten. 2002. Members’ identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science 13 (6): 618 –635.Google Scholar
- Forsyth, Hannah. 2014. A history of the modern Australian university. Sydney: NewSouth Publishing.Google Scholar
- Franko, Debra L., Jan Rinehart, Kathleen Kenney, Mary Loeffelholz, Barbara Guthrie, and Paula Caligiuri. 2016. Supporting faculty mentoring through the use of creative technologies: There’s an app for that. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education 5 (1): 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hemer, Susan R. 2012. Informality, power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: Supervising PhD candidates over coffee. Higher Education Research and Development 31 (6): 827–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.674011. http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jepsen, Denise M., Melinda M. Varhegyi, and Daniel Edwards. 2012. Academics’ attitudes towards PhD students’ teaching: Preparing research higher degree students for an academic career. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 34 (6): 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.727706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy, John F. 1961. Inaugural address of President John F. Kennedy. Washington, DC: John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum. http://www.jfklibrary.org/Research/Research-Aids/Ready-Reference/JFK-Quotations/Inaugural-Address.aspx. Accessed 26 Apr 2016.Google Scholar
- Lemmer, Eleanor M. 2016. The postgraduate supervisor under scrutiny: An autoethnographic inquiry. Qualitative Sociology Review 12 (1): 78–97.Google Scholar
- Peelo, Moira. 2011. Understanding supervision and the PhD. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Pyhältö, Kirsi, Jenna Vekkaila, and Jenni Keskinen. 2015. Fit matters in the supervisory relationship: Doctoral students’ and supervisors’ perceptions about the supervisory activities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (1): 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ross, John. 2016. PhDs failing to make the grade with uni employers. The Australian. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/phds-failing-to-make-the-grade-with-uni-employers/news-story/3239e6b9bef288e8bcb4f1fe306042cc. Accessed 15 Apr 2016.
- Schulze, Salomé. 2014. Finding the academic self: Identity development of academics as doctoral students. Koers – Bulletin for Christian Scholarship 79 (1): 1.Google Scholar
- Slaughter, Shelia, and Larry L. Leslie. 1997. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar