Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

2019 Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Animal Agriculture and Welfare Footprints

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_90



Agriculture and wild food harvesting impact the welfare of humans and other animals in many ways. The total impact on welfare varies according to the foodstuffs in question as well as the methods of production or harvesting used. Just as different lifestyles have different sized carbon footprints, different diets have different sized welfare footprints or total negative consequences to the welfare of sentient humans and nonhuman animals. Because every diet has a welfare footprint, the salient questions concern the size and moral salience of welfare footprints. This entry surveys the connections between human dietary choices, agriculture and other forms of food procurement, and welfare footprints, particularly as they pertain to nonhuman animals.

The Concept of a Welfare Footprint

In an increasingly globalized, industrialized, and urbanized world,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001). Final report: The toxic Dinoflagellate, Pfiesteria piscicida, as a potential biosensor of estuarine stress. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/index.cfm/fuseaction/display.abstractDetail/abstract/839/report/F. Accessed 25 Jun 2013.
  2. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/a0701e/a0701e.pdf
  3. MacClellan, J. (2013). Size matters: Animal size, contributory causation, and ethical vegetarianism. Journal of Animal Ethics, 3(1), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mohr, N. (2012). The number of animals killed for food. http://animaldeathcount.blogspot.com/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Binghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA