Skip to main content

Institutional Food Service

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics
  • 10 Accesses

Introduction

Institutional food service can be defined as entities that provide meals at institutions including schools, colleges and universities, and hospitals, as well as correctional facilities, public and private cafeterias, nursing homes, and day-care and senior centers. Interest lies in their potential roles in sourcing food from regional farmers, ranchers, and processors, thereby contributing to the development of regional food systems through farm to institution (FTI) or farm to cafeteria programs, of which farm to school (FTS) is the best known case. These programs combine local food procurement and experiential education to forge closer ties between farmers and consumers.

These programs are large in number. As of March 2013, the National Farm to School Network estimated there were more than 12,000 FTS programs, existing in all 50 states and reaching 5.7 million schoolchildren. Programs and organizations such as the National Farm to School Network, Real Food Challenge, and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bagdonis, J. M., Hinrichs, C. C., & Schafft, K. A. (2009). The emergence and framing of farm-to-school initiatives: Civic engagement, health and local agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values, 26, 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, D., Nowak, A., Berkenkamp, J., Feenstra, G., Van Soelen Kim, J., Liquori, T., & Hamm, M. (2011). Value chains for sustainable procurement in large school districts: Fostering partnerships. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 1(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2011.014.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, D. S., King, B., Kolodinsky, J., Roche, E., Koliba, C., & Trubek, A. (2012). You can know your school and feed it too: Vermont farmers’ motivations and distribution practices in direct sales to school food services. Agriculture and Human Values, 29(3), 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H. (2000). Collaborative advantage: Winning through extended enterprise supplier networks. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, G., Allen, P., Hardesty, S., Ohmart, J., & Perez, J. (2011). Using a supply chain analysis to assess the sustainability of farm-to-institution programs. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 1(4), 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J. E. (1996). A transaction cost approach to supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 1(2), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598549610155260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izumi, B. T., Wright, D. W., & Hamm, M. W. (2009). Farm to school programs: Exploring the role of regionally-based food distributors in alternative agrifood networks. Agriculture and Human Values, 27(3), 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izumi, B. T., Alaimo, K., & Hamm, M. W. (2010a). Farm-to-school programs: Perspectives of school food service professionals. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 42(2), 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izumi, B. T., Wright, D. W., & Hamm, M. W. (2010b). Market diversification and social benefits: Motivations of farmers participating in farm to school programs. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(4), 374–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. (1996). The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships. Harvard Business Review, 74, 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, E., Conner, D., Kolodinsky, J. M., Buckwalter, E., Berlin, L., & Powers, A. (2012). Social cognitive theory as a framework for considering farm to school programming. Childhood Obesity, 8(4), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2012.0035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA Food and Nutrition Service. (2009). National school lunch program fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Lunch/AboutLunch/NSLPFactSheet.pdf.

  • Vallianatos, M., Gottlieb, R., & Hasse, M. A. (2004). Farm-to-school: Strategies for urban health, combating sprawl and establishing a community food system approach. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(4), 414–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, R. A., & Kaiser, L. L. (2008). Still a time to act: A review of institutional marketing of regionally-grown food. Agriculture and Human Values, 25, 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David S. Conner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Conner, D.S. (2019). Institutional Food Service. In: Kaplan, D.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_80

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics