Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

2019 Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Sustainable Consumption and Gender

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_461



If population and consumption trends continue, the equivalent of two Earths will be needed to support humanity by 2030 (Global Footprint Network 2012). The social, environmental, and economic impacts of global consumptive trends are well documented in the sustainable consumption literature. This entry discusses some of the major food-related sustainable consumption trends and does so by using a gender lens to better understand the gender factors and realities within these trends. The term “sustainable consumption” is used in accordance with the United Nations Environment Programme’s working definition: “The use of goods and services that respond to basic needs and bring a better quality of life, while minimizing the use of natural resources, toxic materials and emissions of waste and pollutants over the lifecycle, so as not to jeopardize...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Casimir, G., & Dutilh, C. (2003). Sustainability: A gender studies perspective. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27, 316–325.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1470-6431.2003.00323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. FAO. (1995). Plan of action for women in development (1996–2001). http://www.fao.org/sd/wpdirect/wpre0001.htm. Accessed Aug 2013.
  3. FAO. (1997, May). Gender: The key to sustainability and food security. SD Dimensions. www.fao.org/sd. Accessed Aug 2013.
  4. Global Footprint Network. (2012). http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN. Accessed Aug 2013.
  5. Grover, S., Flenley, C., & Hemmati, M. (1999, April). Gender & sustainable consumption. Bridging Policy Gaps in the Context of Chapter 4, Agenda 21 “Changing Consumption and Production Patterns”. Report to the UN Commission on Sustainable Development 7th Session. London: UNED-UK.Google Scholar
  6. Ofstad, S. (Ed.). (1994). Symposium: Sustainable consumption. Oslo: Ministry of the Environment.Google Scholar
  7. Schultz, I., & Stieß, I. (2009). Gender aspects of sustainable consumption strategies and instruments. EUPOPP Work Package 1, Deliverable 1.1. Frankfurt/Main: Institute for Social-Ecological Research (ISOE).Google Scholar
  8. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2013). Gender and climate change. http://unfccc.int/gender_and_climate_change/items/7516.php. Accessed Aug 2013.
  9. Verloo, M., & Roggeband, C. (1996). Gender impact assessment: The development of a new instrument in the Netherlands. Impact Assessment, 14, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Vinz, D. (2009). Gender and sustainable consumption: A German environmental perspective. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 16, 159–179.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506808101764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wansink, B., Cheney, M. M., & Chan, N. (2003). Exploring comfort food preferences across gender and age. Physiology and Behavior, 79(4–5), 739–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Weller, I. (2004). Nachhaltigkeit und Gender. Neue Perspektiven für die Gestaltung und Nutzung von Produkten [Gender and sustainability: New perspectives for the control and use of products]. Munich: Ökom Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Women’s Environmental Network (WEN). (2007). Women’s manifesto on climate change. Jointly issued by the National Federation of Women’s Institutes (NFWI) and Women’ s Environmental Network (WEN). http://www.wunrn.com/news/2007/09_07/09_10_07/091607_womens_files/091607_womens.pdf. Accessed Aug 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Food ScienceUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand