Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

2019 Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Food Labeling

  • Sven Ove HanssonEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_317

Synonyms

Introduction

The Roman town Pompeii was famous for its garum, a type of fish sauce. In one of the shops where it was sold, archaeologists have found a jar marked “kosher garum.” It must have contained garum prepared according to Jewish rules, excluding shellfish and other nonkosher ingredients (Berdowski 2006, p. 249). Obviously, it was labelled because it would otherwise have been difficult to distinguish from a nonkosher garum. In modern terms, being kosher was a credence attribute of the fish sauce. By this is meant that the customer herself could not determine whether the garum had the attribute or not; she would simply have to rely on the merchant.

Today, food labelling is much more common than in the Roman era. One reason for this may be that consumers are now more concerned with credence attributes of food. Another plausible reason is the increasing length of food distribution chains....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams, R. J. (2010). Prescription drug labeling and “over-warning”: The disturbing case of Diana Levine and Wyeth pharmaceutical. Business and Society Review, 115, 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballet, J., & Carimentrand, A. (2010). Fair trade and the depersonalization of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berdowski, P. (2006). Garum of Herod the Great (a Latin-Greek inscription on the Amphora from Masada). Analecta Archaeologica Ressoviensia, 1, 239–257.Google Scholar
  4. Cheftel, J. C. (2005). Food and nutrition labelling in the European Union. Food Chemistry, 93, 531–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eden, S. (2011). Food labels as boundary objects: How consumers make sense of organic and functional foods. Public Understanding of Science, 20, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Klompenhouwer, T., & Van Den Belt, H. (2003). Regulating functional foods in the European Union: Informed choice versus consumer protection? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 16, 545–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty. London: Parker.Google Scholar
  9. Mills, E. N. C., Valovirta, E., Madsen, C., Taylor, S. L., Vieths, S., Anklam, E., Baumgartner, S., Koch, P., Crevel, R. W. R., & Frewer, L. (2004). Information provision for allergic consumers – Where are we going with food allergen labelling? Allergy, 59, 1262–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Renard, M.-C. (2010). In the name of conservation: CAFÉ practices and fair trade in Mexico. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Resnik, D. (2010). Trans fat bans and human freedom. The American Journal of Bioethics, 10, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Siipi, H., & Uusitalo, S. (2008). Consumer autonomy and sufficiency of GMF labeling. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21, 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Philosophy, Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholm and Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden