Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

2019 Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Industrial Food Animal Production Ethics

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_200



Over the past 50 years, animal agriculture in the United States (USA) has transformed from an extensive model characterized by many small family farms to an intensive, industrialized model. This industrial model – sometimes called “Industrial Farm Animal Production” (IFAP) or more colloquially “factory farming” – is characterized by frequent corporate ownership, economic consolidation, and vertical integration; the extreme confinement of large numbers of animals; the use of “technological sanders” such as growth-promoting antibiotics; the use and long-distance transport of remotely grown concentrated feedstuffs, instead of forage or pasture-based feeding; and tight control over the breeding, feeding, and living conditions of animals so as to achieve the greatest production at the lowest cost and in the shortest amount of time (Singer 2002; Singer...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Akhtar, A., Greger, M., Ferdowsian, H., & Frank, E. (2009). Health professionals’ roles in animal agriculture, climate change, and human health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(2), 182–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Dietetic Association (ADA). (2009). Position of the American dietetic association: Vegetarian diets. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(7), 1266–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). (2005). A comprehensive review of housing for pregnant sows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 227(10), 1580–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). (2008, August 26). AVMA responds to ‘Prop 2’ [online resource]. https://www.avma.org/News/JAVMANews/Pages/081001a.aspx#avmaprop2. Accessed 22 Oct 2012.
  5. American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). (2009, November). Response to the final report of the Pew commission on industrial farm animal production. https://www.avma.org/Advocacy/National/Other/Pages/Executive-Summary-of-the-AVMA-response-to-the-final-report-of-the-Pew-Commission-on-Industrial-Farm-Animal-Production.aspx. Accessed 22 Oct 2012.
  6. Animal Agriculture Alliance. Animal Agriculture: Myths and Facts. (n.d.). In Susan J. Armstrong & Richard G. Botzler (Eds.), The animal ethics reader (pp. 191–198). New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
  7. Brei, A. T. (2012, March 11). Rights and nature: Approaching environmental issues by way of human rights. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. Published Online First,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-012-9385-z.
  8. Cohen, C. (2001). Defense of the use of animals. In C. Cohen & T. Regan (Eds.), The animal rights debate. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Craig, W. J. (2009). Health effects of vegan diets. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(5), 1627S–1633S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeGrazia, D. (1996). Taking animals seriously. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeGrazia, D. (2009). Moral vegetarianism from a very broad basis. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 6, 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donovan, J. (2007). Animal rights and feminist theory. In J. Donovan & C. Adams (Eds.), The feminist care tradition in animal ethics (pp. 58–86). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Foer, J. S. (2009). Eating animals. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  14. Frey, R. G. (1983). Rights, killing and suffering. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Garner, R. (2005). Animal ethics. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Garrett, J. R. (2007). Utilitarianism, vegetarianism and human health: A response to the causal impotence objection. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(3), 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. George, K. P. (1994). Use and abuse revisited: Response to Pluhar and Varner. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 7(1), 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodland, R., & Anhang, J. (2009). Livestock and climate change. World Watch Magazine, 22(6), 10–19.Google Scholar
  19. Greger, M. (2006). Bird flu: A virus of our own hatching. Herndon: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
  20. Gruen, L. (2007). Empathy and vegetarian commitments. In J. Donovan & C. Adams (Eds.), The feminist care tradition in animal ethics (pp. 333–343). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Harman, E. (2011). The moral significance of animal pain and animal death. In T. L. Beauchamp & R. G. Frey (Eds.), The oxford handbook of animal ethics (pp. 726–737). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Human Rights Watch. (2004). Blood, sweat and fear. New York: Human Rights Watch. http://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/01/24/blood-sweat-and-fear-0. Accessed 22 Oct 2012.
  23. Humane Methods of Slaughter Act (United States of America). 7 U.S.C. 1901–1907. http://www.animallaw.info/statutes/stusfd7usca1901.htm
  24. Humane Society of the United States. (2012). Farm animal statistics: Slaughter totals.http://www.humanesociety.org/news/resources/research/stats_slaughter_totals.html. Accessed 22 Oct 2012.
  25. Hyder, J. A., et al. (2009). Adopting a plant-based diet minimally increased food costs in WHEL study. American Journal of Health Behavior, 33(5), 530–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jamieson, D. (2003). Animal liberation is an environmental ethic. In Morality’s progress (pp. 197–212). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Leahy, M. P. T. (1993). Against liberation: Putting animals in perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Matheny, G. (2003). Least harm: A defense of vegetarianism from Stephen Davis’ omnivorous proposal. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 16, 505–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mellon, M., Benbrook, C., & Benbrook, K. L. (2001). Hogging it: Estimates of antimicrobial abuse in livestock. Rep. Union of Concerned Scientists Publications. http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_agriculture/our-failing-food-system/industrial-agriculture/hogging-it-estimates-of.html. Accessed 16 Oct 2012.
  30. Neumann, G., Noda, T., & Kawaoka, Y. (2009). Emergence and pandemic potential of swine-origin H1N1 influenza virus. Nature, 459, 931–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nobis, N. (2004). Carl Cohen's “kind” argument for animal rights and against human rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pimentel, D., & Pimentel, M. (2003). Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78, 660S–663S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pluhar, E. (1995). Beyond prejudice. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Putting meat on the table: Industrial farm animal production in America. Rep. PEW Charitable Trusts, 29 April 2008. http://www.ncifap.org/reports/. Accessed 16 Oct 2012. Please also see individual committee reports issued to the commission. http://www.ncifap.org/reports/
  35. Regan, T. (2001). The case for animal rights. In C. Cohen & T. Regan (Eds.), The animal rights debate. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  36. Regan, T. (2004). The case for animal rights. Los Angeles: University of California Press 1st ed. 1983.Google Scholar
  37. Rollin, B. (2009). Veterinary ethics and production diseases. Animal Health Research Reviews, 10(2), 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rowlands, M. (2002). Animals like us. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  39. Singer, P. (1980). Utilitarianism and vegetarianism. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 9(4), 325–337.Google Scholar
  40. Singer, P. (1993). Practice ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Singer, P. (2002). Animal liberation. New York: HarperCollins 1st ed. 1975).Google Scholar
  42. Singer, P., & Mason, J. (2006). The ethics of what we eat: Why our food choices matter. Emmaus: Rodale Press.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, W. (2010). A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy: The human cost of the animal rights movement. New York: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
  44. United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (UN FAO). (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options.ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/a0701e/a0701e00.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2012.
  45. United States Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2010, March 4). Report #GAO-10-487T: Humane methods of slaughter act: Weaknesses in USDA enforcement. http://www.gao.gov. Accessed 17 Oct 2012.
  46. Varner, G. (1998). Nature’s interests? Interests, animal rights, and environmental ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Walker, P., Rhubart-Berg, P., McKenzie, S., Kelling, K., & Lawrence, R. S. (2005). Public health implications of meat production and consumption. Public Health Nutrition, 8(4), 348–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HJF-DAIDS, A Division of the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc.NIAID, NIH, DHHSBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Community Health and PreventionDrexel University School of Public HealthPhiladelphiaUSA