Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

2019 Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Food Security in Systemic Context

  • Kirsten Valentine CadieuxEmail author
  • Renata Blumberg
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_11

Synonyms

Introduction

Food security has become an increasingly prominent topic in the last four decades, given escalating concerns related to volatile food prices, climate instability (and related crop unpredictability), and losses of resilience in agroecological and institutional food systems related to the restructuring of global agri-food regimes. While the most austere definitions of food security equate being food secure with the availability of some number of calories, more systemic definitions describe food security as being “a situation in which all community residents obtain a safe, culturally acceptable, nutritionally adequate diet through a sustainable food system that maximizes community self-reliance and social justice” (Hamm and Bellows 2003, p. 37).

As the flagship...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Cullather, N. (2010). The hungry world: America’s Cold War battle against poverty in Asia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Davis, M. (2000). Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the making of the Third World. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. DeRose, L., Messer, E., & Millman, S. (1998). Who’s hungry? And how do we know. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  4. FAO. (2003). Trade reforms and food security: Conceptualizing the linkages. Rome: Commodity Policy and Projections Service, Commodities and Trade Division. http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4671e/y4671e00.htm
  5. FrameWorks. (2005). Perceptions of the U.S. food system, commissioned by the Kellogg Foundation. http://www.wkkf.org/~/media/115A21593F2548C396AB4A5ABD5E9474/44172.PDF
  6. Hamm, M. W., & Bellows, A. C. (2003). Community food security and nutrition educators. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 35(1), 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heldke, L. (2009). Food security: Three conceptions of access—Charity, rights, and coresponsibility, Ch. 14. In L. Walter & L. E. Phoenix (Eds.), Critical food issues: Problems and state of the art solutions. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  8. Hinrichs, C. C. (2013). Regionalizing food security? Imperatives, intersections and contestations in a post-9/11 world. Journal of Rural Studies, 29, 7–18. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016712000782
  9. McMichael, P. (2011). Development and social change: A global perspective (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Moseley, W. G., Carney, J., & Becker, L. (2010). Neoliberal policy, rural livelihoods, and urban food security in West Africa: A comparative study of The Gambia, Côte d’Ivoire, and Mali. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(13), 5774–5779. http://www.pnas.org/content/107/13/5774.full.pdf+html
  11. Poppendieck, J. (1999). Sweet charity? Emergency food and the end of entitlement. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Rocha, C., & Lessa, I. (2009). Urban governance for food security: The alternative food system in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. International Planning Studies, 14(4), 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schanbacher, W. D. (2010). The politics of food: The global conflict between food security and food sovereignty. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  14. Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlements and deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Slocum, R. (2006). Whiteness, space and alternative food practice. Geoforum, 38(2), 327–349.Google Scholar
  16. Thompson, E. P. (1971). The moral economy of the English crowd in the 18th century. Past & Present, 50, 76–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. World Bank. (2008). World Bank development report 2008: Agriculture for development. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDRS/Resources/477365-1327599046334/WDR_00_book.pdf (See also the 2009 Journal of Peasant Studies special issue 36(3) about this report).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Sociology and Geography, Society and EnvironmentUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geography, Society and EnvironmentUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA