Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund


Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_88-2


Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius, a late ancient Roman thinker, profoundly influenced western medieval philosophy, literature, and the liberal arts. Boethius translated and commented on a number of important Aristotelian logical works. These translations and commentaries provided the foundations for early medieval logic, philosophy of language, and metaphysics. Boethius’ short theological treatises are remarkable for the way in which they apply Greek philosophical concepts to Christian doctrine. His Consolation of Philosophy is a vivid synthesis of Stoic, Aristotelian, and especially Neoplatonic ethics and philosophical theology. It is a masterpiece, whose literary qualities as well as its philosophical material have influenced generations of humanists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


Primary Sources

  1. Boethius. (1833). Topica Ciceronis commentaria. In J. C. Orelli (Ed.), Cicero Opera Omnia, V 1. Turin: Orelli, Fuesslini & Co..Google Scholar
  2. Boethius. (1867). De institutione musica libri quinque (ed.: Friedlein, G.). Leipzig: Teubner..Google Scholar
  3. Boethius. (1880). Commentarii in librum Aristotelis Peri Hermenias (ed.: Meiser, C.). Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
  4. Boethius. (1891). Opera. In J. P. Migne et al. (Eds.), Patrologiae cursus completas, series latina, 64. Paris: Migne.Google Scholar
  5. Boethius. (1906). In Isagogen Porphyrii commentorum. In S. Brandt (Ed.), Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, 48. Vienna: F. Tempsky.Google Scholar
  6. Boethius. (1990). De topicis differentiis. In D. Z. Nikitas (Ed.), De topicis differentiis und die byzantinische Rezeption dieses Werkes: Anhang, Eine Pachymeres-Weiterbearbeitung der Holobolos-Übersetzung, Corpus Philosophorum Medii Aevi Philosophi Byzantini 5. Athens/Paris: The Academy of Athens/Librairie J. Vrin.Google Scholar
  7. Boethius. (1995). De institutione arithmetica (ed. & trans.: Guillaumin, J.Y.). Belles Lettres, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Boethius. (1998). De Divisione liber: critical edition, translation, prolegomena, and commentary (ed. & trans.: Magee, J.). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  9. Boethius. (2000). De Consolatione Philosophiae/Opscula Theologica (ed.: Moreschini, C.). Munich: Saur.Google Scholar
  10. Boethius. (2008a). De syllogismo categorico: Critical edition with introduction, translation, notes, and indexes. In C. T. Thörnqvist (Ed.), Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia 68. Gothenborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  11. Boethius. (2008b). Introductio ad syllogismos categoricos: Critical edition with introduction, commentary, and indexes. In C. T. Thörnqvist (Ed.), Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia 69. Gothenborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  12. Eleonore, S. (Trans.). (1978). Boethius’s ‘De topicis differentiis’. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Eleonore, S. (Trans.). (1988). Boethius’s ‘in Ciceronis Topica’. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Folkerts, M. (Ed.). (1970). “Boethius” Geometrie II: Ein mathematisches Lehrbuch des Mittelalters, Boethius: Texte und Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der exakten Wissenschaften 9. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
  15. Minio-Paluello, L. et al. (Eds.). (1961–1975). Aristoteles Latinus (Vols. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6). Bruges/Paris: Desclée De Brouwer (and later Brill, Leiden).Google Scholar
  16. Norman, K. (Trans.). (1998) .Boethius on Aristotle’s ‘on interpretation’ 9. In D. Blank, & N. Kretzmann (Eds. & Trans.), Ammonius on Aristotle’s ‘on interpretation’ 9 with Boethius on Aristotle’s ‘on interpretation’ 9. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Relihan Joel, C. (Trans.). (2001). Boethius, ‘consolation of philosophy’. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  18. Scott, M. (Trans.). (1991). Boethius’s De hebdomadibus (How can substances be good in virtue of the fact that they have being when they are not substantial goods?). In S. MacDonald (Ed.), Being and goodness: The concept of the good in metaphysics and philosophical theology (pp. 299–304). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Spade Paul, V. (Trans.). (1994). Five texts on the mediaeval problem of universals. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  20. Stewart, H. F., Rand, E. K., & Tester, S. J. (Eds. & Trans.). (1973). Boethius: Tractates; The consolation of philosophy, Loeb Classical Library 74. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Chadwick, H. (1981). Boethius: The consolations of music, logic, theology, and philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Courcelle, P. (1948). Les Lettres Grecques en Occident de Macrobe à Cassiodore. Paris: E. de Boccard (English trans. Courcelle, P. (1969). Late Latin writers and their greek sources. (trans.: Wedeck, H. E.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  3. De Rijk, L. M. (1988). On Boethius’s notion of being. In N. Kretzmann (Ed.), Meaning and inference in medieval philosophy: Studies in memory of Jan Pinborg (pp. 1–29). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  4. Ebbesen, S. (1990). Boethius as an Aristotelian commentator. In R. Sorabji (Ed.), Aristotle transformed: The ancient commentators and their influence (pp. 373–391). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Galonnier, A. (Ed.). (2003). Boèce ou la chaîne des savoirs. Louvain/Paris: Éditions Peeters.Google Scholar
  6. Gersh, S. (1986). Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism, the Latin tradition, 2 vols. Notre Dame: The University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gibson, M. (Ed.). (1981). Boethius: His life, thought and influence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Gracia, J. J. E. (1984). Introduction to the problem of individuation in the early middle ages. Munich/Vienna/Washington, DC: Philosophia/The Catholic University Press of America.Google Scholar
  9. Gruber, J. (1978). Kommentar zu Boethius De Consolatione Philosophiae, Texte und Kommentare – eine altertumswissenschaftliche Reihe 9. Berlin/New York: Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Hadot, P. (1959). Un fragment du commentaire perdu de Boèce sur les Catégories d’Aristote dans le Codex Bernensis 363. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age, 26, 11–27.Google Scholar
  11. Hadot, P. (1963). La Distinction de l’Être et de l’Étant dans le “De Hebdomadibus” de Boèce. In P. Wilpert (Ed.), Die Metaphysik im Mittelalter: Ihr Ursprung und Ihre Bedeutung (Miscellanea Mediaevalia 2) (pp. 147–153). Berlin: Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Hoenen, M., & Nauta, L. (Eds.). (1997). Boethius in the Middle Ages: Latin and vernacular traditions of the Consolatio philosophiae. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  13. King, P. (2000). The problem of individuation in the Middle Ages. Theoria, 66, 159–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. King, P. (2011). Boethius’s anti-realist arguments. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 40, 381–401.Google Scholar
  15. MacDonald, S. (1988). Boethius’s claim that all substances are good. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 70, 245–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Magee, J. (1989). Boethius on signification and mind, Philosophia Antiqua 52. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  17. Marenbon, J. (2003). Boethius, great medieval thinkers series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Marenbon, J. (Ed.). (2009). The Cambridge companion to Boethius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Martin, C. J. (1991). The logic of negation in Boethius. Phronesis, 36, 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nash-Marshall, S. (2000). Participation and the good: A study in Boethian metaphysics. New York: Crossroads.Google Scholar
  21. Obertello, L. (1974). Severino Boezio. Genoa: Academia Ligure di Scienze e Lettere.Google Scholar
  22. Relihan, J. (2007). The prisoner’s philosophy: Life and death in Boethius’s ‘consolation’. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  23. Schrimpf, G. (1966). Die Axiomenschrift des Boethius (De hebdomadibus) als philosophisches Lehrbuch des Mittelalters. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  24. Shiel, J. (1958). Boethius’ commentaries on Aristotle. Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies, 4, 217–244 (Revised and reprinted in Sorabji, R. (ed.). (1990). Aristotle transformed: The ancient commentators and their influence (pp. 349–372). Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBrooklyn College of The City University of New YorkBrooklynUSA