Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Peter Auriol

  • Christopher Schabel
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_377-2

Abstract

The French Franciscan Peter Auriol (c. 1280–1322) taught at Bologna, Toulouse, and finally Paris, where he lectured on the Sentences in 1317–1318 and remained as master until 1321, when he was made archbishop of Aix-en-Provence shortly before his death. Auriol composed popular treatises on poverty, natural philosophy, and the Immaculate Conception, various sets of questions on the Sentences, an important Quodlibet, and a significant Bible commentary. In his Sentences questions and Quodlibet – especially his great Scriptum on I Sentences – his explicit attacks on Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, and other giants, his proud independence, his provocative originality, and his general brilliance made Auriol perhaps the most influential Parisian theologian in the period after Scotus, although this influence was often negative. Auriol had a broad readership into the seventeenth century, and his works were printed frequently from the 1470s to 1695. Auriol is best known for his positions on universals, cognition, divine foreknowledge, grace, and predestination. His systematic approach allows us to trace common threads in his doctrine: conceptualism and the rejection of realism, a strong emphasis on contingency and a thorough denial of determinism, and a strict interpretation of divine simplicity and necessity. His appeal to creative devices and terms to construct his theories, among them “apparent being,” “indistance,” and “indistinction,” make his opinions immediately recognizable in the works of his successors, who more often than not argued against him.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. See also the Peter Auriol Homepage: http://www.peterauriol.net

Primary Sources

  1. (1956) Commentariorum in primum librum Sententiarum pars prima et secunda. Rome.Google Scholar
  2. (1605) Commentariorum in secundum, tertium, et quartum libros Sententiarum et Quodlibeti tomus secundus. Rome.Google Scholar
  3. Aureoli, P. (1952–1956). In E. M. Buytaert (Ed.), Scriptum super primum Sententiarum, Prologue – Distinction VIII (2 vols). St. Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute (diplomatic edition from manuscript Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Borghese 329).Google Scholar
  4. Boehner, P. (1948). Notitia intuitiva of non-existents according to Peter Aureoli, OFM (1322). Franciscan Studies, 8, 388–416 (edition of Reportatio I, prologue, q. 1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, S. F. (1995). Petrus Aureoli: De unitate conceptus entis (Reportatio Parisiensis in I Sententiarum, dist. 2, p. 1, qq. 1–3 et p. 2, qq. 1–2). Traditio, 50, 199–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buytaert, E. M. (1955). Aureoli’s unpublished Reportatio III, d. 3, q. 1–2. Franciscan Studies, 15, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cera (Ceva) Bonifacius (Ed.) (1511). Firmamenta trium ordinum beatissimi Patris nostri sancti Francisci (Vol. IV, ff. 116r–129r). Paris (edition of De paupertate et paupere usu rerum).Google Scholar
  8. Duba, W. O. (2009). Peter Auriol the rhetorician: A recently discovered treatise on rhetorical figures. Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 51, 63–73 (link to edition of Enoraciones verborum: http://www.peterauriol.net/auriol-pdf/AuriolExornaciones.pdf).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fr Gulielmi Guarre, Fr Ioannis Duns Scoti, Fr Petri Aureoli. (1904). Quaestiones disputatae de immaculata conceptione beatae Mariae Virginis (ed.: Lemmen) (pp. 23–153). Quaracchi: Collegium S. Bonaventurae (editions of De conceptione beatae Mariae Virginis and Repercussorium editum contra adversarium innocentiae matris Dei).Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, R. L., Nielsen, L. O., Schabel, C. (Eds.) (2000). Scriptum in primum librum Sententiarum. http://www.peterauriol.net (continuing Buytaert’s effort with Vatican, Borghese 329, but sometimes as a critical edition from many manuscripts).
  11. Nielsen, L. O. (2000). The debate between Peter Auriol and Thomas Wylton on theology and virtue. Vivarium, 38(1), 35–98 (edition of two miscellaneous questions).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nielsen, L. O. (2007). The quodlibet of Peter Auriol. In C. Schabel (Ed.), Theological quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The fourteenth century (pp. 277–331). Leiden: Brill (edition of Quodlibet, q. 7).Google Scholar
  13. Pasnau, R. (2002). Mind and knowledge (the Cambridge translations of medieval philosophical texts III). Cambridge: CUP (trans with Bolyard C of Scriptum I, proloque, q. 2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schabel, C. (2000a). Place, space, and the physics of grace in Auriol’s Sentences commentary. Vivarium, 38(1), 117–161 (edition of II Sent., d. 2, pars 3, q. 1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Seeboeck, P. (Ed.). (1896). Compendium sensus litteralis totius divinae Scripturae a clarissimo theologo fr. Petro Aureoli O. Min. Quaracchi: Collegium S. Bonaventurae.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Adriaenssen, H. T. (2017). Representation and scepticism from Aquinas to Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, S. F. (1964). The unity of the concept of being in Peter Aureoli’s Scriptum and Commentarium (with a critical edition of the Commentarium text). PhD dissertation, University of Louvain.Google Scholar
  3. Dreiling, R. (1913). Der Konzeptualismus in der Universalienlehre des Franziskanerbischofs Petrus Aureoli (Pierre d’Auriole). Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
  4. Duba, W. O. (2012). The legacy of the Bologna studium in Peter Auriol’s hylomorphism. In K. Emery, W. C. Courtenay, & S. M. Metzger (Eds.), Philosophy and theology in the studia of the religious orders and at papal and royal courts (pp. 277–302). Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duba, W. O., & Schabel, C. (2017). Remigio, Scotus, Auriol, and the myth of the two-year Sentences lecture at Paris. Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales, 84, 143–179.Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, R. L. (1997). Conceiving and modifying reality: Some modist roots of Peter Auriol’s theory of concept formation. In C. Marmo (Ed.), Vestigia, imagines, verba: Semiotics and logic in medieval theological texts (XII–XIV century) (pp. 305–321). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  7. Friedman, R. L. (1999). Peter Auriol on intentions and essential predication. In S. Ebbesen & R. L. Friedman (Eds.), Medieval analyses in language and cognition (pp. 415–430). Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, R. L. (2002). Peter Auriol. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/auriol/.Google Scholar
  9. Friedman, R. L. (2013). Intellectual traditions in the medieval university: The use of philosophical psychology in Trinitarian theology among the Franciscans and Dominicans, 1250–1350. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, R. L., & Nielsen, L. O. (Eds.) (2000). Vivarium, 38(1) Special issue: Peter Auriol with contributions by Bolyard C, Conti AD, Duba WO, Friedman RL, Nielsen LO, and Schabel C.Google Scholar
  11. Halverson, J. L. (1998). Peter Aureol on predestination. A challenge to late medieval thought. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  12. Henninger, M. (1989). Relations: Medieval theories, 1250–1325. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  13. Heynck, V. (1969). Die Kommentare des P. Aureoli zum dritten Sentenzenbuch. Franziskanische Studien, 51, 1–77.Google Scholar
  14. Hoffmann, T. (2015). Peter Auriol on free choice and free judgment. Vivarium, 53, 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Licka, L. (2016). Perception and objective being: Peter Auriol on perceptual acts and their objects. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 90, 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nielsen, L. O. (1996). Dictates of faith versus dictates of reason: Peter Auriole on divine power, creation, and human rationality. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 7, 213–241.Google Scholar
  17. Nielsen, L. O. (2002). Peter Auriol’s way with words. The genesis of Peter Auriol’s commentaries on Peter Lombard’s first and fourth books of the Sentences. In G. R. Evans (Ed.), Mediaeval commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard (pp. 149–219). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  18. Nielsen, L. O. (2003). Peter Auriol. In J. J. E. Gracia & T. Noone (Eds.), A companion to philosophy in the Middle Ages (pp. 494–503). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Schabel, C. (2000b). Theology at Paris 1316–1345. Peter Auriol and the problem of divine foreknowledge and future contingents. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Schabel, C. (2003). Divine foreknowledge and human freedom: Auriol, Pomponazzi, and Luther on ‘Scholastic subtleties’. In R. L. Friedman & L. O. Nielsen (Eds.), The medieval heritage in early modern metaphysics and modal logic, 1400–1700 (pp. 165–189). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schabel, C. (2006). Philosophy and theology across cultures: Gersonides and Auriol on divine foreknowledge. Speculum, 81(3), 1092–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schabel, C. (2009). Auriol’s rubrics: Citations of university theologians in Peter Auriol’s Scriptum in Primum Librum Sententiarum. In S. F. Brown, T. Dewender, & T. Kobusch (Eds.), Philosophical debates at Paris in the early fourteenth century (pp. 3–38). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  23. Tachau, K. H. (1988). Vision and certitude in the age of Ockham: Optics, epistemology and the foundation of semantics 1250–1345. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  24. Teetaert, A. (1935). Pierre Auriol. Dictionnaire de Theologie Catholique, 12(2), cols. 1810–1881.Google Scholar
  25. Wöller, F. (2015). Theologie und Wissenschaft bei Petrus Aureoli. Ein scholastischer Entwurf aus dem frühen 14. Jahrhundert. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History and ArchaeologyUniversity of CyprusNicosiaCyprus