Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

al-ʿĀmirī, Abū l-Ḥasan

  • Elvira Wakelnig
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_30-2

Abstract

The tenth-century Khurasani philosopher Abū l-Ḥasan Muḥammad b. Yūsuf al-ʿĀmirī was one of the last representatives of the philosophical tradition initiated by al-Kindī. His works show a strong influence of Greek philosophy, for example, the Book on the Afterlife (K. al-Amad ʿalā l-abad) draws heavily on Plato’s Phaedo and the Chapters on Metaphysical Topics (K. al-Fuṣūl al-Maʿālim al-ilāhīya) are, in fact, a paraphrase of parts of the Elements of Theology by the late Neoplatonist Proclus.

About al-ʿĀmirī’s life not much information is preserved. Although he is said to have lived under the patronage of certain rulers at given times, he is also pictured as an itinerant Sufi in one of al-Tawḥīdī’s accounts. At the beginning of his On the Afterlife, al-ʿĀmirī listed the titles of his 17 major works, five of which are known to be extant today. This list provides a good picture of the topics he wrote on, namely, logic, physics, psychology, metaphysics, ethics, biology and medicine, different religions, Sufism, and interpretation of the Qurʾān, as well as of dreams. However, it seems that he was primarily known as a metaphysician.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Al-ʿĀmirī, Abū l-Ḥasan (1988). Rasā’il Abī l-Ḥasan al-ʿĀmirī wa-shadharātuhū al-falsafīya, ed. Khalīfāt, S. Manshūrāt al-jāmiʿa al-urdunnīya, ʿAmmān (contains Inqādh al-bashar min al-jabr wa-l-qadar (249–271), al-Taqrīr li-awjuh al-taqdīr (303–341), K. al-Fuṣūl fī l-maʿālim al-ilāhīya (363–379), al-Ibṣār wa-l-mubṣar (411–437), fragments of the commentary on the Categories (442–467) and fragments preserved in the works of al-Tawḥīdī, Miskawayh, the Muntakhab and Mukhtaṣar Ṣiwān al-ḥikma (473–524)).Google Scholar
  2. Al-ʿĀmirī, Abū l-Ḥasan (2015). Arbaʿ Rasāʾil falsafīya, ed. al-Ġānimī, S. Iṣdār jāmiʿat al-Kūfa, Najaf (contains Inqādh al-bashar min al-jabr wa-l-qadar (in two versions), al-Taqrīr li-awjuh al-taqdīr and al-Amad ʿalā l-abad).Google Scholar
  3. Al-ʿĀmirī, Abū l-Ḥasan. (1967). Kitāb al-Iʿlām bi-manāqib al-islām, ed. Ghurāb, A. al-Qāhira: Dār al-Kātib al-ʿArabī.Google Scholar
  4. Cüneyt, K. M. (2017). Bir ve çok. Âmirî Felsefesinde Tanrı ve Âlem. Istanbul: Klasik (contains al-Majālis al-sabʿ bayna al-shaykh wa-l-ʿĀmirī with Turkish translation).Google Scholar
  5. Rowson Everett, K. (1988). A Muslim philosopher on the soul and its fate: al-ʿĀmirī’s Kitāb al-Amad ʿalā l-abad. New Haven: American Oriental Society (with English translation).Google Scholar
  6. Turhan, K. (1996). Bir ahlak problemi olarak kelâm ve felsefe açısından insan fiileri. Marmara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi vakfı yayınları, Istanbul (contains Inqādh al-bashar min al-jabr wa-l-qadar with Turkish translation).Google Scholar
  7. Wakelnig, E. (2006). Feder, Tafel, Mensch: Al-ʿĀmirīs Kitāb al-Fuṣūl fī l-Maʿālim al-ilāhīya und die arabische Proklos-Rezeption im 10. Jh. Leiden/Boston: Brill (with German translation).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Biesterfeldt, H. (1977). Abū l-Ḥasan al-ʿĀmirī und die Wissenschaften. ZDMG, III(1), 335–341.Google Scholar
  2. D’Ancona, C. (2006). The topic of the ‘Harmony between Plato and Aristotle’: Some examples in early Arabic philosophy. In A. Speer & L. Wegener (Eds.), Wissen über Grenzen. Arabisches Wissen und lateinisches Mittelalter (pp. 382–399, 379–405). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  3. Heck, P. (2006). The crisis of knowledge in Islam (I): The case of al-ʿĀmirī. Philosophy East and West, 56(1), 106–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaya, V. (2014). Kalām and Falsafa Integrated for Divine Unity. Saʿīd b. Dadhurmuz’s (5th/11th century) Risāla fī l-Tawḥīd. Studia Graeco-Arabica, 4, 65–123 (on al-Tabṣīr li-awjuh al-taʿbīr, p. 82, n. 82).Google Scholar
  5. Kaya, M. C. (2015). A new source for Al-ʿĀmirī studies: al-Majālis al-sabʿ bayna al-Shaykh wa al-ʿĀmirī. Nazariyat Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences, 1(2), 1–34.Google Scholar
  6. Kraemer, J. (21992). Humanism in the renaissance of Islam. The cultural revival during the buyid age (pp. 233–241). Leiden/New York/Köln: Brill.Google Scholar
  7. Rowson, E. (1984). An unpublished work by al-ʿĀmirī and the date of the Arabic De Causis. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 104, 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rowson, E. (1990). The philosopher as Littérateur: Al-Tawḥīdī and his predecessors. ZGAIW, 6, 50–92.Google Scholar
  9. Wakelnig, E. (2007a). Al-ʿĀmirī’s paraphrase of the Proclean Elements of Theology. A search for possible sources and parallel texts. In C. D’Ancona (Ed.), The libraries of the Neoplatonists (pp. 457–469). Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  10. Wakelnig, E. (2007b). Metaphysics in al-ʿĀmirī. The Hierarchy of Being and the Concept of Creation. Medioevo, 32, 39–59.Google Scholar
  11. Wakelnig, E. (2008a). Al-ʿĀmirī on vision and the visible. Variations on traditional visual theories. In A. Akasoy & W. Raven (Eds.), Islamic thought in the middle ages. Studies in text, transmission and translation, in honour of Hans Daiber (pp. 413–430). Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wakelnig, E. (2008b). Philosophical fragments of al-ʿĀmirī preserved mainly in al-Tawḥīdī, Miskawayh and the texts of the Ṣiwān al-ḥikma tradition. In P. Adamson (Ed.), In the Age of al-Fārābī: Arabic philosophy in the fourth/tenth century (Warburg Institute Colloquia) (pp. 215–238). London: Warburg Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Near Eastern StudiesUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria