Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions

Living Edition
| Editors: Pedro Nuno Teixeira (Editor-in-Chief), Jung-Cheol Shin (Editor-in-Chief)

Factors Influencing Scientists’ Public Engagement

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_346-1
  • 101 Downloads

Synonyms

Definition

Scientists’ public engagement can be defined as the actions undertaken by scientists to communicate their research results and interact with the publics outside the university or science sector.

In science communication, the model of “public engagement” has replaced the “deficit model” as a solution to improve a relationship between science and society perceived as problematic. Public engagement was described as a means of restoring public trust in science and in scientific institutions, by encouraging scientists to leave the ivory tower and to engage in a two-way relationship with society. However, there are different approaches to “public engagement” which relate to different fields of academic study (i.e., policy studies, higher education studies, sociology of science, science communication). This entry, focused on the last one, will offer a discussion of the historical background for science- and technology-oriented public...

Keywords

Foster Public Engagement Science Communication Practitioners Planned Behavior States Matilda Effect PE Activities 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Besley, John. 2010. Public engagement. In Encyclopedia of science and technology communication, ed. Susanna Hornig Priest, 45–50. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Einsiedel, Edna. 2008. Public participation and dialogue. In Handbook of public communication of science and technology, ed. Massimiano Buchi and Bryan Trench, 173–184. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Goodell, Rae. 1977. The visible scientists. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
  4. Irwin, Alan. 2009. Moving forwards or in circles? Science communication and scientific governance in an age of innovation. In Investigating science communication in the information age: Implications for public engagement and popular media, ed. Richard Holliman et al., 3–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Merton, Robert K. 1968. The Matthew effect in science. Science 159 (3810): 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rossiter, Margaret. 1993. The Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science 23: 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Stilgoe, Jack, Simon Lock, and John Wildson. 2014. Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science 23: 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland