Philosophical Implications of Changes in the Classification of Mental Disorders in DSM-5

  • A. Heinz
  • E. Friedel
  • H.-P. Krüger
  • C. Wackerhagen
Living reference work entry

Abstract

The new edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-5) by the American Psychiatric Association (Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, 2013) has sparked considerable debate. Allen Frances (Saving normal: an insider’s revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life, 1st edn. William Morrow, New York, 2013) and others (Heinz A, Friedel E, Der Nervenarzt 85:571–577, 2014) have argued that this revision may increase the risk to inadequately pathologize socially unwanted behavior and to defocus psychiatric treatment. An undesirable result can be that more severely ill patients will not be adequately provided with services, while an abundance of problems of everyday life in modern societies receives a medical label. This may cause the ambivalent consequence that psychotherapeutic aid can be provided, but that social problems are individualized and isolated from their context instead of being open to social rather than medical or psychotherapeutic interventions. These concerns will be discussed with respect to three topics: firstly, it will be described how the general definition of mental disorders underwent a slight change with nevertheless considerable consequences; secondly, it will be exemplified how a loss of psychopathological traditions and a new definition of core symptoms in schizophrenia together with a lack of consideration of neurological disorders have widened the schizophrenia category to a degree that it may do more harm than good to patients; and thirdly, it will be discussed by way of example how the merging of the previously distinct categories of harmful substance use and substance dependence combines a diagnostically unreliable (harmful substance use) and a diagnostically reliable (substance dependence) clinical category resulting in a socially potentially abusive and poorly defined new category of “substance use disorders.” It is argued that the underlying changes would have deserved a more profound discussion of their philosophical as well as social implications.

Keywords

Mental Disorder Pathological Gambling Schizophrenia Patient Substance Dependence Social Impairment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn (text rev.). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreasen NC, Carpenter WT (1993) Diagnosis and classification of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 19:199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boorse C (1976) What a theory of mental health should be. J Theory Soc Behav 6:61–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter W, Strauss J, Muleh S (1973) Are there pathognomonic symptoms in schizophrenia? An empiric investigation of Schneider’s first-rank symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 28:847–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Culver CM, Gert B (1982) Philosophy in medicine: conceptual and ethical issues in medicine and psychiatry. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Cutting J (2015) First rank symptoms of schizophrenia: their nature and origin. Hist Psychiatry 26:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards G, Gross MM (1976) Alcohol dependence: provisional description of a clinical syndrome. Br Med J 1:1058–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frances AJ (2013) Saving normal: an insider’s revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, big pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life, 1st edn. William Morrow, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallagher S (2004) Neurocognitive models of schizophrenia: a neurophenomenological critique. Psychopathology 37:8–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hasin DS, O’Brien CP, Auriacombe M, Borges G, Bucholz K, Budney A, … Grant BF (2013) DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale. Am J Psychiatry 170:834–851Google Scholar
  12. Heinz A (2014) Der Begriff der psychischen Krankheit (Auflage: Originalausgabe). Suhrkamp Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. Heinz A, Friedel E (2014) DSM-5: wichtige Änderungen im Bereich der Suchterkrankungen. Nervenarzt 85:571–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heinz A, Przuntek H, Winterer G, Pietzcker A (1995) Clinical aspects and follow-up of dopamine-induced psychoses in continuous dopaminergic therapy and their implications for the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenic symptoms. Nervenarzt 66:662–669Google Scholar
  15. Heinz A, Bermpohl F, Frank M (2012) Construction and interpretation of self-related function and dysfunction in intercultural psychiatry. Migr Ment Health 27(Suppl 2):S32–S43Google Scholar
  16. Jaspers K (1946) Allgemeine Psychopathologie. Ein Leitfaden für Studierende, Ärzte und Psychologen, 4th edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Kant I (1986) Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Reclam, Philipp, jun. GmbH, Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  18. Klee E (2006) Dokumente zur » Euthanasie « im NS-Staat, 6th edn. Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  19. Marneros A (1988) Schizophrenic first-rank symptoms in organic mental disorders. Br J Psychiatry 152:625–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mellor CS (1970) First rank symptoms of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 117:15–23Google Scholar
  21. Mishara AL, Lysaker PH, Schwartz MA (2014) Self-disturbances in schizophrenia: history, phenomenology, and relevant findings from research on metacognition. Schizophr Bull 40:5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Müller DS, Walter H, Kunze H, Konrad N, Heinz A (2012) Zwangsbehandlungen unter Rechtsunsicherheit. Nervenarzt 83:1150–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oliva F, Dalmotto M, Pirfo E, Furlan PM, Picci RL (2014) A comparison of thought and perception disorders in borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia: psychotic experiences as a reaction to impaired social functioning. BMC Psychiatry 14. doi:10.1186/s12888-014-0239-2Google Scholar
  24. Plessner H (1975) Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch. Einleitung in die philosophische Anthropologie (3. Unveränd.). de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. Plessner H (2003) Der kategorische Konjunktiv. Ein Versuch über die Leidenschaft. In: Gesammelte Schriften in zehn Bänden: VIII: Conditio humana. (Vol. 8, pp. 338–352). Frankfurt/M: suhrkamp taschenbuch wissenschaft.Google Scholar
  26. Rumpf H-J, Kiefer F (2011) DSM-5: removal of the distinction between dependence and abuse and the opening for behavioural addictions. Sucht 57:45–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sartorius N (2011) Meta effects of classifying mental disorders. In: Regier DA, Narrow WE, Kuhl EA, Kupfer D (eds) The conceptual evolution of DSM 5. American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, pp 59–80Google Scholar
  28. Sass LA, Parnas J (2003) Schizophrenia, consciousness, and the self. Schizophr Bull 29:427–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schacht JP, Anton RF, Myrick H (2013) Functional neuroimaging studies of alcohol cue reactivity: a quantitative meta-analysis and systematic review. Addict Biol 18:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schneider K (1942) Psychischer Befund und psychiatrische Diagnose. Thieme, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  31. Schramme T (2000) Patienten und Personen: Zum Begriff der psychischen Krankheit. FISCHER Taschenbuch, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  32. Shinn AK, Heckers S, Öngür D (2013) The special treatment of first rank auditory hallucinations and bizarre delusions in the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 146:17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soares-Weiser K, Maayan N, Bergman H, Davenport C, Kirkham AJ, Grabowski S, Adams CE (2015) First rank symptoms for schizophrenia (Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Review). Schizophr Bull sbv061Google Scholar
  34. Sousa P, Swiney L (2011) Thought insertion: abnormal sense of thought agency or thought endorsement? Phenomenol Cogn Sci 12:637–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spitzer M (1988) Ichstörungen: in search of a theory. In: Spitzer M, Uehlein F, Oepen G (eds) Psychopathology and philosophy. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Voss M (2013) The experience of agency: an interplay between prediction and postdiction. Front Psychol 4. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00127Google Scholar
  37. Tandon R, Gaebel W, Barch DM, Bustillo J, Gur RE, Heckers S, … Carpenter W (2013) Definition and description of schizophrenia in the DSM-5. Schizophr Res 150:3–10Google Scholar
  38. UNBRK (2008) aus un.org: Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil II, 35, Bonn. Gesetz zu dem Übereinkommen der Vereinten Nationen vom 13. Dezember 2006 über die Rechte von Menschen mit Behinderungen. Bonn. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/Depts/german/uebereinkommen/ar61106-dbgbl.pdf
  39. United Nations (2006) Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml. Retrieved 6 May 2015
  40. Wakefield JC (2007) The concept of mental disorder: diagnostic implications of the harmful dysfunction analysis. World Psychiatry 6:149–156Google Scholar
  41. World Health Organization (1992) The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Heinz
    • 1
  • E. Friedel
    • 1
  • H.-P. Krüger
    • 2
  • C. Wackerhagen
    • 1
  1. 1.Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Campus Charité MitteCharité-Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Politische Philosophie und Philosophische AnthropologieUniversität PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations