Ceramics: Rethinking Olmec Pottery

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7747-7_9740
After 1200 BCE (years presented in this entry are uncalibrated), distinctive ceramic vessels – Olmec pottery – appeared at select sites across the vast region that anthropologists refer to as Mesoamerica (southern Mexico, Belize, Guatemala, and eastern Honduras; Fig. 1). While exchange and interaction between regions existed prior to this time, in the case of Olmec pottery, the ceramic vessels display a consistent iconography that often contrasts with local pottery traditions. The iconography exhibited on Olmec pottery may represent developing religious beliefs, cosmology, and ideology, elements of which can be found in subsequent Mesoamerican groups. While features of religion and cosmology existed prior to 1200 BCE, Olmec pottery synthesizes and abstracts these concepts on durable materials. As such, understanding the origin and spread of Olmec pottery has important implications on the nature of Mesoamerican civilization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Blomster, J. P. (1998). Context, cult, and early formative public ritual in the Mixteca Alta: Analysis of a hollow baby figurine from Etlatongo, Oaxaca. Ancient Mesoamerica, 9(2), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blomster, J. P. (2002). What and where is Olmec style? Regional perspective on hollow figurines in early formative Mesoamerica. Ancient Mesoamerica, 13(2), 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blomster, J. P. (2004). Etlatongo: Social complexity, interaction, and village life in the Mixteca Alta of Oaxaca, Mexico. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  4. Blomster, J. P., Hector, N., & Glascock, M. D. (2005). Olmec pottery production and export in ancient Mexico determined through elemental analysis. Science, 307, 1068–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheetham, D. (2010). Cultural imperatives in clay: Early Olmec carved pottery from San Lorenzo and Canton Corralito. Ancient Mesoamerica, 21(1), 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, J. E. (1991). The beginnings of Mesoamerica: apología for the soconusco early formative. In W. L. Fowler (Ed.), The formation of complex society in Southeastern Mesoamerica (pp. 13–26). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, J. E., & Pye, M. E. (2000). The pacific coast and the Olmec question. In J. E. Clark & M. E. Pye (Eds.), Olmec art and archaeology in Mesoamerica (pp. 217–251). Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art.Google Scholar
  8. Coe, M. D. (1965). The Olmec style and its distribution. In R. Wauchope & G. R. Willey (Eds.), Handbook of middle American Indians, archaeology of Southern Mesoamerica (Vol. 3, Part 2, pp. 739–775). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  9. Coe, M. D. (1968). America’s first civilization. New York: American Heritage Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Coe, M. D., & Diehl, R. A. (1980). In the land of the Olmec (The archaeology of San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán, Vol. 1). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  11. Covarrubias, M. (1957). Indian art of Mexico and central America. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  12. Cyphers, A. (1996). Reconstructing Olmec life at San Lorenzo. In E. P. Benson & B. de la Fuente (Eds.), Olmec art of ancient Mexico (pp. 61–71). Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art.Google Scholar
  13. Cyphers, A. (1997). Olmec architecture at San Lorenzo. In B. Stark & P. Arnold III (Eds.), Olmec to Aztec: Settlement patterns in the ancient Gulf Lowlands (pp. 98–114). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cyphers, A. (2012). Las bellas teorías y los terribles hechos: Controversias sobre los olmecas del Preclásico inferior. Mexico City, DF: UNAM, Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas.Google Scholar
  15. De la Fuente, B. (1992). Order and nature in Olmec art. In R. F. Townsend (Ed.), The Ancient Americas: Art from sacred landscapes (pp. 120–133). Chicago, IL: The Art Institute of Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Diehl, R. A. (2004). The Olmecs: America’s first civilization. New York: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  17. Flannery, K. V. (1968). The Olmec and the Valley of Oaxaca: A model for inter-regional interaction in formative times. In E. P. Benson (Ed.), Dumbarton Oaks conference on the Olmec (pp. 79–117). Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
  18. Flannery, K. V., & Marcus, J. (1994). Early formative pottery of the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology (Vol. 27). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  19. Flannery, K. V., et al. (2005). Implications of new petrographic analysis for the Olmec “mother culture” model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 11219–11223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grove, D. C. (1989). Olmec: What’s in a name? In R. J. Sharer & D. C. Grove (Eds.), Regional perspectives on the Olmec (pp. 8–14). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Grove, D. C. (1996). Archaeological contexts of Olmec art outside of the Gulf Coast. In E. P. Benson & B. de la Fuente (Eds.), Olmec art of ancient Mexico (pp. 105–117). Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art.Google Scholar
  22. Marcus, J. (1989). Zapotec chiefdoms and the nature of formative religions. In R. J. Sharer & D. C. Grove (Eds.), Regional perspectives on the Olmec (pp. 148–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Neff, H., & Glascock, M. D. (2002). Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis of Olmec Pottery (Report on file at the Research Reactor Center). Columbia, MO: University of Missouri.Google Scholar
  24. Neff, Hector, Jeffrey Blomster, Michael D. Glascock, Ronald L. Bishop, M. James Blackman, Michael D. Coe, George L. Cowgill, Richard A. Diehl, Stephen Houston, Arthur A. Joyce, Carl P. Lipo, Barbara L. Stark and Marcus Winter (2006a) Methodological Issues in the Provenance Investigation of Early Formative Mesoamerican Ceramics. Latin American Antiquity 17:54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neff, H., J. Blomster, M. Glascock, R. Bishop, M. Blackman, M. Coe, G. Cowgill, A. Cyphers, R. Diehl, S. Houston, A. Joyce, C. Lipo, and M. Winter (2006b) Smokescreens in the Provenance Investigation of Early Formative Mesoamerican Ceramics. Latin American Antiquity 17(1):104–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pool, C. A. (2007). Olmec archaeology and early Mesoamerica. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stoltman, J. B., et al. (2005). Petrographic evidence shows that pottery exchange between the Olmec and their neighbors was two way. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 11213–11218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Symonds, S. (2000). The ancient landscape at San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán, Veracruz, Mexico: Settlement and nature. In J. E. Clark & M. E. Pye (Eds.), Olmec art and archaeology in Mesoamerica (pp. 55–73). Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art.Google Scholar
  29. Symonds, S., Cyphers, A., & Lunagómez, R. (2002). Asentamiento Prehispánico en San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán. Mexico City, DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  30. Winter, M. C. (1972). Tierras Largas: A formative community in the Valley of Oaxaca. Ph.D. dissertation. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA