Advertisement

Design for the Value of Human Well-Being

  • Philip Brey
Reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter studies how and to what extent it is possible to design for well-being. Well-being is rarely considered in the design literature and is rarely linked to technology and design in philosophy and the social sciences. A few approaches to design for well-being have recently materialized, however, including Emotional Design, capability approaches, positive psychology approaches, and Life-Based Design. In this chapter, the notion of well-being will first be clarified and contemporary theories of and approaches to well-being will be reviewed. Next, theoretical and methodological issues in design for well-being will be discussed that must be accounted for in any successful approach. This will be followed by a review of the abovementioned four approaches to design for well-being. The chapter will conclude by considering open issues and future work in the development of design approaches for well-being.

Keywords

Well-being Design Happiness Emotional design Positive psychology 

References

  1. Amichai-Hamburger Y (ed) (2009) Technology and psychological well-being. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentham J (1996 [1789]) In: Burns J, Hart HLA (eds) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Brey P (2010) Values in technology and disclosive computer ethics. In: Floridi L (ed) The Cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brey P (2012) Well-being in philosophy, psychology and economics. In: Brey P, Briggle A, Spence E (eds) The good life in a technological age. Routledge, New York, pp 15–34Google Scholar
  5. Brey P, Briggle A, Spence E (eds) (2012) The good life in a technological age. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruni L, Porta P (2005) Economics and happiness: framings of analysis. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen J (2007) Flow in games (and everything else). Commun ACM 50:31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crisp R (2013) Well-being. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. Accessed on 2 Sep 2014 at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/well-being/
  9. Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Descartes R (1994 [1637]) Discourse on method. Everyman Paperbacks, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Desmet P, Pohlmeyer A (2013) Positive design: an introduction to design for subjective well-being. Int J Design 7(3):5–19Google Scholar
  12. Diener E (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 95:542–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener E, Lucas RE (1999) Personality and subjective well-being. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell-Sage, New York, pp 213–229Google Scholar
  14. Dittmar H (2008) Consumer society, identity, and well-being: the search for the ‘Good Life’ and the ‘Body Perfect’. Psychology Press, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedman B, Kahn P, Borning A (2006) Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Zhang P, Galletta D (eds) Human-computer interaction in management information systems: foundations. M.E. Sharpe, ArmonkGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffin J (1986) Well-being: its meaning, measurement and moral importance. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnstone J (2012) Capabilities and technology. In: Brey P, Briggle A, Spence E (eds) The good life in a technological age. Routledge, New York, pp 77–91Google Scholar
  18. Jordan P (2000) Designing pleasurable products. Taylor & Francis, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kasser T, Kanner A (eds) (2004) Psychology and consumer culture: the struggle for a good life in a materialistic world. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. King A (2003) Speed up your site: web site optimization. New Riders Press, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  21. Lebergott S (1993) Pursuing happiness: American consumers in the twentieth century. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  22. Leikas J (2009) Life-based design – a holistic approach to designing human-technology interaction, VTT Publications 726. Edita Prima, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  23. Leikas J, Saariluoma P, Heinilä J, Ylikauppila M (2013) A methodological model for life-based design. Int Rev Soc Sci Human 4(2):118–136Google Scholar
  24. Mill JS (1998[1863]) In: Crisp R (ed) Utilitarianism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Norman D (2005) Emotional design: why we love (or Hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Nussbaum M (2000) Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oosterlaken I (2009) Design for development: a capability approach. Design Stud 25(4):91–102Google Scholar
  28. Oosterlaken I, Van den Hoven J (eds) (2012) The capability approach, technology and design. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  29. Parfit D (1984) Reasons and persons. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Ruitenberg H, Desmet P (2012) Design thinking in positive psychology: the development of a product-service combination that stimulates happiness-enhancing activities. In: Brassett J, Hekkert P, Ludden G, Malpass M, McDonnell J (eds) Out of control; Proceedings of the 8th international conference on design and emotion, Central Saint Martins College of Art & Design, London, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  31. Saariluoma P, Leikas J (2010) Life-based design – an approach to design for life. Glob J Manage Bus Res 10(5):17–23Google Scholar
  32. Seligman MEP (2002) Authentic happiness: using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M (2000) Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol 55:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sen A (1980) Equality of what? In: McMurrin SM (ed) The Tanner lectures on human value. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 195–220Google Scholar
  35. Sen A (1992) Inequality Re-examined. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Turkle S (2011) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Van de Poel I (2012) Can we design for well-being? In: Brey P, Briggle A, Spence E (eds) The good life in a technological age. Routledge, New York, pp 295–306Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universiteit TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations