Abstract
Before returning to Australia from Oxford, Peter Singer (1973) concluded one of his earliest papers with the timely comment that ‘It is . . . necessary, before embarking on a discussion of morality, to make quite clear in what sense one is using terms like “moral judgment”, and what follows and what does not follow from such a use of the term. This is an essential preliminary; but it is only a preliminary. My complaint is that what should be regarded as something to be got out of the way in the introduction to a work of moral philosophy has become the subject-matter of almost the whole of moral philosophy in the English-speaking world’ (Singer 1973, p. 56). The preoccupation with linguistic analysis bemoaned by Singer would shortly give way to a global renaissance of work in normative and applied ethics, and philosophers in Australia and New Zealand have figured quite prominently in these developments while also producing cutting-edge work in metaethics and moral psychology. Although Australasian philosophy was traditionally much better known for its contributions to metaphysics than to moral philosophy, the emergence of influential work in normative ethics, metaethics and moral psychology over the last two decades has done much to raise the profile of Australasian moral philosophy internationally.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In this chapter I focus on work in moral philosophy done by philosophers working in Australia and New Zealand at the time they produced it, and so I therefore mostly exclude work done overseas by Australian- or New Zealand-born philosophers. Also, I concentrate primarily on work in the analytic rather than the continental tradition, and particularly on major developments in Australasian moral philosophy since 1950. The period in Australian philosophy prior to 1950 has been ably covered by others, such as Grave (1984), Scarlett (1992), Coady (1998), and Franklin (2003), and in Australasian philosophy more broadly, in the various entries under individual departments and topics, in Oppy and Trakakis (2010).
- 2.
In his preface to the 1981 Hackett reissue of Sidgwick’s 1874 Methods of Ethics, John Rawls comments that English moral philosophy has been dominated by Utilitarianism for over two centuries.
- 3.
For discussion of Bentham’s panopticon and its use in Port Arthur, see Driver (2007, pp. 42–43). Also, a little-known fact here is that Cambridge philosopher Henry Sidgwick, whose 1874 book The Methods of Ethics is hailed by many contemporary moral philosophers as the most fully and systematically worked out form of utilitarianism thus far developed, graduated from Rugby School in the same class as Tom Wills, who is credited with creating Australian rules football in the late 1850s by blending the rules of rugby with those of the Australian indigenous game known as ‘marn-grook’. It is intriguing to speculate about whether Wills, who also became a star cricketer for Cambridge University (and later founded the Melbourne and Geelong football clubs), consulted Sidgwick about the rules for the new game that he was devising. Sidgwick refers to various games (and especially cricket) in his writings, including in his discussion of pleasure, but there is apparently no mention of Australian football in Sidgwick’s published writings.
- 4.
Note that Peter Singer’s interest in Utilitarianism and its strong commitment to impartiality, along with his wariness of any objectivist metaethic, seems to have been influenced by his strong sense of the horrors of Nazism, which directly impacted on his parents and grandparents. See Singer’s replies in Jamieson (1999). Also, an important contribution to discussions of moral relativism is Levy (2002a).
- 5.
Also important here are Chin Liew Ten’s (1980) criticisms of Mill’s ‘proof’ of the principle of utility.
- 6.
A good example of more recent Australian work on decision theory and consequentialism is Colyvan et al. (2010).
- 7.
In his subsequent book, McCloskey (1971) discusses these criticisms in relation to Mill’s utilitarianism, and demonstrates how Mill is an act utilitarian rather than a rule utilitarian.
- 8.
The 2008 Australian Catholic University Eureka Prize for Research in Ethics was awarded to Cullity for this book, and he decided to donate the $10,000 prize money to charity (see The Age 12 October 2010).
- 9.
Michael Smith (2005) has argued that virtually all ethical theories can be understood as forms of consequentialism, at least when it is construed in a minimalist way as telling us that we ought to do that which we have most reason to do. See also Smith (2009) for a discussion of how the idea of rights as side-constraints can also be understood in consequentialist terms, and Jackson and Smith (2006).
- 10.
This book, published as part of Blackwell’s ‘Great Debates in Philosophy’ series, originated as a mini-conference on ‘Consequentialism, Kantianism, and Virtue Ethics’ held at Monash University in 1995, and featured the authors along with local speakers. The three authors cite Smart and Williams’ Utilitarianism: For and Against (1973) as ‘the closest predecessor’ to this volume.
- 11.
Mulgan currently has a chair in philosophy at the University of St Andrews, and he has recently published Understanding Utilitarianism (2007).
- 12.
- 13.
This book won the 2009 American Philosophical Association prize for the best book by a young philosopher published in the previous 2 years.
- 14.
In cases of tragic dilemmas Hursthouse holds that a decision about what to do in such a dilemma is right if and only if it is what a virtuous agent would (acting in character) decide, ‘but the action decided upon may be too terrible to be called “right” or “good”’ (1999, p. 79). Here Hursthouse also makes a valuable contribution to debates in moral philosophy about what are often called ‘evaluative remainders’ (see Stocker 1990, 1996), and about what the emotions which are usually thought appropriate in regard to such remainders (e.g. regret, remorse, or even guilt) might show about utilitarian and consequentialist approaches, which find it difficult to recognise how such emotions could be appropriate, if what the agent did was the right course of action to take.
- 15.
Hursthouse acknowledges that certain traits may serve some of these ends better than other of these ends. See also Perrett and Patterson (1991).
- 16.
Swanton’s work has also influenced, and been influenced by, other non-eudaimonist approaches to virtue ethics, such as that developed by Michael Slote (see, e.g., Slote 1992, 2001), who has been a regular visitor to the University of Auckland—though Slote’s agent-based approach differs significantly from Swanton’s target-centred account. For recent Australasian work on agent-based virtue ethics, see Cox (2006) and van Zyl (2009). In 2002 the University of Canterbury held a conference on ‘Virtue ethics: Old and New’, in which many of the world’s most prominent virtue ethicists participated, and this resulted in an important edited collection: Gardiner (2005). See also the contributions discussing virtue ethics in Pigden (ed) (2009). Other examples of Australian books on virtue ethics are van Hooft (2006, 2013).
- 17.
See also Green and Mews (eds) (2011) and Broad (forthcoming). University of NSW philosopher and mathematician James Franklin led an ARC-funded research project from 2006 to 2008 on restraint and the virtue of temperance, while Australian Catholic University philosopher Bernadette Tobin has written extensively on Aristotelian virtue and moral education: see, e.g. Tobin (1989, 2000).
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
Gaita also wrote a best-selling memoir about his childhood, Romulus My Father (Melbourne: Text, 1998), which subsequently became a highly acclaimed film.
- 22.
See also Ramsay (1997) and Oderberg and Laing (eds) (1997).
- 23.
For instance, La Trobe University philosopher Janna Thompson began teaching a semester-length subject on feminism that was widely known for its popularity.
- 24.
In counterpoint to Lloyd, see Green (1995), which contests the claim that philosophical ideals of reason have excluded the feminine.
- 25.
See also the influential work of expatriate New Zealand philosopher Annette Baier, whose article ‘The Need for More than Justice’ (1987) was a key stimulus for these debates. In her widely cited article ‘Trust and Anti-Trust’ (1986), Baier comments that the great moral philosophers have, by and large, been single males who had minimal dealings with women. They were, she says, mostly ‘clerics, misogynists and puritan bachelors’ who focused ‘single-mindedly on cool, distanced relations between more or less free and equal adult strangers’ (1986, p. 248).
- 26.
Martha Nussbaum engaged in a memorable exchange with Peter Singer when she gave the 2003 Tanner Lectures in Human Values at the Australian National University. Nussbaum’s lectures subsequently formed the basis of her (2006) book.
- 27.
Also, Singer has inspired many of his graduate students to become leading bioethicists in their own right (such as Julian Savulescu and Udo Schuklenk), and he has shown himself very capable of helping his students to develop arguments which conflict with his own views.
- 28.
Michael Tooley subsequently worked for some time in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Western Australia, as did Mary Anne Warren, who made important contributions in applied ethics and feminist perspectives on ethics.
- 29.
Clarke and Oakley were awarded the 2004 Australian Catholic University Eureka Prize for Research in Ethics for this work.
- 30.
Levy’s 2007 book, Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century, won the 2009 Australian Catholic University Eureka Prize for Research in Ethics, and Levy is also the founding editor of the international refereed journal, Neuroethics, which began in 2008.
- 31.
This book won the 2011 Australian Catholic University Eureka Prize for Research in Ethics.
- 32.
- 33.
- 34.
See also Jackson and Pettit’s (1995) development of a moral analogue to functionalism in philosophy of mind, analysing terms such as good, right, and fair in terms of the role that they typically play in ‘folk morality’. This sort of approach to philosophical analysis more generally is an important part of what is sometimes referred to as the ‘Canberra Plan’. See also Hamilton (2008).
- 35.
In her well-known paper ‘Moral Saints’, Susan Wolf (1982) uses a different argument to support a similar view about morality.
References
Agar, N. (2004). Liberal eugenics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Agar, N. (2010). Humanity’s end: Why we should reject radical enhancement. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Allhoff, F., Lin, P., Moor, J., & Weckert, J. (Eds.). (2007). Nanoethics: The ethical and social implications of nanotechnology. Hoboken: John Wiley.
Baier, K. (1958). The moral point of view. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Baier, A. (1986). Trust and anti-trust. Ethics, 96, 231–260.
Baier, A. (1987). The need for more than justice. In M. Hanen & K. Nielsen (Eds.), Science, morality and feminist theory: Canadian journal of philosophy supplementary volume (pp. 41–56). Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
Ballantyne, A. (2008a). ‘Fair Benefits’ accounts of exploitation require a normative principle of fairness: Response to Gbadegesin and Wendler, and Emanuel et al. Bioethics, 22, 239–244.
Ballantyne, A. (2008b). Benefits to research subjects in international trials: Do they reduce exploitation or increase undue inducement? Developing World Bioethics, 8, 178–191.
Baltzly, D. (2003). Peripatetic perversions: A Neo-Aristotelian account of the nature of sexual perversion. The Monist, 86, 3–29.
Benn, S. (1975). Freedom, autonomy and the concept of a person. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 76, 109–130.
Benn, S. (1985). Wickedness. Ethics, 95, 795–810.
Benn, S. (1988). A theory of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biegler, P. (2011). The ethical treatment of depression: Autonomy through psychotherapy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Blackford, R. (2006a). Dr. Frankenstein meets Lord Devlin: Genetic engineering and the principle of intangible harm. The Monist, 89, 526–547.
Blackford, R. (2006b). Sinning against nature: The theory of background conditions. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32, 629–634.
Bowden, P. (1997). Caring: Gender-sensitive ethics. London: Routledge.
Broad, J. (forthcoming). Mary Astell and the virtues. In P. Weiss and A. Sowaal (Eds.), Feminist interpretations of Mary Astell. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Brock, G. (2009). Global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, R. (1987). Analyzing love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Browne, D. (1990). Ethics without morality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 68, 395–412.
Buckle, S. (1988). Arguing from potential. Bioethics, 2, 227–253.
Buckle, S. (1991). Natural Law and the theory of property: Grotius to Hume. Oxford: Clarendon.
Buckle, S. (2002). Aristotle’s republic, or why Aristotle’s ethics is not virtue ethics. Philosophy, 77, 565–595.
Campbell, A. (1989). A report from New Zealand: An ‘Unfortunate Experiment’. Bioethics, 3, 59–66.
Campbell, A. (1995). Ethics in a bicultural context. Bioethics, 9, 149–154.
Campbell, J. (1983). Kantian conceptions of moral goodness. Canadian Philosophical Quarterly, 13, 527–550.
Campbell, J. (1999). Can philosophical accounts of altruism survive experimental data on helping behaviour? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77, 26–45.
Campbell, K. (1986). A Stoic philosophy of life. Lanham: University Press of America.
Cannold, L. (1998). The abortion myth. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Charlesworth, M. (1989). Life, death, genes, and ethics. Sydney: ABC Books.
Charlesworth, M. (1992). Bioethics in a liberal society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, S., & Oakley, J. (2004). Informed consent and surgeons’ performance. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29, 11–35.
Clarke, S., & Oakley, J. (Eds.). (2007). Informed consent and clinician accountability: The ethics of report cards on surgeon performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coady, C. (1988). Deterrent intentions revisited. Ethics, 99, 98–108.
Coady, C. (1998). Australia, philosophy in. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (pp. 574–584). London: Routledge.
Coady, C. (2004). Terrorism, morality, and supreme emergency. Ethics, 114, 772–789.
Cocking, D., & Van Den Hoven, J. (forthcoming). Evil online. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cocking, D., & Kennett, J. (2000). Friendship and moral danger. Journal of Philosophy, 97, 278–296.
Cocking, D., & Oakley, J. (1995). Indirect consequentialism, friendship, and the problem of alienation. Ethics, 106, 86–111.
Cocking, D., & Oakley, J. (2010). Professional interpretation and judgment, and the integrity of lawyers. In T. Dare & W. Wendel (Eds.), Professional ethics and personal integrity (pp. 68–78). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Coghlan, P. (2005). The prodigal and his brother: Impartiality and the equal consideration of interests. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 26, 195–206.
Cohen, S. (1999). ‘Good Ethics is Good Business’—revisited. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 18, 57–68.
Coleman, S. (2004). The ethics of artificial uteruses: Implications for reproduction and abortion. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Colyvan, M., Cox, D., & Steele, K. (2010). Modeling the moral dimensions of decisions. Nous, 44, 503–529.
Cordner, C. (1994). Aristotelian virtue and its limitations. Philosophy, 69, 291–316.
Cox, D. (2006). Agent-based theories of right action. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 9, 505–515.
Cox, D., La Caze, M., & Levine, M. (2003). Integrity and the fragile self. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Crosthwaite, J. (2009). Gender and bioethics. In H. Kuhse & P. Singer (Eds.), A companion to bioethics (2nd ed., pp. 36–45). Oxford: Blackwell.
Crosthwaite, J., & Priest, G. (1996). The definition of sexual harassment. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74, 66–82.
Cullity, G. (1999). Virtue ethics, theory, and warrant. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2, 277–294.
Cullity, G. (2004a). The moral demands of affluence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cullity, G. (2004b). Sympathy, discernment, and reasons. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 64, 37–62.
D’Arcy, E. (1963). Human acts: an essay in their moral evaluation. Oxford: Clarendon.
Dare, T. (1998). Virtue ethics and legal ethics. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 28, 141–156.
Dare, T. (2009). The counsel of rogues? A defence of the standard conception of the lawyer’s role. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Darley, J., & Batson, D. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 100–108.
Das, R. (2003). Virtue ethics and right action. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 81, 324–339.
Dodds, S. (2010). Feminist bioethics. In G. Oppy & N. Trakakis (Eds.), A companion to philosophy in Australia and New Zealand (pp. 181–184). Melbourne: Monash University Publishing.
Dodds, S., & Jones, K. (1989). Surrogacy and autonomy. Bioethics, 3, 1–17.
Douglas, C., Kerridge, I., & Ankeny, R. (2008). Managing intentions: The end-of-life administration of analgesics and sedatives, and the possibility of slow euthanasia. Bioethics, 22, 388–396.
Driver, J. (2007). Ethics: The fundamentals. Malden: Blackwell.
Dunn, R. (1987). The possibility of weakness of will. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Elliott, R. (1996). Facts about natural values. Environmental Values, 5, 221–234.
Ewin, R.E. (1981). Co-operation and human values: A study of moral reasoning. Brighton: Harvester Press.
Ewin, R. (1991). Virtues and rights: The moral philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Boulder: Westview Press.
Ewin, R. (1992). Loyalty and virtues. The Philosophical Quarterly, 42, 403–419.
Ford, N. (1988). When did I begin? Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Franklin, J. (2003). Corrupting the youth: A history of philosophy in Australia. Sydney: Macleay Press.
Gaita, R. (1999). A common humanity: Thinking about love and truth and justice. Melbourne: Text.
Gaita, R. (1991/2004). Good and evil: An absolute conception. London: Routledge.
Gardiner, S. (Ed.). (2005). Virtue ethics: Old and new. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Gatens, M. (1996). Imaginary bodies: Ethics, power and corporeality. London: Routledge.
Gaus, G. (1989). Practical reason and moral persons. Ethics, 100, 127–148.
Gillam, L., & Sullivan, J. (2011). Ethics at the end of life: Who should make decisions about treatment limitation for young children with life-threatening or life-limiting conditions? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 47, 594–598.
Gillam, L., Guilleman, M., Bolitho, A., & Rosenthal, D. (2009). Human research ethics in practice: Deliberative strategies, processes and perceptions. Monash Bioethics Review, 28, 07.1–07.17.
Gillett, G. (1987). AIDS and confidentiality. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 4, 15–20.
Gillett, G. (1990). Consciousness, the brain, and what matters. Bioethics, 4, 181–198.
Gillett, G. (1994). Killing, letting die, and moral perception. Bioethics, 8, 312–328.
Gillett, G. (1999). The mind and its discontents: An essay in discursive psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press.
Godwin, W. (1968). Thoughts occasioned by the perusal of Dr Parr’s Spital Sermon. In J. Marken & B. Pollin (Eds.), Uncollected writings (1785–1822) by William Godwin (pp. 281–374). Gainesville: Scholars Facsimiles and Reprints.
Goodin, R. (1989). No smoking: The ethical issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goodin, R. (1995). Utilitarianism as a public philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grace, D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Business ethics: Problems and cases (3rd ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Grave, S. (1984). A history of philosophy in Australia. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
Green, K. (1995). The woman of reason: Feminism, humanism, and political thought. London: Polity Press.
Green, K. (2012). Virtue ethics and the origins of feminism. The case of Christine de Pizan. In E. O’Neill & M. Lascano (Eds.), Feminist history of philosophy: The recovery and evaluation of women’s philosophical thought. Dordrecht: Springer.
Green, K., & Mews, C. (Eds.). (2011). Virtue ethics for women 1250–1500. Dordrecht: Springer.
Haakonssen, K. (1996). Natural law and moral philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton, R. (2008). The Darwinian Cage: Evolutionary psychology as moral science. Theory, Culture and Society, 25, 105–125.
Hare, R. (1963). Freedom and reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hare, R. (1981). Moral thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hare, R. (1993). Moral problems about the control of behavior. In R. Hare (Ed.), Essays on bioethics (pp. 50–66). Oxford: Clarendon.
Holton, R. (1999). Intention and weakness of will. Journal of Philosophy, 96, 241–262.
Hursthouse, R. (1987). Beginning lives. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hursthouse, R. (1991). Virtue theory and abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 20, 223–246.
Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, F. (1991). Decision-theoretic consequentialism and the nearest and dearest objection. Ethics, 101, 461–482.
Jackson, F., & Pettit, P. (1995). Moral functionalism and moral motivation. The Philosophical Quarterly, 45, 20–40.
Jackson, F., & Smith, M. (2006). Absolutist moral theories and uncertainty. Journal of Philosophy, 103, 267–283.
Jamieson, D. (Ed.). (1999). Singer and his critics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Johnson, R. (2003). Virtue and right. Ethics, 113, 810–834.
Johnstone, M.-J. (2009). Bioethics: A nursing perspective. Sydney: Churchill-Livingstone.
Jones, D. (1991). Fetal neural transplantation: Placing the ethical debate within the context of society’s use of human material. Bioethics, 5, 23–43.
Jones, D., & Whitaker, M. (2009). Speaking for the dead: The human body in biology and medicine. Farnham: Ashgate.
Jones, K. (2003). Emotion, weakness of will, and the normative conception of agency. In A. Hatzimoysis (Ed.), Philosophy and the emotions (pp. 181–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, K. (2004). Trust and terror. In M. Walker & P. DesAutels (Eds.), Minds, hearts, and morality: Feminist essays in moral psychology (pp. 3–18). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Jost, L., & Wuerth, J. (Eds.). (2011). Perfecting virtue: New essays on Kantian ethics and virtue ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Joyce, R. (2001). The myth of morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keller, S. (2007a). The limits of loyalty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keller, S. (2007b). Virtue ethics is self-effacing. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 85, 221–231.
Kennett, J. (1993). Mixed motives. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 71, 256–269.
Kennett, J. (2001). Agency and responsibility: A commonsense moral psychology. Oxford: Clarendon.
Kennett, J., & Fine, C. (2004). Mental impairment, moral understanding and mitigation: Psychopathy and the purposes of punishment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27, 425–443.
Kilcullen, J. (1983). Utilitarianism and virtue. Ethics, 93, 451–466.
Komesaroff, P. (2002). Response to Susan Dodds: Is the Australian HREC system sustainable? Monash Bioethics Review, 21, S68–S71.
Kovesi, J. (1967). Moral notions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kuhse, H. (1987). The sanctity-of-life doctrine in medicine: A critique. Oxford: Clarendon.
Kuhse, H. (Ed.). (1994). Willing to listen—wanting to die. Melbourne: Penguin.
Kuhse, H. (1997). Caring: Nurses, women and ethics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Kuhse, H., & Singer, P. (Eds.). (1985). Should the baby live? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kuhse, H., & Singer, P. (Eds). (1998/2009). A companion to bioethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kuhse, H. and Singer, P. (Eds) (1999/2006). Bioethics: An anthology. Oxford: Blackwell.
La Caze, M. (2005). Love, that indispensable supplement: Irigaray and Kant on love and respect. Hypatia, 20, 92–114.
La Caze, M. (2010). Feminist philosophy. In G. Oppy & N. Trakakis (Eds.), A companion to philosophy in Australia and New Zealand (pp. 184–188). Melbourne: Monash University Publishing.
Lamb, R. (Ed.). (1997). Love analysed. Colorado: Westview Press.
Lamont, J. (1997). Incentive income, deserved income and economic rents. Journal of Political Philosophy, 5, 26–46.
Lange M., Rogers W., & Dodds S. (2013). Vulnerability in research ethics: A way forward. Bioethics, 27, 333–340.
Langton, R. (1992). Duty and desolation. Philosophy, 67, 481–505.
Langton, R. (1993). Speech acts and unspeakable acts. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22, 293–330.
Levy, N. (2002a). Moral relativism: A short introduction. London: Oneworld.
Levy, N. (2002b). Reconsidering cochlear implants: The lessons of Martha’s Vineyard. Bioethics, 16, 134–153.
Levy, N. (2007). Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levy, N., & Lotz, M. (2005). Reproductive cloning and a (kind of) genetic fallacy. Bioethics, 19, 232–250.
Lipworth, W., Carter, S., & Kerridge, I. (2008). The ‘EBM movement’: Where did it come from, where is it going and why does it matter? Social Epistemology, 22, 425–431.
Lloyd, G. (1984). The man of reason: ‘Male’ and ‘female’ in western philosophy. London: Methuen.
Loff, B., & Black, J. (2000). The declaration of Helsinki and research in vulnerable populations. Medical Journal of Australia, 172, 292–295.
Lotz, M. (2009). Procreative reasons-relevance: On the moral significance of why we have children. Bioethics, 23, 291–299.
Mackenzie, C. (1992). Abortion and embodiment. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 70, 55–136.
Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (Eds.). (2000). Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mackie, J. (1946). A refutation of morals. Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy, 24, 77–90.
Mackie, J. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. London: Penguin.
Malpas, J., & Solomon, R. (Eds.). (1998). Death and philosophy. London: Routledge.
Manning, J. (Ed.). (2009). The Cartwright papers: Essays on the cervical cancer inquiry of 1987–88. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.
Marshall, G. (1980). Overdetermination and the emotions. In A. Rorty (Ed.), Explaining emotions (pp. 197–222). Berkeley: University of California Press.
McCloskey, H. (1957). An examination of restricted utilitarianism. Philosophical Review, 66, 466–85.
McCloskey, H. (1965). A non-utilitarian approach to punishment. Inquiry, 8, 249–263.
McCloskey, H. (1971). John Stuart Mill: A critical study. London: Macmillan.
McDougall, R. (2005). Acting parentally: An argument against sex selection. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 601–605.
McDougall, R. (2007). Parental virtue: A new way of thinking about the morality of reproductive actions. Bioethics, 21, 181–190.
McKie, J., Richardson, J., Singer, P., & Kuhse, H. (1998). The allocation of health care resources: An ethical evaluation of the ‘QALY’ approach. Aldershot: Ashgate.
McNeill, P. (1993). The ethics and politics of human experimentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Medlin, B. (1957). Ultimate principles and ethical egoism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 35, 111–118.
Mill, J. (1962). Utilitarianism. Cleveland: Meridian Books.
Miller, S., Blackler, J., & Alexandra, A. (2006). Police ethics (2nd ed.). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Mills, C. (2011). Futures of reproduction: Bioethics and biopolitics. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mintoff, J. (1997). Rational cooperation, intention, and reconsideration. Ethics, 107, 612–643.
Monro, D. (1967). Empiricism and ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, A. (2007). Ethical theory, completeness, and consistency. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10, 297–308.
Mulgan, T. (2001). The demands of consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mulgan, T. (2007). Understanding utilitarianism. Stocksfield: Acumen.
Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Oakley, J. (1992). Morality and the emotions. London: Routledge.
Oakley, J. (1996). Varieties of virtue ethics. Ratio, 9, 128–152.
Oakley, J. (2003). Medical ethics, history of: Australia and New Zealand. In S. Post (Ed.), Encyclopedia of bioethics (3rd ed., pp. 5–1553). New York: Macmillan. vol. 3.
Oakley, J. (2011). Justice, post-retirement shame, and the failure of the standard conception of lawyers’ roles. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 36, 177–184.
Oakley, J., & Cocking, D. (2001). Virtue ethics and professional roles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oddie, G., & Menzies, P. (1992). An objectivist’s guide to subjective value. Ethics, 102, 512–533.
Oderberg, D. (2010). Deontology. In G. Oppy & N. Trakakis (Eds.), A companion to philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing. http://books.publishing.monash.edu/apps/bookworm/view/A+Companion+to+Philosophy+in+Australia+and+New+Zealand/56/xhtml/chapter04.html#chapter04sec02.
Oderberg, D., & Laing, J. (Eds.). (1997). Human lives: Critical essays on non-consequentialist bioethics. London: Macmillan.
Oppy, G., Trakakis, N., Burns, L., Gardner, S., & Leigh, F. (Eds.). (2010). A companion to philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing.
Otago University. (n. d.). Philosophical history: The Otago Department. Otago Philosophy. http://www.otago.ac.nz/philosophy/history.html
Perrett, R. (1987). Death and immortality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Perrett, R., & Patterson, J. (1991). Virtue ethics and maori ethics. Philosophy East and West, 41, 185–202.
Pettit, P. (1991). Consequentialism. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 230–237). Oxford: Blackwell.
Pettit, P. (1997). The consequentialist perspective. In M. Baron, P. Pettit, & M. Slote (Eds.), Three methods of ethics: A debate. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pettit, P., & Brennan, G. (1986). Restrictive consequentialism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64, 438–455.
Pigden, C. (1990). Geach on ‘Good’. The Philosophical Quarterly, 40, 129–154.
Pigden, C. (Ed.). (2009). Hume on motivation and virtue. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Plumwood, V. (1991). Nature, self, and gender: Feminism, environmental philosophy, and the critique of rationalism. Hypatia, 6, 3–27.
Pogge, T. (2005). Human rights and global health: A research program. Metaphilosophy, 36, 182–209.
Primoratz, I. (2002). Michael Walzer’s Just War theory: Some issues of responsibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 5, 221–243.
Railton, P. (1984). Alienation, consequentialism, and the demands of morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 13, 134–171.
Ramsay, H. (1997). Beyond virtue: Integrity and morality. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Reader, S., & Brock, G. (2004). Needs, moral demands and moral theory. Utilitas, 16, 251–266.
Rogers, W., & Ballantyne, A. (2008). When is sex-specific research appropriate? International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 1, 36–57.
Rowland, R. (1992). Living laboratories: Women and reproductive technologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Russell, L. (2007). Is evil action qualitatively distinct from ordinary wrongdoing? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 85, 659–677.
Russell, D. (2009). Practical intelligence and the virtues. New York: Oxford University Press.
Savulescu, J. (2001). Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics, 15, 413–426.
Savulescu, J. (2006). Sex selection: The case for. In H. Kuhse & P. Singer (Eds.), Bioethics: An anthology (2nd ed., pp. 145–149). Malden: Blackwell.
Savulescu, J., & Bostrom, N. (Eds.). (2009). Human enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scarlett, B. (1992). Moral philosophy 1945–1980. In J. Srzednicki & W. David (Eds.), Essays on philosophy in Australia (pp. 51–77). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Schroeter, F. (2006). The limits of sentimentalism. Ethics, 116, 337–361.
Schüklenk, U. (1998). Access to experimental drugs in terminal illness: Ethical issues. New York: Pharmaceutical Products Press.
Selgelid, M. (2007). Ethics and drug resistance. Bioethics, 21, 218–229.
Selgelid, M., & Miller, S. (2008). Ethical and philosophical consideration of the dual-use dilemma in the biological sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.
Selgelid, M., Battin, M., & Smith, C. (Eds.). (2006). Ethics and infectious disease. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sherman, N. (1997). Making a necessity of virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sidgwick, H. (1981). The methods of ethics (7th ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Singer, P. (1972). Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 229–43.
Singer, P. (1973). The triviality of the debate over ‘Is-Ought’ and the definition of ‘Moral’. American Philosophical Quarterly, 10, 51–56.
Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation. New York: Random House.
Singer, P. (1979/1993/2011). Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Singer, P. (Ed.). (1986). Applied ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Singer, P. (1991). A companion to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Singer, P. (1994a). Rethinking life and death. Melbourne: Text.
Singer, P. (Ed.). (1994b). Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Singer, P. (2009). The life you can save: Acting now to end world poverty. Melbourne: Text.
Singer, P., & Kuhse, H. (2006). 1980–2005: Bioethics then and now. Monash Bioethics Review, 25, 9–14.
Singer, P., & Wells, D. (1984). The reproduction revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Singer, P., Kuhse, H., Buckle, S., Dawson, K., & Kasimba, P. (Eds.). (1990). Embryo experimentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slote, M. (1992). From morality to virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slote, M. (2001). Morals from motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smart, J. J. C. (1956). Extreme and restricted utilitarianism. Philosophical Quarterly, 6, 344–354.
Smart, J. J. C. (1961). An outline of a system of utilitarian ethics. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press (on behalf of the University of Adelaide).
Smart, J. J. C. (1973). An outline of a system of utilitarian ethics. In J. J. C. Smart & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, M. (1994). The moral problem. Oxford: Blackwell.
Smith, M. (2005). Meta-ethics. In F. Jackson & M. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contemporary philosophy (pp. 3–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, M. (2009). Two kinds of consequentialism. Philosophical Issues, 19, 257–272.
Sparrow, R. (2005). Defending deaf culture: The case of cochlear implants. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 13, 135–152.
Sparrow, R. (2006). Cloning, parenthood, and genetic relatedness. Bioethics, 20, 308–318.
Sparrow, R. (2009). Building a better warbot: Ethical issues in the design of unmanned systems for military applications. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, 169–187.
Sparrow, R. (2010). Better than men? Sex and the therapy/enhancement distinction. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 20, 115–144.
Sparrow, R. (2011). A not-so-new eugenics: Harris and Savulescu on human enhancement. The Hastings Center Report, 41, 32–42.
Spriggs, M. (2005). Autonomy and patients’ decisions. Maryland: Lexington Books.
Spriggs, M. (2009). Consent in cyberspace: Internet-based research involving young people. Monash Bioethics Review, 28, 32.1–15.
Stocker, M. (1976). The schizophrenia of modern ethical theories. Journal of Philosophy, 73, 453–466.
Stocker, M. (1979). Desiring the bad: An essay in moral psychology. Journal of Philosophy, 76, 738–753.
Stocker, M. (1980). Intellectual desire, emotion, and action. In A. Rorty (Ed.), Explaining emotions (pp. 323–338). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Stocker, M. (1983a). Affectivity and self-concern: The assumed psychology in Aristotle’s ethics. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, 211–229.
Stocker, M. (1983b). Psychic feelings: Their importance and irreducibility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61, 5–26.
Stocker, M. (1987). Emotional thoughts. American Philosophical Quarterly, 24, 59–69.
Stocker, M. (1990). Plural and conflicting values. Oxford: Clarendon.
Stocker, M. (1996). Valuing emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press (with Hegeman, E.).
Stoljar, N. (2011). Informed consent and relational conceptions of autonomy. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 36, 375–384.
Swanton, C. (2003). Virtue ethics, a pluralistic view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, C. (2002). Sympathy: A philosophical analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Taylor, C. (2011). Moralism: A study of a vice. Durham: Acumen.
Ten, C. (1980). Mill on liberty. Oxford: Clarendon.
Thompson, J. (1998). Discourse and knowledge: Defence of a collectivist ethics. London: Routledge.
Thompson, J. (2009). Intergenerational justice: Rights and responsibilities in an intergenerational polity. London: Routledge.
Tobin, B. (1989). An Aristotelian theory of moral development. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 23, 195–211.
Tobin, B. (2000). The virtues in John Wilson’s approach to moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 29, 301–311.
Tobin, B. (2005). Australian consequentialism: An Australian critique. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 26, 165–173.
Tong, R., Donchin, A., & Dodds, S. (Eds.). (2004). Linking visions feminist bioethics, human rights and the developing world. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Tooley, M. (1972). Abortion and infanticide. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2, 37–65.
Uniacke, S. (1984). The doctrine of double effect. The Thomist, 48, 188–218.
Uniacke, S. (1994). Permissible killing: The self-defence justification of homicide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Uniacke, S., & McCloskey, H. (1992). Peter Singer and non-voluntary ‘Euthanasia’: Tripping down the slippery slope. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 9, 203–219.
van den Hoven, J., & Weckert, J. (Eds.). (2008). Information technology and moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Hooft, S. (2006). Understanding virtue ethics. Chesham: Acumen.
Van Hooft, S. (2011). Caring, objectivity and justice: An integrative view. Nursing Ethics, 18, 149–160.
van Hooft, S. (Eds) (2013). The handbook of virtue ethics. Durham: Acumen.
van Zyl, L. (2000). Death and compassion: A virtue-based approach to euthanasia. Aldershot: Ashgate.
van Zyl, L. (2009). Agent-based virtue ethics and the problem of action guidance. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 6, 50–69.
van Zyl, L. (2011). Right action and the non-virtuous agent. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 28, 80–92.
Walsh, A., & Lynch, T. (2003). The development of price formation theory and subjectivism about ultimate values. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 20, 263–278.
Walters, W., & Singer, P. (Eds.). (1982). Test-tube babies: A guide to moral questions, present techniques and future possibilities. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Wilkinson, D. (2009). The window of opportunity: Decision theory and the timing of prognostic tests for newborn infants. Bioethics, 23, 503–514.
Wilkinson, M. (2007). Individual and family decisions about organ donation. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24, 26–40.
Wilkinson, M., & Moore, A. (1997). Inducement in research. Bioethics, 11, 89–373.
Wolf, S. (1982). Moral saints. Journal of Philosophy, 79, 419–439.
Wolfendale, J. (2007). Torture and the military profession. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Young, R. (1986). Personal autonomy: Beyond negative and positive liberty. London: Croom Helm.
Young, R. (2007). Medically-assisted death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zion, D. (1998). ‘Moral Taint’ or ethical responsibility? Unethical information and the problem of HIV clinical trials in developing countries. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 15, 231–239.
Zion, D., Briskman, L., & Loff, B. (2010). Returning to history: The ethics of researching asylum seeker health in Australia. The American Journal of Bioethics, 10, 48–56.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Nick Trakakis and Graham Oppy for their advice, and to Keith Campbell, Roger Crisp, Satoshi Kodama, and Barry and Carmel Oakley for their comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Oakley, J. (2014). Moral Philosophy in Australasia. In: Oppy, G., Trakakis, N. (eds) History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6958-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6958-8_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6957-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6958-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law