Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Mortimer Sellers, Stephan Kirste

Legal Knowledge: The Hermeneutical Point of View

  • Baldassare PastoreEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_363-1

Introduction

One of the most recurrent discussions in legal-theoretical debates is that concerning the knowledge of law. What do we know when we know the law? What kind of knowledge is legal knowledge?

Legal knowledge denotes an activity, aiming at the representation, reconstruction, systematization, conceptualization, and explanation of phenomena regarding legal experience. This activity can proceed at more than one level. Law can be studied from different disciplines and perspectives. The term “legal knowledge” is used in various senses. It can assume different forms (Viola and Zaccaria 1999: 409–435; Peczenik 2005: 1–2, 8–10; Núñez Vaquero 2013: 53–81).

Among the phenomena which are commonly supposed to constitute a part of legal experience, “there are rules of many kinds, actions performed by judges, officials, lawyers and citizens, certain legal institutions, certain kinds of discourses including arguments produced by judges in resolving legal controversies, speeches and accounts...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bin R (2012) Order and disorder. Legal adjudication and quantum epistemology, vol 2. NYU School of Law Straus Institute Working Paper. pp 1–74Google Scholar
  2. Crease RP (1997) Hermeneutics and the natural sciences: introduction. Man World 30:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dworkin R (1986) Law’s empire. Fontana Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Finnis J (1980) Natural law and natural rights. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Gadamer HG (1986) Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. In: Gesammelte Werke (vol I). Mohr, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  6. Mootz IIIFJ (2010) Law, hermeneutics and rhetoric. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  7. Núñez Vaquero Á (2013) Five models of legal science. Revus 19:53–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pastore B (2014) Interpreti e fonti nell’esperienza giuridica contemporanea. Cedam, PadovaGoogle Scholar
  9. Peczenik A (2005) Scientia juris. Legal doctrine as knowledge of law and as a source of law. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  10. Ricoeur P (1986) Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique, II. Éditions du Seuil, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith C (2011) The vicissitudes of the hermeneutic paradigm in the study of law: tradition, forms of life and metaphor. Erasmus Law Rev 4:21–38Google Scholar
  12. Tuori K (2011) Ratio and voluntas. The tension between reason and will in law. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  13. Tuzet G (2016) Is legal knowledge practical? Bocconi Legal Studies Research Paper. Available at SSRN:  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2887363
  14. Villa V (1984) Legal science between natural and human sciences. Leg Stud 4:243–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Villa V (1997) Legal theory and value judgments. Law Philos 16:447–477Google Scholar
  16. Viola F, Zaccaria G (1999) Diritto e interpretazione. Lineamenti di teoria ermeneutica del diritto. Laterza, Roma-BariGoogle Scholar
  17. White JB (2002) Legal knowledge. Harv Law Rev 115:1396–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di GiurisprudenzaUniversità degli Studi di FerraraFerraraItaly

Section editors and affiliations

  • Pierluigi Chiassoni
    • 1
  1. 1.LawUniversità degli Studi di GenovaGenovaItaly