Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Mortimer Sellers, Stephan Kirste


  • Frederik von HarbouEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_148-1


Questions regarding immigration are among the most controversial topics of social and legal philosophy, as well as of ethics, political theory, and politics itself. The tensions can be framed as the conflict between positions of moral universalism (or cosmopolitan individualism) and particularism (often a form of communitarianism). However, in jurisprudence, it is mostly treated as an antagonism between a human rights-based and a sovereignty-based approach to international law.

Despite their significance today, few philosophers have discussed questions of immigration ethics before the twentieth century. Among the most prominent exceptions are Immanuel Kant, Emer de Vattel, and Henry Sidgwick.

According to Kant, in a brief section of his 1795 essay Perpetual Peace (Zum Ewigen Frieden), what follows from the original common possession of the surface of the earth is only the cosmopolitan right to hospitality, which is supposed to be a right of temporary sojourn (Besuchsrecht)...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Abizadeh A (2008) Democratic theory and border coercion: no right to unilaterally control your own borders. Polit Theory 36:37–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agamben G (2000) Beyond human rights. In: Agamben G (ed) Means without end. Notes on Politics University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota, pp 15–25Google Scholar
  3. Arendt H (1968) The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt, Brace & World, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bader V (2005) The ethics of immigration. Constellations 12(3):331–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benhabib S (2004) The rights of others. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carens J (1987) Aliens and citizens: the case for open borders. Rev Polit 49(2):251–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole P (2000) Philosophies of exclusion. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  8. de Vattel E (1883) The law of nations. Johnson & Co, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  9. Derrida J (2000) Hospitality. Angelaki 5(3):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finnis J (2011) Migration rights. In: Finnis J (ed) Human rights and common good. Collected essays, vol III. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kant I (1901) Perpetual peace. A philosophical essay. George Allan & Unwin Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Miller D (2014) Immigration: the case for limits. In: Cohen A, Wellman C (eds) Contemporary debates in applied ethics, 2nd edn. Wiley, Malden, pp 363–375Google Scholar
  13. Oberman K (2015) Poverty and immigration policy. Am Polit Sci Assoc 109(2):239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pogge T (1997) Migration and poverty. In: Bader V (ed) Citizenship and exclusion. Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  15. Rawls J (1999) The law of peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  16. Raz J (2001) Value, respect, and attachment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scheffler S (2007) Immigration and the significance of culture. Philos Public Aff 35(2):93–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sidgwick H (1908) The elements of politics, 3rd edn. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Walzer M (1983) Spheres of justice. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Wellman CH (2008) Immigration and freedom of association. Ethics 119(1):109–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Justus Liebig University GiessenGiessenGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • Tetsu Sakurai
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Intercultural StudiesKobe UniversityKobeJapan