Advertisement

Virtues and Vices in Workplace Settings: The Role of Moral Character in Predicting Counterproductive and Citizenship Behaviors

  • Lily Morse
  • Taya R. Cohen
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Which moral character traits are influential in predicting moral and immoral workplace behaviors? We focus our investigation on two workplace behaviors relevant to morality, organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB) and counterproductive work behaviors (CWB), and review research on key personality traits associated with these behaviors. We discuss broad traits described by the Big Five personality framework and the HEXACO model of personality, as well as narrower traits that predict moral and immoral behaviors, including guilt proneness, self-control, and moral identity. The research we describe challenges situationist perspectives in business ethics and psychology that claim that character traits do not significantly and consistently predict behavior across situations. In contrast to situationist perspectives, we argue that moral character exists and predicts consequential work outcomes.

Keywords

Personality Psychology Moral character Organizational citizenship behavior Counterproductive work behavior 

References

  1. Allport GW (1937) Personality: a psychological interpretation. Henry Holt & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Alzola M (2008) Character and environment: the status of virtues in organizations. J Bus Ethics 78:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alzola M (2012) The possibility of virtue. Bus Ethics Q 22(2):377–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aquino K, Reed A II (2002) The self-importance of moral identity. J Pers Soc Psychol 83(6):1423–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashton MC, Lee K (2007) Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 11(2):150–166. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry CM, Ones DS, Sackett PR (2007) Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: a review and meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 92(2):410–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borman WC, Penner LA, Allen TD, Motowidlo SJ (2001) Personality predictors of citizenship performance. Int J Sel Assess 9:52–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdage JS, Lee K, Lee J-H, Shin K-H (2012) Motives for organizational citizenship behavior: personality correlates and coworker ratings of OCB. Hum Perform 25(3):179–200. doi:10.1080/08959285.2012.683904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen PY, Spector PE (1992) Relationships of work stressors with aggression, withdrawal, theft and substance use: an exploratory study. J Occup Organ Psychol 65:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen TR, Wolf ST, Panter AT, Insko CA (2011) Introducing the GASP scale: a new measure of guilt and shame proneness. J Pers Soc Psychol 100(5):947–966. doi:10.1037/a0022641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen TR, Panter AT, Turan N (2012) Guilt proneness and moral character. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 21(5):355–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen TR, Panter AT, Turan N, Morse L, Kim Y (2013a) Agreement and similarity in self-other perceptions of moral character. J Res Pers 47:816–830. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen TR, Panter AT, Turan N (2013b) Predicting counterproductive work behavior from guilt proneness. J Bus Ethics 114:45–53. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1326-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen TR, Panter AT, Turan N, Morse L, Kim Y (2014) Moral character in the workplace. J Pers Soc Psychol 107(5):943–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cullen MJ, Sackett PR (2003) Personality and counterproductive behavior workplace behavior. In: Barrick M, Ryan AM (eds) Personality and work. Jossey Bass-Pfeiffer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalal RS (2005) A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. J Appl Psychol 90(6):1241–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis-Blake A, Pfeffer J (1989) Just a mirage: the search for dispositional effects in organizational research. Acad Manage Rev 14(3):385–400. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4279071Google Scholar
  18. Doris JM (2002) Lack of character: personality and moral behavior. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fleeson W, Furr RM, Jayawickreme E, Meindl P, Helzer EG (2014) Character: the prospects for a personality-based perspective on morality. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 8(4):178–191. doi:10.1111/spc3.12094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fox S, Spector PE, Miles D (2001) Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. J Vocat Behav 59:291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox S, Spector PE, Goh A, Bruursema K, Kessler SR (2012) The deviant citizen: measuring potential positive relations between counterproductive work behaviour and organizational citizenship behaviour. J Occup Organ Psychol 85(1):199–220. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02032.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freud S (1961) The ego and the id [original work published 1923–1925] (trans: Strachey J). In: Strachey J (ed) The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vol 19. Hogarth Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Funder DC, Fast LA (2010) Personality in social psychology. In: Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G (eds) Handbook of social psychology, vol 5. Wiley, New York, pp 668–697Google Scholar
  24. Funder DC, Ozer DJ (1983) Behavior as a function of the situation. J Pers Soc Psychol 44(1):107–112. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Gruys ML, Sackett PR (2003) The dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. Int J Sel Assess 11:30–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haidt J, Kesebir S (2010) Morality. In: Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G (eds) Handbook of social psychology, vol 5. Wiley, New York, pp 797–832Google Scholar
  28. Harman G (2009) Skepticism about character traits. J Ethics 13(2–3):235–242. doi:10.1007/s10892-009-9050-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hogan R (1973) Moral conduct and moral character: a psychological perspective. Psychol Bull 79(4):217–232. doi:10.1037/h0033956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hough LM (1992) The “big five” personality variables – construct confusion: description versus prediction. Hum Perform 5:139–155Google Scholar
  31. Janoff-Bulman R, Carnes NC (2013) Surveying the moral landscape moral motives and group-based moralities. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. doi:10.1177/1088868313480274Google Scholar
  32. Kumar K, Bakhshi A, Rani E (2009) Linking the “big five” personality domains to organizational citizenship behavior. Int J Psychol Stud 1(2):73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee K, Ashton MC (2012) The H factor of personality: why some people are manipulative, self-entitled, materialistic, and exploitive – and why It matters for everyone. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, WaterlooGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee K, Ashton MC, de Vries RE (2005) Predicting workplace delinquency and integrity with the HEXACO and Five-Factor models of personality structure. Hum Perform 18:179–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marcus B, Schuler H (2004) Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: a general perspective. J Appl Psychol 89:647–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marcus B, Lee K, Ashton MC (2007) Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior: big five, or one in addition? Pers Psychol 60(1):1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marcus B, Ashton MC, Lee K (2013) A note on the incremental validity of integrity tests beyond standard personality inventories for the criterion of counterproductive behaviour. Can J Adm Sci 30:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCrae RR, Costa PT (1987) Validation of the 5-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J Pers Soc Psychol 52:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller CB (2013) Moral character: an empirical theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mischel W (1968) Personality and assessment. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Moon H, Hollenbeck JR, Marinova S, Humphrey SE (2008) Beneath the surface: uncovering the relationship between extraversion and organizational citizenship behavior through a facet approach. Int J Sel Assess 16(2):143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mount M, Ilies R, Johnson E (2006) Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: the mediating effects of job satisfaction. Pers Psychol 59:591–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neuman GA, Kickul JR (1998) Organizational citizenship behaviors: achievement orientation and personality. J Bus Psychol 13(2):263–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Neill TA, Lewis RJ, Carswell JJ (2011) Employee personality, justice perceptions, and the prediction of workplace deviance. Personal Individ Differ 51(5):595–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oh I-S, Lee K, Ashton MC, Reinout RE (2011) Are dishonest extraverts more harmful than dishonest introverts? The interaction effects of honesty-humility and extraversion in predicting workplace deviance. Appl Psychol Int Rev 60:496–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ones DS, Viswesvaran C, Schmidt FL (2003) Personality and absenteeism: a meta- analysis of integrity tests. Eur J Personal 17:39–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Organ DW (1988) Organizational citizenship behavior: the good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  48. Organ DW, Ryan K (1995) A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Pers Psychol 48:775–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Organ DW, Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB (2006) Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  50. Ozer DJ, Benet-Martínez V (2006) Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annu Rev Psychol 57(1):401–421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peterson C, Seligman MEP (2004) Character strengths and virtues: a handbook and classification. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Rai TS, Fiske AP (2011) Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychol Rev 118(1):57–75. doi:10.1037/a0021867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reed A, Aquino K (2003) Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. J Pers Soc Psychol 84(6):1270–1286. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roberts BW, Kuncel NR, Shiner R, Caspi A, Goldberg LR (2007) The power of personality: the comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspect Psychol Sci 2:313–345. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ross L, Nisbett RE (1991) The person and the situation: perspectives of social psychology. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Sackett PR, DeVore CJ (2001) Counterproductive behaviors at work. In: Anderson N, Ones D, Sinangil C, Viswesvaran C (eds) International handbook of work psychology. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 145–164Google Scholar
  57. Salgado JF (2002) The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. Int J Sel Assess 10:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Spector PE, Fox S (2005) The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In: Fox S, Spector PE (eds) Counterproductive work behavior: investigations of actors and targets. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 151–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spector PE, Fox S, Penney L, Bruursema K, Goh A, Kessler S (2006) The dimensionality of counterproductivity: are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? J Vocat Behav 68(3):446–460. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL (2004) High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers 72(2):271–324. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tangney JP, Stuewig J, Mashek D, Hastings M (2011) Assessing jail inmates’ proneness to shame and guilt: feeling bad about the behavior or the self? Crim Just Behav 38(7):710–734. doi:10.1177/0093854811405762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zimbardo P (2004) A situationist perspective on the psychology of evil: understanding how good people are transformed into perpetrators. In: Miller A (ed) The social psychology of good and evil: understanding our capacity for kindness and cruelty. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Tepper School of BusinessCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations