Abstract
Understanding the behaviors by which animals deploy their venoms has been largely neglected compared to other aspects of the evolution and biology of venomous organisms and their venoms. Yet, behavior has long been recognized as a pacemaker for the evolution of morphological, ecological, life history, and other traits, in large part because behavioral responses can expose organisms to or protect them from novel selection pressures. The importance of behavior is especially evident in that venom most often functions through a behavioral act that generates a wound in a target animal through which the toxic secretion must be introduced. As a limited and costly commodity, venom should be deployed strategically and judiciously by those animals that possess it. The chapter summarizes the major aspects of adaptive venom use in animals, and highlights the best documented examples of strategic venom deployment among spiders. These animals, like other venomous taxa, exhibit four major behavioral strategies. First, they are often highly selective when using their venom, discharging it only under certain conditions. Second, they can modulate the quantity of venom they expend in both predatory and defensive contexts, delivering multiple bites or variable quantities within individual doses. Third, at least one study suggests that spiders possess venom gland heterogeneity and therefore deliver varying venom composition with successive venom expulsions. Finally, some evidence suggests that spiders can strategically target the delivery of their weapon at a particularly vulnerable region of their target. Collectively, the evidence suggests a common theme among spiders and other venomous animals for economization and optimization of venom deployment.
References
Beaman KR, Hayes WK. Rattlesnakes: research trends and annotated checklist. In: Hayes WK, Beaman KR, Cardwell MD, Bush SP, editors. The biology of rattlesnakes. Loma Linda: Loma Linda University Press; 2008.
Boeve JL. Injection of venom into an insect prey by the free hunting spider Cupiennius salei (Araneae, Ctenidae). J Zool. 1994;234:165–75.
Boeve JL, Meier C. Spider venom and ecoethological implications – a simple mathematical model. Ecol Model. 1994;73(1–2):149–57.
Boeve JL, Kuhn-Nentwig L, Keller S, Nentwig W. Quantity and quality of venom released by a spider (Cupiennius salei, Ctenidae). Toxicon. 1995;33(10):1347–57.
Bücherl W. Spiders. In: Bücherl W, Buckley EE, editors. Venomous animals and their venoms, Venomous invertebrates, vol. III. New York: Academic; 1971.
Campon FF. Group foraging in the colonial spider Parawixia bistriata (Araneidae): effect of resource levels and prey size. Anim Behav. 2007;74:1551–62.
Carlin NF, David GS. The “bouncer” defense of Odontomachus ruginodis and other Odontomachine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche. 1989;96(1–2):1–19.
Casewell NR, Wuster W, Vonk FJ, Harrison RA, Fry BG. Complex cocktails: the evolutionary novelty of venoms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013;28(4):219–29.
Celerier ML, Paris C, Lange C. Venom of an aggressive African Theraphosidae (Scodra griseipes): milking the venom, a study of its toxicity and its characterization. Toxicon. 1993;31(5):577–90.
Corning PA. Evolution ‘on purpose’: how behaviour has shaped the evolutionary process. Biol J Linn Soc. 2014;112(2):242–60.
Cuthill IC, Houston AI. Managing time and energy. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB, editors. Behavioural ecology. Oxford: Blackwell; 1997.
Djieto-Lordon C, Orivel J, Dejean A. Predatory behavior of the African ponerine ant Platythyrea modesta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology. 2001;38(3A):303–15.
Duckworth RA. The role of behavior in evolution: a search for mechanism. Evol Ecol. 2009;23(4):513–31.
Dutertre S, Jin AH, Vetter I, Hamilton B, Sunagar K, Lavergne V, Dutertre V, Fry BG, Antunes A, Venter DJ, Alewood PF, Lewis RJ. Evolution of separate predation- and defence-evoked venoms in carnivorous cone snails. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3521, doi: 10.1038/ncomms4521.
Edmunds MC, Sibly RM. Optimal sting use in the feeding behavior of the scorpion Hadrurus spadix. J Arachnol. 2010;38(1):123–5.
Fink LS. Venom spitting by the Green Lynx spider, Peucetia viridans (Araneae, Oxyopidae). J Arachnol. 1984;12(3):372–3.
Foelix RF. Biology of the spiders. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
Freyvogel TA, Honegger CG, Maretic Z. On the biology and toxicity of the East African spider Pterinochilus spec. Acta Trop. 1968;25(3):217–55.
Fry BG, Roelants K, Champagne DE, Scheib H, Tyndall JDA, King GF, Nevalainen TJ, Norman JA, Lewis RJ, Norton RS, Renjifo C, de la Vega RCR. The toxicogenomic multiverse: convergent recruitment of proteins into animal venoms. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2009;10:483–511.
Gibbons JW, Dorcas ME. Defensive behavior of cottonmouths (Agkistrodon piscivorus) toward humans. Copeia. 2002;1:195–8.
Gilbert C, Rayor LS. Predatory behavior of spitting spiders (Araneae, Scytodidae) and the evolution of prey wrapping. J Arachnol. 1985;13(2):231–41.
Grinsted L, Pruitt JN, Settepani V, Bilde T. Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2013;280(1767):20131407, doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.1407 .
Haight KL. Defensiveness of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, is increased during colony rafting. Insect Soc. 2006;53(1):32–6.
Harwood RH. Predatory behavior of Argiope aurantia (Lucas). Am Midl Nat. 1974;91(1):130–9.
Hayes WK. Prey-handling and envenomation strategies of Prairie Rattlesnakes (Crotalus v. viridis) feeding on mice and sparrows. J Herpetol. 1992;26(4):496–9.
Hayes WK. Effects of hunger on striking, prey-handling, and venom expenditure of Prairie Rattlesnakes (Crotalus v. viridis). Herpetologica. 1993;49(3):305–10.
Hayes WK. The snake venom-metering controversy: levels of analysis, assumptions, and evidence. In: Hayes WK, Beaman KR, Cardwell MD, Bush SP, editors. The biology of rattlesnakes. Loma Linda: Loma Linda University Press; 2008.
Hayes WK, Herbert SS, Rehling GC, Bennaro JF. Factors that influence venom expenditure in viperids and other snake species during predatory and defensive contexts. In: Schuett GW, Hoggren M, Douglas ME, Greene HW, editors. Biology of the vipers. Eagle Mountain: Eagle Mountain Publishers; 2002.
Heatwole H. Defensive behaviour of some Panamanian scorpions. Caribb J Sci. 1967;7(1–2):15–7.
Herzig V. Ontogenesis, gender, and molting influence the venom yield in the spider Coremiocnemis tropix (Araneae, Theraphosidae). J Venom Res. 2010;1:76–83.
Herzig V, Khalife AA, Chong Y, Isbister GK, Currie BJ, Churchill TB, Horner S, Escoubas P, Nicholson GM, Hodgson WC. Intersexual variations in Northern (Missulena pruinosa) and Eastern (M. bradleyi) mouse spider venom. Toxicon. 2008;51(7):1167–77.
Hostettler S, Nentwig W. Olfactory information saves venom during prey-capture of the hunting spider Cupiennius salei (Araneae: Ctenidae). Funct Ecol. 2006;20(2):369–75.
Isbister GK. Mouse spider bites (Missulena spp.) and their medical importance: a systematic review. Med J Aust. 2004;180(5):225–7.
Jackson RR, Cross FR. Spider cognition. In: Casas J, editor. Advances in insect physiology, Spider physiology and behaviour – behaviour, vol. 41. London: Academic\Elsevier Science; 2011.
King GF, Hardy MC. Spider-venom peptides: structure, pharmacology, and potential for control of insect pests. In: Berenbaum MR, editor. Annual review of entomology, vol. 58. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews; 2013.
Kuhn-Nentwig L, Stocklin R, Nentwig W. Venom composition and strategies in spiders: is everything possible? In: Casas J, editor. Advances in insect physiology. Burlington: Academic; 2011.
Lamarck JB. Zoological philosophy (Elliot H, trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1984 [1809].
Libersat F, Gal R. Wasp voodoo rituals, venom-cocktails, and the zombification of cockroach hosts. Integr Comp Biol. 2014;54(2):129–42.
Malli H, Imboden H, Kuhn-Nentwig L. Quantifying the venom dose of the spider Cupiennius salei using monoclonal antibodies. Toxicon. 1998;36(12):1959–69.
Malli H, Kuhn-Nentwig L, Imboden H, Nentwig W. Effects of size, motility and paralysation time of prey on the quantity of venom injected by the hunting spider Cupiennius salei. J Exp Biol. 1999;202(15):2083–9.
Malli H, Kuhn-Nentwig L, Imboden H, Moon MJ, Wyler T. Immunocytochemical localization and secretion process of the toxin CSTX-1 in the venom gland of the wandering spider Cupiennius salei (Araneae: Ctenidae). Cell Tissue Res. 2000;299(3):417–26.
Maretic Z. Spider venoms and their effect. In: Nentwig W, Aitchison-Benell CW, editors. Ecophysiology of spiders. Berlin: Springer; 1987.
McCormick SJ, Polis GA. Prey, predators, and parasites. In: Polis GA, editor. The biology of scorpions. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1990.
Mebs D. Venomous and poisonous animals: a handbook for biologists, toxicologists and toxinologists, physicians and pharmacists. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2002.
Menzel R. Learning, memory, and cognition: animal perspectives. In: Galizia CG, Lledo PM, editors. Neurosciences–from molecule to behavior: a university textbook. Heidelberg: Springer; 2013.
Morgenstern D, King GF. The venom optimization hypothesis revisited. Toxicon. 2013;63:120–8.
Morgenstern D, Hamilton B, Sher D, Jones A, Mattius G, Zlotkin E, Venter D, King GF. The bio-logic of venom complexity. Toxicon. 2012;60(2):241–2.
Morse DH. Location of successful strikes on prey by juvenile crab spiders Misumena vatia (Araneae, Thomisidae). J Arachnol. 1999;27(1):171–5.
Natural History Museum Bern. World spider catalog [Internet]. 2015 [cited 3 Mar 2015]. Available from: http://wsc.nmbe.ch
Nelsen DR, Kelln W, Hayes WK. Poke but don’t pinch: risk assessment and venom metering in the western black widow spider, Latrodectus hesperus. Anim Behav. 2014a;89:107–14.
Nelsen DR, Nisani Z, Cooper AM, Fox GA, Gren ECK, Corbit AG, Hayes WK. Poisons, toxungens, and venoms: redefining and classifying toxic biological secretions and the organisms that employ them. Biol Rev. 2014b;89(2):450–65.
Nentwig W, Kuhn-Nentwig L. Main components of spider venoms. In: Nentwig W, editor. Spider ecophysiology. Heidelberg: Springer; 2013.
Nisani Z, Hayes WK. Defensive stinging by Parabuthus transvaalicus scorpions: risk assessment and venom metering. Anim Behav. 2011;81(3):627–33.
Parks J, Stoecker WV, Kristensen C. Observations on Loxosceles reclusa (Araneae, Sicariidae) feeding on short-horned grasshoppers. J Arachnol. 2006;34(1):221–6.
Pekar S, Toft S. Trophic specialisation in a predatory group: the case of prey-specialised spiders (Araneae). Biol Rev. 2014. doi:10.1111/brv.12133.
Pekar S, Sedo O, Liznarova E, Korenko S, Zdrahal Z. David and Goliath: potent venom of an ant-eating spider (Araneae) enables capture of a giant prey. Naturwissenschaften. 2014;101(7):533–40.
Perret BA. Determination of amount of venom released by striking tarantulas. J Georgia Entomol Soc. 1977a;12(4):329–33.
Perret BA. Venom regeneration in tarantula spiders—I: analysis of venom produced at different time intervals. Comp Biochem Physiol A: Mol Integr Physiol. 1977b;56(4):607–13.
Perry CJ, Barron AB, Cheng K. Invertebrate learning and cognition: relating phenomena to neural substrate. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013;4(5):561–82.
Pollard SD. The feeding strategy of a crab spider, Diaea sp. indet (Araneae, Thomisidae): post-capture decision rules. J Zool. 1990;222:601–15.
Quintero-Hernandez V, Ortiz E, Rendon-Anaya M, Schwartz EF, Becerril B, Corzo G, Possani LD. Scorpion and spider venom peptides: gene cloning and peptide expression. Toxicon. 2011;58(8):644–63.
Rezac M, Pekar S, Lubin Y. How oniscophagous spiders overcome woodlouse armour. J Zool. 2008;275(1):64–71.
Robinson MH. Predatory behavior of Argiope argentata (Fabricius). Am Zool. 1969;9(1):161–73.
Robinson MH, Olazarri J. Units of behavior and complex sequences in the predatory behavior of Argiope argentata (Fabricius): (Araneae: Araneidae). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1971.
Robinson MH, Mirick H, Turner O. The predatory behavior of some araneid spiders and the origin of immobilization wrapping. Psyche. 1969;76:487–501.
Schenberg S, Pereira-Lima FA. Venoms of ctenidae. In: Bettini S, editor. Arthropod venoms, Handbook of experimental pharmacology, vol. 48. Berlin: Springer; 1978. p. 215–45.
Schenberg S, Pereira-LIma FA, Nogueira-Schiripa LN, Nagamori A. Unparalleled regeneration of snake venom components in successive milkings. Toxicon. 1970;8(2):152.
Schmidt JO. Hymenopteran venoms: striving toward the ultimate defense against vertebrates. In: Evans DL, Schmidt JO, editors. Insect defenses: adaptive mechanisms and strategies of prey and predators. Albany: State University of New York; 1990.
Shettleworth SJ. Fundamentals of comparative cognition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Steiner AL. Stinging behaviour of solitary wasps. In: Piek T, editor. Venoms of the hymenoptera. London: Academic; 1986.
Suter RB, Stratton GE. Predation by spitting spiders: elaborate venom gland, intricate delivery system. In: Nentwig W, editor. Spider ecophysiology. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012.
Wcislo WT. Behavioral environments and evolutionary change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1989;20:137–69.
Wigger E, Kuhn-Nentwig L, Nentwig W. The venom optimisation hypothesis: a spider injects large venom quantities only into difficult prey types. Toxicon. 2002;40(6):749–52.
Willey MB, Johnson MA, Adler PH. Predatory behavior of the basilica spider, Mecynogea lemniscata (Araneae, Araneidae). Psyche. 1992;99:153–68.
Wolf M, Weissing FJ. Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012;27(8):452–61.
Wullschleger B, Nentwig W. Influence of venom availability on a spider’s prey-choice behaviour. Funct Ecol. 2002;16(6):802–7.
Zobel-Thropp PA, Correa SM, Garb JE, Binford GJ. Spit and venom from scytodes spiders: a diverse and distinct cocktail. J Proteome Res. 2014;13(2):817–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Cooper, A.M., Nelsen, D.R., Hayes, W.K. (2015). The Strategic Use of Venom by Spiders. In: Gopalakrishnakone, P., Malhotra, A. (eds) Evolution of Venomous Animals and Their Toxins. Toxinology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6727-0_13-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6727-0_13-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6727-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences