Advertisement

Multi-Axis Force-Torque Sensor

  • Jung-Hoon Kim
Reference work entry

Abstract

A force-torque sensor is the essential sensor in humanoid robots, and it is used to measure interaction between the robot and environment. By measuring the force and torque information at the foot, it is possible to calculate the ZMP (zero moment point), which is the important criterion for the dynamic stability of biped humanoid robot. Force-torque information at the wrist is also useful in manipulation in human environment especially when it interacts with human with its hands. At least four force-torque sensors are required for a full body humanoid robot, but these are the most expensive components. Limited number of companies in global market are providing multi-axis force-torque sensors with extremely high price. If the force-torque sensor is realized at a low cost, humanoid research will be promoted and humanoid robots will be widely used in many fields in the future. To facilitate low-cost development of force torque sensors in humanoid robots, this chapter summarizes several topics such as ZMP concept, strain gauge measurements, electrical interfaces, and some examples of sensors.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Vukobratović, D. Juričić, Contribution to the synthesis of biped gait, in Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium, Technical and Biological Problem on Control, Erevan, USSR, 1968Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Vukobratović, B. Borovac, Zero-moment point – thirty five years of its life. Int. J. Hum. Robot. 1(1), 157–173 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Hirai, M. Hirose, Y. Haikawa, T. Takenaka, The development of Honda humanoid robot, in Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automations, Leuven, 1998, pp. 1321–1326Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Nishiwaki, K. Nagasaka, M. Inaba, H. Inoue, Generation of reactive stepping motion for a humanoid by dynamically stable mixture of pre-designed motions, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 6, Tokyo, 1999, pp. 902–907Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Takanishi, Y. Egusa, M. Tochizawa, T. Takeya, I. Kato, Realization of dynamic walking stabilized with trunk motion, in Proceedings of ROMANSY 7, Udine, 1988, pp. 68–79Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Nagasaka, H. Inoue, M. Inaba, Dynamic walking pattern generation for a humanoid robot based on optimal gradient method, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Tokyo, 1999, pp. 908–913Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Kajita, F. Kanehiro, K. Kaneko, K. Fujiwara, K. Harada, K. Yokoi, H. Hirukawa, Biped walking pattern generation by using preview control of zero-moment point, in Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, 2003, pp. 1620–1626Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.H. Kim, J.H. Choi, B.K. Cho, Walking pattern generation for a biped walking robot using convolution sum. Adv. Robot. 25(9–10), 1115–1137 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Q. Li, A. Takanishi, I. Kato, A biped walking robot having a ZMP measurement system using universal force-moment sensors, in International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Osaka, 1991, pp. 1568–1573Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.H. Kim, A study on the realization of dynamic gait for a biped humanoid robot, Doctoral Thesis, KAIST, 2004Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Kajita, H. Hirukawa, K. Harada, K. Yokoi, Introduction to Humanoid Robotics, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol 101 (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.H. Kim, S.W. Park, I.W. Park, J.H. Oh, Development of a humanoid biped walking robot platform KHR-1 – initial design and its performance evaluation, in Proceedings of 3rd IARP International Workshop on Humanoid and Human Friendly Robotics, 2002, pp. 14–21Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E.O. Doebelin, Measurement Systems – Application and Design, 4th edn. (Mcgraw-Hill, New York, 1990)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.S. Figliola, D.E. Beasley, Theory and Design for Mechanical Measurements, 6th edn. (Wiley, New Jersy 2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Löffler, M. Gienger, F. Pfeiffer, Sensor and control design of a dynamically stable biped robot, in International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Taipei, 2003, pp. 14–19Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.H. Kim, J.H. Oh, Realization of dynamic walking for the humanoid platform KHR-1. Adv. Robot. 18(7), 749–768 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    I.W. Park, J.Y. Kim, J. Lee, J.H. Oh, Mechanical design of the humanoid robot platform, HUBO, in IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2005, pp. 321–326Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B.K. Cho, J.H. Oh, J.H. Kim, Online balance controllers for a hopping and running humanoid robot. Adv. Robot. 25(9–10), 1209–1225 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A.R. Son, J.H. Oh, T.Y. Noh, W.S. Yoo, Development of a mechanically coupled, 6-axis force-torque sensor for humanoid robots, in ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, 2007Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.K. Kang, J.H. Kim, Structural analysis and performance evaluation about attachment error of Y-shaped six-axis force/torque Sensor, in the 7th Korea Robotics Society Annual Conference (in Korean), 2012, pp. 387–390Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.W. Joo, K.S. Na, D.I. Kang, Design and evaluation of a six-component load cell. Measurement 32, 125–133 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    L. Schickl, K. Dorer, M. Wulker, Y. D’Antilio, U. Hochberg, Development of a six-axis force and torque sensor for the humanoid robot sweaty 2.0, in the 11th Workshop on Humanoid Soccer Robots at 16th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Cancun, 2016Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    M.K. Kang, S. Lee, J.H. Kim, Shape optimization of a mechanically decoupled six-axis force/torque sensor. Sensors Actuators A Phys. 209, 41–51 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. Costa, N. Smaby, Calibration and precision manufacturing. ME 319-Robotics and Vision Lab (1997). www-cdr.stanford.edu/cutkosky/me319/cal.pdfGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. Voyles, J. Morrow, P. Khosla, Shape from motion approach to rapid and precise force/torque sensor calibration. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control. 119(2), 229–235 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Construction Robot and Automation Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringYonsei UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations