Characteristics
This entry encompasses two interrelated though distinct approaches to mathematics education: the anthropological theory of the didactic (ATD for short) and the joint action theory in didactics (JATD). Historically, the germs of ATD are to be found in the theory of didactic transposition (Chevallard 1991), whose scope was at first limited to the genesis and the ensuing peculiarities of the (mathematical) “contents” studied at school; from this perspective, ATD should be regarded as the result of a definite effort to go further by providing a unitary theory of didactic phenomena as defined in what follows. As for JATD, it has emerged from the theory of didactic situations (Brousseau 1997) and the anthropological theory of the didactic by focusing on the very nature of the communicational epistemic process within didactic transactions. ATD and JATD share a common conception of knowledge as a practice and a discourse on practice together – i.e., as a praxeology – along...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bosch M et al (eds) (2011) Un panorama de la TAD. An overview of ATD. CRM, Barcelona. http://www.recercat.net/bitstream/handle/2072/200617/Documents10_OnlinePDF.pdf?sequence=1
Bronner A et al (eds) (2010) Apports de la théorie anthropologique du didactique. Diffuser les mathématiques (et les autres savoirs) comme outils de connaissance et d’action. IUFM, Montpellier
Brousseau G (1997) Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Chevallard Y (1980) The didactics of mathematics: its problematic and related research. Rercherches en Didactique des Mathématiques 2(1):146–157
Chevallard Y (1990) On mathematics education and culture: critical afterthoughts. Educ Stud Math 21:3–27
Chevallard Y (1991) La transposition didactique – Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. La pensée sauvage, Grenoble
Chevallard Y (1992) Fundamental concepts in didactics: perspectives provided by an anthropological approach. In: Douady R, Mercier A (eds) Research in didactiqueof mathematics, selected papers. La pensée sauvage, Grenoble, pp 131–167
Chevallard Y (2006) Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. In: Bosch M (ed) Proceedings of CERME 4. Fundemi IQS, Barcelone, pp 21–30
Chevallard Y (2007) Readjusting didactics to a changing epistemology. Eur Educ Res J 6(2):131–134
Chevallard Y (to appear) Teaching mathematics in tomorrow’s society: a case for an oncoming counterparadigm. Regular lecture at ICME-12 (Seoul, 8–15 July 2012). http://www.icme12.org/upload/submission/1985_F_OnlinePDF.pdf
Chevallard Y, Ladage C (2008) E-learning as a touchstone for didactic theory, and conversely. J E-Learn Knowl Soc 4(2):163–171
Lewin K (1952) Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin. Tavistock, London
Ligozat F, Schubauer-Leoni M-L (2009) The joint action theory in didactics. Why do we need it in the case of teaching and learning mathematics. In: Durand-Guerrier V, Soury-Lavergne S, Arzarello F (eds) Proceedings of CERME6, January 28th–February 1st 2009, Lyon, pp 1615–1624. INRP. www.inrp.fr/editions/cerme6
Mercier A, Sensevy G, Schubauer-Leoni M-L (2000) How social interactions within a class depend on the teacher’s assessment of the various pupil’s mathematical capabilities, a case study. ZDM Int J Math Educ 32(5):126–130
Ruiz-Higueras L, Estepa A, Javier GF (eds) (2007) Sociedad, Escuela y Matemáticas. Aportaciones de la Teoría Antropológica de lo Didáctico(TAD). Universidad de Jaén, Jaén
Sensevy G (2011a) Overcoming fragmentation: towards a joint action theory in didactics. In: Hudson B, Meyer M (eds) Beyond fragmentation: didactics, learning and teaching in Europe. Barbara Budrich, Opladen/Farmington Hills, pp 60–76
Sensevy G (2011b) Patterns of didactic intentions. Thought collective and documentation work. In: Gueudet G, Pepin B, Trouche L (eds) From text to “lived” resources: mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. Springer, New York, pp 43–57
Sensevy G (2012) About the joint action theory in didactics. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 15(3):503–516. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11618-012-0305-9#
Sensevy G, Forest D (2012) Semiosis process in instructional practice. In: ICLS2012 proceedings, vol 1, pp 17–24. http://fr.scribd.com/doc/109869021/ICLS2012-Proceedings-Vol-1-2012[35/500−42/500]
Sensevy G, Mercier A, Schubauer-Leoni M-L, Ligozat F, Perrot G (2005) An attempt to model the teacher’s action in mathematics. Educ Stud Math 59(1):153–181
Sensevy G, Tiberghien A, Santini J, Laubé S, Griggs P (2008) Modelling, an epistemological approach: cases studies and implications for science teaching. Sci Educ 92(3):424–446
Tiberghien A, Sensevy G (2012) Video studies: time and duration in the teaching-learning processes In: Dillon J, Jorde D (eds) Science education research and practice in Europe: retrospective and prospective, pp 141–179. http://www.amazon.fr/Science-Education-Research-Practice-Europe/dp/9460918999
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Chevallard, Y., Sensevy, G. (2014). Anthropological Approaches in Mathematics Education, French Perspectives. In: Lerman, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4977-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4978-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law