# Instrumentation in Mathematics Education

**DOI:**https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_80

## Definition

In order to define *instrumentation* in the context of mathematics education, it is necessary to define *instruments*: at this stage of this article, we do not differentiate between *instruments* and *artifacts*, i.e., we regard them as things that are *created* and *used* by humans to help, assist, support, enlarge, and empower their activity. Instrumentation is the action to give someone an *instrument*, or the process by which someone acquires an instrument, in order to perform a given activity. The notion of instrumentation is part of a network of concepts; we will focus here on the main dialectical relationships between them.

### Instrumentation and Instruction

Contrary to the common perception that mathematics is a pure mental activity, the importance of instruments in mathematical activity has been largely acknowledged: “the development of mathematics has always been dependent upon the material and symbolic tools available for mathematics computations” (Artigue 2002, p. 245). What is...

## Keywords

Appropriation Artifact Document Instrumental genesis Instrumentalization Instrumentation Orchestration Resources System of Instruments## Notes

### Acknowledgments

Thanks to Ghislaine Gueudet and Birgit Pepin for their reading of the preliminary version of this article and their inspiring comments.

## References

- Artigue M (2002) Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: the genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. Int J Comput Math Learn 7(3):245–274Google Scholar
- Drijvers P, Godino JD, Font V, Trouche L (2012) One episode, two lenses. A reflective analysis of student learning with computer algebra from instrumental and onto-semiotic perspectives. Educ Stud Math 82:23–49. doi 10.1007/s10649-012-9416-8Google Scholar
- Drijvers P, Doorman M, Boon P, Reed H, Gravemeijer K (2010) The teacher and the tool: instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educ Stud Math 75(2):213–234Google Scholar
- Engeström Y, Miettinen R, Punamäki R-L (1999) Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Gueudet G, Trouche L (2009) Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educ Stud Math 71(3):199–218. doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9159-8Google Scholar
- Gueudet G, Pepin B, Trouche L (eds) (2012) From textbooks to ‘lived’ resources: mathematics curriculum materials and teacher documentation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Guin D, Ruthven K, Trouche L (eds) (2005) The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Guin D, Trouche L (1999) The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments. The case of calculators. Int J Comput Math Learn 3(3):195–227Google Scholar
- Lagrange J-B, Artigue M, Laborde C, Trouche L (2003) Technology and mathematics education: a multidimensional study of the evolution of research and innovation. In: Bishop AJ, Clements MA, Keitel C, Kilpatrick J, Leung FKS (eds) Second international handbook of mathematics education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 239–271Google Scholar
- Maschietto M, Trouche L (2010) Mathematics learning and tools from theoretical, historical and practical points of view: the productive notion of mathematics laboratories. ZDM Int J Math Educ 42(1):33–47. doi:10.1007/s11858-009-0215-3Google Scholar
- Noss R, Hoyles C (1996) Windows on mathematical meanings – learning cultures and computers. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Proust C (2012) Masters’ writings and students’ writings : school material in Mesopotamia. In: Gueudet G, Pepin B, Trouche L (eds) From text to ‘lived’ resources. Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. Springer, New York, pp 161–179Google Scholar
- Salaün J-M (2012) Vu, lu, su, les architectes de l’information face à l’oligopole du web. La découverte, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Trouche L (2004) Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. Int J Comput Math Learn 9:281–307Google Scholar
- Trouche L, Drijvers P (2010) Handheld technology for mathematics education, flashback to the future. ZDM Int J Mathe Educ 42(7):667–681, 10.1007/s11858-010-0269-2Google Scholar
- Vergnaud G (1996) The theory of conceptual fields. In: Steffe LP, Nesher P, Cobb P, Goldin GA, Greer B (eds) Theories of mathematical learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass, Mahwah, pp 219–239Google Scholar
- Verillon P, Rabardel P (1995) Cognition and artifact: a contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrument activity. Eur J Psychol Educ 9(3):77–101Google Scholar
- Vygotsky LS (1962) Thought and language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Vygotsky LS (1981) The instrumental method in psychology. In: Wertsch JW (ed) The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. M.E Sharpe, ArmonkGoogle Scholar