Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

2014 Edition
| Editors: Stephen Lerman

Gender in Mathematics Education

  • Helen Forgasz
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_64

Issues of Definition

According to Haig (2004), it was the feminist scholars of the 1970s who adopted gender “as a way of distinguishing ‘socially constructed’ aspects of male–female differences (gender) from ‘biologically determined’ aspects (sex)” (p. 87). In the mathematics education literature, the gradual shift from “sex differences” to “gender differences” occurred during the period from the late 1970s into the 1980s. Fennema’s (1974) seminal work in the field was reported as “sex” differences in mathematics achievement, and in the renowned Fennema and Sherman studies on affective factors (e.g., Fennema and Sherman 1977), the findings were also described as “sex” differences. As noted by Haig (2004), in more recent times, the “distinction is now only fitfully respected and gender is often used as a simple synonym of sex” (p. 97); this is also evident in the mathematics education literature.

In this encyclopedia entry, the term “gender” is used in the sense that Leder (1992)...

Keywords

Gender differences Sex differences Equity Women's movement Feminism Social justice Explanatory models Technology Neuroscience 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Becker JR (1995) Women’s ways of knowing in mathematics. In: Rogers P, Kaiser G (eds) Equity in mathematics education. Influences of feminism and culture. Falmer Press, London, pp 163–174Google Scholar
  2. Belenky MF, Clinchy BM, Goldberger NR, Tarule JM (1986) Women’s ways of knowing: the development of self, voice, and mind. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Burton L (ed) (1990) Gender and mathematics: an international perspective. Cassell Educational, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton L (1995) Moving towards a feminist epistemology of mathematics. Educ Stud Math 28(3):275–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eccles J, Adler TF, Futterman R, Goff SB, Kaczala CM, Meece JL, Midgley C (1985) Self-perceptions, task perceptions, socializing influences, and the decision to enroll in mathematics. In Chipman SF, Brush LR, Wilson DM (eds) Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 95–121Google Scholar
  6. Ethington CA (1992) Gender differences in a psychological model of mathematics achievement. J Res Math Educ 23(2):166–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fennema E (1974) Mathematics learning and the sexes: a review. J Res Math Educ 5(3):126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fennema E (1995) Mathematics, gender and research. In: Grevholm B, Hanna G (eds) Gender and mathematics education. Lund University Press, Lund, pp 21–38Google Scholar
  9. Fennema E, Leder GC (eds) (1990) Mathematics and gender. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Fennema E, Peterson P (1985) Autonomous learning behavior: a possible explanation of gender-related differences in mathematics. In: Wilkinson LC, Marrett CB (eds) Gender related differences in classroom interaction. Academic, New York, pp 17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fennema E, Sherman J (1977) Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. Am Educ Res J 14(1):51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forgasz HJ, Rivera F (eds) (2012) Towards equity in mathematics education: gender, culture and diversity. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  13. Forgasz HJ, Vale C, Ursini S (2010) Technology for mathematics education: equity, access, and agency. In: Hoyles C, Lagrange J-B (eds) Mathematics education and technology – rethinking the terrain. Springer, New York, pp 385–404Google Scholar
  14. Haig D (2004) The inexorable rise of gender and the decline of sex: social change in academic titles, 1945–2001. Arch Sex Behav 33:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henrion C (1997) Women in mathematics. The addition of difference. Indiana University Press, Bloomington/IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaiser G, Rogers P (1995) Introduction: equity in mathematics education. In: Rogers P, Kaiser G (eds) Equity in mathematics education. Influences of feminism and culture. Falmer Press, London, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  17. Keitel C (ed) (1998) Social justice and mathematics: gender, class, ethnicity and the politics of schooling. Freie Universität Berlin, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  18. Leder GC (1990) Gender differences in mathematics: an overview. In: Fennema E, Leder GC (eds) Mathematics and gender. Teachers College Press, New York, pp 10–26Google Scholar
  19. Leder GC (1992) Mathematics and gender: changing perspectives. In: Grouws DA (ed) Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York, pp 597–622Google Scholar
  20. Leder GC, Forgasz HJ, Solar C (1996) Research and intervention programs in mathematics education: a gendered issue. In: Bishop A, Clements K, Keitel C, Kilpatrick J, Laborde C (eds) International handbook of mathematics education, Part 2. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 945–985Google Scholar
  21. Morrow C, Perl T (1998) Notable women in mathematics. A biographical dictionary. Greenwood Press, WestportGoogle Scholar
  22. Perl T (1978) Math equals: biographies of women mathematicians + related activities. Addison-Wesley, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  23. Reyes LH, Stanic GMA (1988) Race, sex, socioeconomic status and mathematics. J Res Math Educ 19:26–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rogers P, Kaiser G (eds) (1995) Equity in mathematics education: influences of feminism and culture. The Falmer Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Vale C (2010) Gender mainstreaming: maintaining attention on gender equality. In: Forgasz HJ, Rossi Becker J, Lee K, Steinthorsdottir OB (eds) International perspectives on gender and mathematics Education. Information Age, Charlotte, pp 111–143Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia