Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

Editors: Stephen Lerman

Elkonin and Davydov Curriculum in Mathematics Education

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_56

Definition

The Elkonin-Davydov mathematics curriculum was an elementary mathematics curriculum developed in Russia based on Russian activity theory. In recent years, the original Russian curriculum has been expanded to include grades K–8 and has been refined into several different curricula. In addition, research projects in other countries (e.g., USA) have investigated applications with local populations.

Characteristics and Origin

In 1959, Daniil Borissowitsch Elkonin (1904–1984) and Vasily Vasil’evich Davydov (1930–1998), Russian psychologists and students of Lev Vygotsky, developed an elementary mathematics curriculum. Their work was initially situated in experimental school #91 in Moscow where their team functioned as researchers and teachers. The project was grounded in Russian activity theory, which grew out of the cultural-historical theory of Vygotsky.

Davydov was critical of the existing schooling system and argued that traditional pedagogy failed to develop a general concept...

This is a preview of subscription access content, login to check access

Keywords

Developmental learning Activity theory Sociocultural theory Vygotsky Curriculum Measurement 

References

  1. Davydov VV (1990) On the potential for implementing the idea of theoretical generalization in solving problems in educational psychology. In: Kilpatrick J (ed) Types of generalization in instruction: logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula, soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching mathematics, vol 2. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, pp 144–174Google Scholar
  2. Davydov VV, Gorbov S, Mukulina T, Savelyeva M, Tabachnikova N (1999) Mathematics. Moscow Press, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  3. Dougherty BJ (2008) Measure up: a quantitative view of early algebra. In: Kaput JJ, Carraher DW, Blanton ML (eds) Algebra in the early grades. Erlbaum, Mahweh, pp 389–412Google Scholar
  4. Dougherty BJ, Okazaki C, Zenigami F, Venenciano L (2004) Measure up: grade 1–4. University of Hawai’i, Curriculum Research & Development Group, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  5. Hart KM, Brown ML, Kerslake DM, Küchemann DE, Ruddock G (1985) Chelsea diagnostic mathematics tests. NFER-NELSON, BerkshireGoogle Scholar
  6. Leont’ev AN (1978) Activity, consciousness, and personality (trans: Hall MJ). Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  7. Nezhnov PG et al (eds) (2009) Diagnosis of learning success in elementary school. The Open Institute Developmental Education, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. Schmittau J (2005) The development of algebraic thinking: a vygotskian perspective. ZDM Int J Math Educ 37(1):16–22Google Scholar
  9. Slovin H, Venenciano L (2008) Success in algebra. In: Figueras O, Cortina JL, Alatorre S, Rojano T, Sepulveda A (eds) Proceedings of the joint meeting PME 32 and PME-NA XXX. Morelia, Mexico, pp 273–280Google Scholar
  10. Vygotsky LS (1987) Thinking and speech. In: Rieber RW, Carton AS (eds) The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, volume 1: Problems of general psychology (trans: Minick N). Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Vysotskaia EV, Pavlova VV (2007) Activity-based analysis of subject matter in different educational systems and the quality of the learned action. In: Rubtsov VV, Polivanova NI (eds) Educational environment as a factor in the mental development of students. IG-SOTSIN, Moscow/Obninsk, pp 223–250 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. Zuckerman GA (2005) The elkonin-davydov system as a resource for enhancing the competence of Russian schoolchildren. Psychol Issue 4:84–95 (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human DevelopmentNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA