Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

2014 Edition
| Editors: Stephen Lerman

Mathematics Curriculum Evaluation

  • Iman Osta
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_168


Mathematics curriculum evaluation is the process of collecting and analyzing data with the purpose of making decisions about whether to keep, modify, or completely change a mathematics curriculum or some of its components.

Notions and Meanings

Though the definition above provides a sense of what mathematics curriculum evaluation means, the fact is that because of evasive meanings of the terms involved, it is difficult to adopt one agreed-upon definition. Defining mathematics curriculum evaluation draws on the more general concepts of curriculum and curriculum evaluation, taking into consideration the specific characteristics of mathematics as a discipline.


Historically, the term curriculumhas been used in different meanings, including one or more of the following: goals and objectives determining the expectations of learning that are set by policy makers, textbooks used to guide teaching, instructional methods, plan of experiences, and/or actual experiences that...


Mathematics curricula Curriculum evaluation Assessment Curriculum coherence Alignment Math standards Mathematical competencies 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Akker JV (2003) Curriculum perspectives: an introduction. In: Akker JV, Hameyer U, Kuiper W (eds) Curriculum landscapes and trends. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  2. Artigue M, Bednarz N (2012) Évolutions curriculaires récentes dans l’enseignement des mathématiques de l’espace francophone. In: Dorier JL, Coutat S (eds) Enseignement des mathématiques et contrat social: enjeux et défis pour le 21e siècle – Actes du colloque EMF2012 – Plénières, pp 7–23. http://www.emf2012.unige.ch/index.php/actes-emf-2012
  3. Bauersfeld H (1979) Research related to the mathematical learning process. In: Steiner HG, Christiansen B (eds) New trends in mathematics teaching, vol IV. UNESCO, Paris, pp 199–213Google Scholar
  4. Bednarz N, Maheux JF, Proulx J (2012) Design curriculaire et vision des mathématiques au Québec – Une étude cas dans le cadre des tables rondes EMF2012: évolutions curriculaires récentes dans l’enseignement des mathématiques de l’espace francophone. In: Dorier JL, Coutat S (eds) Enseignement des mathématiques et contrat social: enjeux et défis pour le 21e siècle – Actes du colloque EMF2012 – Plénières. pp 66–107. http://www.emf2012.unige.ch/index.php/actes-emf-2012
  5. Begle EG, Wilson GW (1970) Evaluation of mathematics programs. In: Begle EG (ed) Mathematics education. The sixty-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (NSSE). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 367–404Google Scholar
  6. Blume G, Nicely R (1991) A guide for reviewing school mathematics programs. NCTM & ASCD, RestonGoogle Scholar
  7. Bright GW, Upichard AE, Jetton JH (1993) Mathematics programs: a guide to evaluation. ‘The program evaluation guides for schools’ series. Corwin Press, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  8. Cai J (2010) Evaluation of mathematics education programs. In: Baker E, McGraw B, Peterson P (eds) International encyclopedia of education, vol 3. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 653–659Google Scholar
  9. CCSS Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010) Preparing America’s students for college and careers. http://www.corestandards.org/. Accessed 12 Jan 2013
  10. Houang R, Schmidt W (2008) TIMSS international curriculum analysis and measuring educational opportunities. 3rd IEA international research conference, 18–20 Sept 2008, Taipei, Chinese Taipei. http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/IRC/IRC_2008/Papers/IRC2008_Houang_Schmidt.pdf Accessed 20 Mar 2013
  11. Howson AG, Keitel C, Kilpatrick J (1981) Curriculum development in mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989) Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. NCTM, RestonGoogle Scholar
  13. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1995) Assessment standards for school mathematics. NCTM, RestonGoogle Scholar
  14. Niss M (1993) Cases of assessment in mathematics education, vol 1, New ICMI studies. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  15. Niss M (2003) Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: the Danish KOM project. In Gagatsis A, Papastavridis S (eds) 3rd Mediterranean conference on mathematical education – Athens, Hellas, 3–5 Jan 2003. Hellenic Mathematical Society, Athens, pp 116–124. http://www.math.chalmers.se/Math/Grundutb/CTH/mve375/1213/docs/KOMkompetenser.pdf Accessed 3 Oct 2013
  16. Osta I (2007) Developing and piloting a framework for studying the alignment of national mathematics examinations with the curriculum: the case of Lebanon. J Educ Res Eval 13(2):171–198Google Scholar
  17. Porter AC (2004) Curriculum assessment (Additional SCALE Research Publications and Products: Goals 1, 2, and 4). Vanderbilt University, NashvilleGoogle Scholar
  18. Romberg TA, Wilson L, Khaketla M (1991) The alignment of six standardized tests with NCTM standards. In: Stenmark JK (ed) Mathematics assessment: myths, models, good questions, and practical suggestions. NCTM, RestonGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmidt W, Prawat R (2006) Curriculum coherence and national control of education: issue or non-issue? J Curric Stud 38(6):641–658Google Scholar
  20. Schmidt W, Wang H, Mcknight C (2005) Curriculum coherence: an examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. J Curric Stud 37(5):525–559Google Scholar
  21. Sowell EJ (2005) Curriculum: an integrative introduction, 3rd edn. Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  22. Stein MK, Remillard JT, Smith MS (2007) How curriculum influences student learning. In: Lester FK (ed) Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Information Age, Greenwich, pp 319–369Google Scholar
  23. Talmage H (1985) Evaluating the curriculum: what, why and how. National Association for Secondary School PrincipalsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lebanese American UniversityBeirutLebanon