Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

2014 Edition
| Editors: Stephen Lerman

Ability Grouping in Mathematics Classrooms

  • Jo BoalerEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_145

Definitions

Ability means a certain amount of intelligence that individuals are thought to possess. Ability grouping is a generic term to encompass any grouping, whether it be within class or between classes, flexible or inflexible, that involves students being separated according to perceptions of their ability.

The term setting is used for grouping organization used in England whereby students attend different classes according to ideas of their ability. In primary schools there are typically 2–4 sets for mathematics; secondary schools may have as many as 10 sets. The varying sets move at a different pace and cover different mathematics content. Streaming is an older practice used in England whereby students were grouped by ability for all of their subjects together. This was used in secondary schools with students frequently being placed into streamed groups as soon as they started the schools. Tracking is an organizational practice used in the USA whereby different classes are...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Altendorff L (2012) An exploration of the ‘cultural script’ for teaching and learning mathematics in English secondary schools and its relationship with teacher change. Unpublished DPhil: University of SussexGoogle Scholar
  2. Blatchford P, Hallam S, Kutnick P, Creech A (2008) Classes, groups and transitions: structures for teaching and learning. Primary review research survey 9/2. University of Cambridge, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Boaler J (1997a) Setting, social class and survival of the quickest. Br Educ Res J 23(5):575–595Google Scholar
  4. Boaler J (1997b) When even the winners are losers: evaluating the experience of ‘top set’ students. J Curric Stud 29(2):165–182Google Scholar
  5. Boaler J (2002) Experiencing school mathematics: traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  6. Boaler J (2005) The ‘Psychological Prison’ from which they never escaped: the role of ability grouping in reproducing social class inequalities. FORUM 47(2&3):135–144Google Scholar
  7. Boaler J (2008) What’s math got to do with It? Helping children learn to love their least favorite subject – and why it’s important for America. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Boaler J (2012) From psychological imprisonment to intellectual freedom – the different roles that school mathematics can take in students’ lives. Paper presented at the 12th international congress on mathematical education, Seoul, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  9. Boaler J, Staples M (2008) Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: the case of Railside School. Teach Coll Rec 110(3):608–645Google Scholar
  10. Boaler J, Wiliam D, Brown M (2000) Students’ experiences of ability grouping – disaffection, polarization and the construction of failure. Br Educ Res J 26(5):631–648Google Scholar
  11. Bracey G (2003) Tracking, by accident and by design. Phi Delta Kappan 85:332–333Google Scholar
  12. Burris C, Heubert J, Levin H (2006) Accelerating mathematics achievement using heterogeneous grouping. Am Educ Res J 43(1):103–134Google Scholar
  13. Cohen E, Lotan R (eds) (1997) Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: sociological theory in practice. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Dweck CS (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Ballantine Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Hallam S, Toutounji I (1996) What do we know about the grouping of pupils by ability? A research review. University of London Institute of Education, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Linchevski L, Kutscher B (1998) Tell me with whom you’re learning and I’ll tell you how much you’ve learned: mixed ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics. J Res Math Educ 29:533–554Google Scholar
  17. Nunes T, Bryant P, Sylva K, Barros R (2009) Development of maths capabilities and confidence in primary school (vol Report RR118). DCSFGoogle Scholar
  18. Oakes J (1985) Keeping track: how schools structure inequality. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  19. Porter AC and associates (1994) Reform of high school mathematics and science and opportunity to learn. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  20. Sahlberg P (2011) Finnish lessons: what can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Series on school reform. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Slavin RE (1990) Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: a best evidence synthesis. Rev Educ Res 60(3):471–499Google Scholar
  22. Stigler J, Hiebert J (1999) The teaching gap: best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Zevenbergen R (2005) The construction of a mathematical habitus: implications of ability grouping in the middle years. J Curric Stud 37(5):607–619Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationStanford UniversityStanfordUSA