Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

2014 Edition
| Editors: Stephen Lerman

Sociological Approaches in Mathematics Education

  • Uwe GellertEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_142

Topic and History

Sociological approaches in mathematics education are those where sociological theory guides and directs research. In research on mathematics education, they have a rather short history. They are offering vigorous and fresh perspectives, and they have received increasing attention during the last 25 years. By using methods of empirical investigation and critical analysis, they engage with the complex relationships between individuals, groups, knowledge, discourse, and social practice, aiming at a theoretical understanding of social processes in mathematics education. These relationships are often conceived as tensions between the micro level of individual agency and interaction and the macro level of the social structure of society. The institutions of mathematics education and their functioning, often in terms of social reproduction, are of crucial concern.

Sociological approaches in mathematics education refer to a field of study and a body of knowledge that are not...

Keywords

Agency Critical analysis Control Curriculum Discourse Discrimination Empirical investigation Everyday knowledge Feminist perspectives Identity Ideology Institution Instructional mechanism Interaction Knowledge Linguistic habitus Mathematics textbooks Parental participation Phenomenology Social practice Social process Parental participation Social semiotics Stratification Structuralist perspectives 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bernstein B (2000) Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity, 2nd (rev.) edn. Rowman & Littlefield, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown A (2000) Positioning, pedagogy and parental participation in school mathematics: an exploration of implications for the public understanding of mathematics. Social Epistemol 14:21–31Google Scholar
  3. Cooper B, Dunne M (2000) Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge: social class, sex and problem-solving. Open University, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  4. Dowling P (1998) The sociology of mathematics education: mathematical myths/ pedagogical texts. RoutledgeFalmer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Ensor P, Galant J (2005) Knowledge and pedagogy: sociological research in mathematics education in South Africa. In: Vithal R, Adler J, Keitel C (eds) Researching mathematics education in South Africa: perspectives, practices and possibilities. HSRC, Cape Town, pp 281–306Google Scholar
  6. Gates P, Vistro-Yu CP (2003) Is mathematics for all? In: Bishop AJ, Clements MA, Keitel C, Kilpatrick J, Leung FKS (eds) Second international handbook of mathematics education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 31–73Google Scholar
  7. Gellert U, Jablonka E (2009) “I am not talking about reality”: word problems and the intricacies of producing legitimate text. In: Verschaffel L, Greer B, Van Dooren W, Mukhopadhyay S (eds) Words and worlds: modelling verbal descriptions of situations. Sense, Rotterdam, pp 39–53Google Scholar
  8. Gellert U, Jablonka E, Morgan C (2010) Proceedings of the sixth international Mathematics Education and Society conference, 2nd edn. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin. http://www.ewi-psy.fu-berlin.de/en/v/mes6/proceedings/index.html. Accessed 2 Aug 2012
  9. Jablonka E (2009) Sociological perspectives in research in mathematics education. In: Kaasila R (ed) Matematiikan ja luonnontieteiden: Proceedings of the 2008 symposium of the Finnish Mathematics and Science Education Research Association. University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, pp 35–67Google Scholar
  10. Keitel C, Damerow P, Bishop A, Gerdes P (eds) (1989) Mathematics, education, and society. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Lerman S (2000) The social turn in mathematics education research. In: Boaler J (ed) Multiple perspectives in mathematics teaching and learning. Ablex, Westport, pp 19–44Google Scholar
  12. Lubienski ST (2000) A clash of social class cultures? Students’ experiences in a discussion-intensive seventh-grade mathematics classroom. Elementary School J 100:377–403Google Scholar
  13. Matos JF, Valero P, Yakusawa K (2008) Proceedings of the fifth international Mathematics Education and Society conference. Centro de Investigação em Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon. http://pure.ltu.se/portal/files/2376304/Proceedings_MES5.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2012
  14. Morgan C, Tsatsaroni A, Lerman S (2002) Mathematics teachers’ positions and practices in discourses of assessment. Brit J Sociol Educ 23:445–461Google Scholar
  15. Skovsmose O (1994) Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  16. Skovsmose O, Greer B (eds) (2012) Opening the cage: critique and politics of mathematics education. Sense, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  17. Valero P (2009) What has power got to do with mathematics education? In: Ernest P, Greer B, Sriraman B (eds) Critical issues in mathematics education. IAP, Charlotte, pp 237–254Google Scholar
  18. Vithal R (2003) In search of a pedagogy of conflict and dialogue for mathematics education. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  19. Wiliam D, Bartholomew H, Reay D (2004) Assessment, learning and identity. In: Valero P, Zevenbergen R (eds) Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 43–61Google Scholar
  20. Zevenbergen R (2005) The construction of a mathematical habitus: implications of ability grouping in the middle years. J Curriculum Stud 37:607–619Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fachbereich Erziehungswissenschaft und PsychologieFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany