# Socioeconomic Class in Mathematics Education

**DOI:**https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_141

## Definition

Research on the relationship between social class and socioeconomic status and achievement in mathematics.

## Overview

In many countries around the world, a correlation is found between working class or low socioeconomic status (SES) and achievement in mathematics. Secada (1992) traces recognition of the connection between social class, race, ethnicity, and other characteristics, with achievement in education to the United States Supreme Court case of Brown versus Board of Education in 1954. The major work on achievement in mathematics and social characteristics was begun in the mid-to late 1980s and has been a focus of a growing body of work ever since, with new theoretical perspectives developing (Valero and Zevenbergen 2004) and with new forums for dissemination and publication (e.g., the Political Dimensions of Mathematics Education (PDME) conferences of the early 1990s, followed by the conferences of the Mathematics Education and Society (MES) group). Here, the focus will...

## Keywords

Social class Achievement Equity Assessment## References

- Alrø H, Skovsmose O (2002) Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection, critique. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Bernstein B (2000) Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. Theory, research, critique, revised edition. Rowman & Littlefield, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Boaler J (2003) Learning from teaching: exploring the relationship between reform curriculum and equity. J Res Math Educ 33(4):239–258Google Scholar
- Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a theory of practice (trans. R. Nice). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Brown v. Board of Education 347 U. S. Reports (17 May 1954): 483-500Google Scholar
- Cooper B, Dunne M (2000) Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge: social class, sex and problem-solving. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
- D’Ambrosio U (1985) Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learn Math 10(1):44–48Google Scholar
- D’Ambrosio U (2010) From Ea, through pythagoras, to Avatar: different settings for mathematics. In: Pinto MMF, Kawasaki TF (eds) Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol 1. Belo Horizonte, Brazil, pp 1–20Google Scholar
- Dowling P (1998) The sociology of mathematics education: mathematical myths/pedagogic texts. Falmer, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Dowling P (2001) Mathematics education in late modernity: beyond myths and fragmentation. In: Atweh B, Forgasz H, Nebres B (eds) Sociocultural research on mathematics education: an international perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 19–36Google Scholar
- Ellsworth E (1989) Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harv Educ Rev 59(3):297–324Google Scholar
- Frankenstein M (1983) Application of Paolo Freire’s epistemology. J Educ 165(4):315–339Google Scholar
- Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Gates P (2004) Going beyond belief systems: exploring a model for the social influence on mathematics teacher beliefs. Educ Stud Math 63(3):347–369Google Scholar
- Gutstein E (2009) Possibilities and challenges in teaching mathematics for social justice. In: Ernest P, Greer B, Sriraman B (eds) Critical issues in mathematics education. Information Age, Charlotte, pp 351–374Google Scholar
- Knijnik G (2000) Ethnomathematics and political struggles. In: Coben D, O’Donoghue J, Fitzsimmons G (eds) Perspectives on adults learning mathematics: research and practice. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 119–134Google Scholar
- Knipping C, Reid DA, Gellert U, Jablonka J (2008) The emergence of disparity in performance in mathematics classrooms. In: Matos JF, Valero P, Yasukawa K (eds) Proceedings of the fifth international mathematics education and society conference. Centro de Investigação em Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg University, Aalborg, pp 320–329Google Scholar
- Lawler BR (2005) Persistent iniquities: a twenty-year perspective on “Race, Sex, Socioeconomic Status, and Mathematics”. The Mathematics Educator, Monograph No. 1: 29–46Google Scholar
- Lerman S (2010) Theories of mathematics education: is plurality a problem? In: Sriraman B, English L (eds) Theories of mathematics education. Springer, New York, pp 99–110Google Scholar
- Lubienski ST (2000) Problem solving as a means toward mathematics for all: an exploratory look through a class lens. J Res Math Educ 31(4):454–482Google Scholar
- Morgan C, Tsatsaroni A, Lerman S (2002) Mathematics teachers’ positions and practices in discourses of assessment. Br J Sociol Educ 23(3):443–459Google Scholar
- Popkewitz T (2004) The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum: inscriptions and the fabrication of the child. Am Educ Res J 41(1):3–34Google Scholar
- Reyes LH, Stanic GMA (1988) Race, sex, socioeconomic status, and mathematics. J Res Math Educ 19(1):26–43Google Scholar
- Secada WG (1992) Race, ethnicity, social class, language, and achievement in mathematics. In: Grouws DA (ed) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York, pp 623–660Google Scholar
- Skovsmose O (1994) Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Teese R (2000) Academic success and social power: examinations and inequality. Melbourne University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Valero P, Zevenbergen R (eds) (2004) Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Vithal R, Skovsmose O (1997) The end of innocence: a critique of ‘Ethnomathematics’. Educ Stud Math 34(2):131–157Google Scholar
- Walshaw M (ed) (2004) Mathematics education within the postmodern. Information Age, GreenwichGoogle Scholar
- Wiliam D (2003) Constructing difference: assessment in mathematics education. In: Burton L (ed) Which way social justice in mathematics education? Praeger, Westport, pp 189–207Google Scholar
- Zevenbergen R (2001) Mathematics, social class, and linguistic capital: an analysis of mathematics classroom interactions. In: Valero P, Zevenbergen R (eds) Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 201–215Google Scholar