Advertisement

The Capability Approach as Guidance for Corporate Ethics

  • Georges Enderle
Reference work entry

Abstract

The article attempts to make the capability approach fruitful for corporate ethics (i.e., the ethics of business organizations) in two parts. The first part presents the capability approach. After a short historic overview of its development advanced by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, the question about an adequate informational basis for interpersonal comparisons is raised, and traditional answers of the utility-based and resource-based approaches are criticized. Against this backdrop, the essential elements of the capability approach, common to Sen and Nussbaum, are highlighted, and some foundational implications of Sen’s capability approach in particular are explained, followed by a few considerations on the limitations of the capability approach. The second part discusses the application of the capability approach to corporate ethics. Beginning with three basic assumptions on corporate ethics, the application includes a critique of “value-free” economics and other business disciplines and an enrichment of the notion of rationality. It stipulates a sensitivity to issues of poverty and distribution and elaborates on the focus on functionings and capabilities. The article ends with a few concluding remarks.

Keywords

Business ethics Capabilities Corporate ethics Ethics-related approach Functionings Human development Human rights Primary goods Inequality Informational basis Nussbaum Pareto criterion Poverty Rationality Rawls Self-interest Sen Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Report Utilitarianism Wealth creation 

References

  1. 1.
    Arrow KJ (1951/1963) Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruni L, Comim F, Pugno M (eds) (2008) Capabilities and happiness. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bunnin N, Tsui-James EP (eds) (2003) The Blackwell companion to philosophy, 2nd edn. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dachler HP, Enderle G (1989) Epistemological and ethical considerations in conceptualizing and implementing human resource management. J Bus Ethics 8(8):597–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Enderle G (ed) (1999) International business ethics: challenges and approaches. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Enderle G (2003) Business ethics. In: Bunnin N et al (eds), Blackwell, Oxford, pp 531–551Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Enderle G (2009) A rich concept of wealth creation beyond profit maximization and adding value. J Bus Ethics 84(Suppl 3):281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Enderle G (2010) Wealth creation in China and some lessons for development ethics. J Bus Ethics 96(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Enderle G et al (2011) What is long-term wealth creation and investing? In: Tencati A et al (eds) Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 114–131Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Enderle G (2012a) Some ethical explications of the UN-framework for business and human rights. In: Williams OF (ed) University of Notre Dame Press, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Enderle G (2012b) Defining goodness in business and economics. In: Hösle et al (eds) University of Notre Dame Press, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar BL, De Colle S (2010) Stakeholder theory. The state of the art. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hösle V, Stelluto D (eds) (2012) Dimensions of goodness. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Minus PM (ed) (1993) The ethics of business in a global economy. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morris CW (ed) (2010) Amartya Sen. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nussbaum MC (2011) Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nussbaum MC, Sen A (eds) (1993) The quality of life. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pressman S, Summerfield G (2000) The economic contributions of Amartya Sen. Rev Political Econ 12(1):89–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Putnam H (2000) The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stiglitz JE, Sen A, Fitoussi J-E (2009) Report on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr
  22. 22.
    Sen A (1977) Rational fools: a critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. In: Sen A (ed) 1982, Blackwell, Oxford, pp 84–106Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sen A (1981) Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sen A (1982) Choice, welfare and measurement. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sen A (1984) Resources, values and development. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sen A (1985) Commodities and capabilities. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sen A (1987) On ethics and economics. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sen A (1992) Inequality reexamined. Russell Sage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sen A (1993) Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum M et al (eds) Clarendon, Oxford, pp 30–53Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sen A (1993) Does business ethics make economic sense? In: Minus PM (ed) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 53–66. Also in Bus Ethics Q 3:1, 45–54Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sen A (1999) Economics, business principles, and moral sentiments. In: Enderle G (ed) University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 15–29. Also in Bus Ethics Q 7:3, 5–15Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sen A (2005) Human rights and capabilities. J Hum Dev 6(2):151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sen A (2008) The economics of happiness and capability. In: Bruni L et al (eds) Oxford University Press, New York, 16–27Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sen A (2009) The idea of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tencati A, Perrini F (eds) (2011) Business ethics and corporate sustainability. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    United Nations (2008) Promotion of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development. Protect, respect and remedy: a framework for business and human rights. Report of the special representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie, Eighth session, A/HRC/8/5. Human Rights CouncilGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    United Nations (2011) Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the united nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework. Report of the special representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie. Seventeenth session, A/HRC/17/31, Human Rights CouncilGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Viner J (1991) Essays on the intellectual history of economics. In: Irwin DA (ed) Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Werhane PH, Kelley SP, Hartman LP, Moberg DJ (2010) Alleviating poverty through profitable partnerships. Globalization, markets and economic well-being. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Williams OF (ed) (2012) Sustainable Development: The UN global compact, the millennium development goals and the common good. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre DameGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marketing, Mendoza College of BusinessUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations