Handbook of Risk Theory pp 1001-1027 | Cite as
Sociology of Risk
- 10 Citations
- 5.7k Downloads
Abstract
Risk is a relatively new object of sociological research, but this research field has grown rapidly over the last three decades. This chapter argues that the task of sociology is to contribute to risk research by emphasizing that risks are always situated in a social context and are necessarily connected to actors’ activities. Thus, sociology opposes the reification of risks, where risks are lifted out their social context and are dealt with as something uninfluenced by activities, technologies, and instruments that serve to map them. The chapter comprises four sections, the first being a general introduction. The next section presents a historical perspective on sociology and risk. It starts by briefly describing what sociology is, followed by a discussion of how the concept of risk becomes an object of sociological thought. The section ends by presenting and discussing three different sociological perspectives on risk, all providing different contributions. The third section focuses on current strands of sociological risk research. It starts by giving an overview of three different sociological approaches to risk: Mary Douglas’s cultural theory of social order, Ulrich Beck’s theory of reflexive modernization and the risk society, and Niklas Luhmann’s system theory. All three approaches conceptualize risk differently and make different contributions to the sociological study of risk. The review of these theories is followed by a presentation of five central discussions within the sociology of risk: risk governance, public trust, democracy and risk, the realism–constructivism debate, and governmentality and risk. Finally, the fourth section briefly presents some areas in need of further sociological research.
Keywords
Risk Management Risk Perception Social Constructivism Risk Communication Industrial SocietyReferences
- Amendola A (2001) Recent paradigms for risk informed decision making. Safety Sci 40(1):17–30Google Scholar
- Baldwin R, Cave M (1999) Understanding regulation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Bauman Z (1993) Postmodern ethics. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Bauman Z (2006) Liquid fear. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Beck U (1992) Risk society. Towards a new modernity. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Beck U (2002) A life of one’s own in a runaway world: individualization, globalization and politics. In: Beck U, Beck-Gernsheim E (eds) Individualization, institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. Sage, London, pp 22–29Google Scholar
- Beck U (2008) Living in the world risk society. Econ Soc 35:329–345Google Scholar
- Beck U, Beck-Gernsheim E (2002) Losing the traditional. Individualization and “precarious freedom”. In: Beck U, Beck-Gernsheim E (eds) Individualization. Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. Sage, London, pp 1–21Google Scholar
- Bickerstaff K, Walker G (2001) Public understandings of air pollution: the “localization” of environmental risk. Glob Environ Chang 11:133–145Google Scholar
- Bloor D (1976) Knowledge and social imagery. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Breakwell GM (2007) The psychology of risk. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Calhoun C, Gerteis J, Moody J, Pfaff S, Virk I (2007) Contemporary sociological theory, 2nd edn. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Callon M, Lascoumes P, Barthe Y (2009) Acting in an uncertain world: an essay on technical democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Dean M (1999) Risk, calculable and incalculable. In: Lupton D (ed) Risk and sociocultural theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 131–159Google Scholar
- Douglas M (1966) Purity and danger. An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Douglas M (1978) Cultural bias. Royal anthropological institute of Great Britain and Ireland, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Douglas M (1982) Introduction to grid/group analysis. In: Douglas M (ed) Essays in the sociology of perception. Routledge Kegan Paul, London, pp 1–8Google Scholar
- Douglas M (1992) Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Douglas M (1996) Thought styles: critical essays on good taste. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Durkheim E (1982) The rules of sociological method. Macmillan Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Eriksson B (1993) The first formulation of sociology. A discursive innovation of the 18th century. Eur J Sociol 34(2):251–276Google Scholar
- Ferguson A (1767/1996) Essay on the history of civil society. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Finucane M, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Flynn J, Satterfield T (2000) Gender, race and perceived risk: the “white male” effect. Health Risk Soc 2(2):159–172Google Scholar
- Foucault M (1991) Governmentality. In: Burchell G, Gordon C, Miller P (eds) The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, pp 87–104Google Scholar
- Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1990) Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Furedi F (2002) The culture of fear. Risk-taking and the morality of low expectation. Continuum, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Furedi F (2008) Fear and security: a vulnerability-led policy response. Soc policy adm 42(6):645–661Google Scholar
- Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Giddens A (1990) The consequences of modernity. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Giddens A (1994) Risk, trust and reflexivity. In: Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S (eds) Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Polity, Cambridge, pp 184–197Google Scholar
- Giddens A (1999) Runaway world. How globalization is reshaping our lives. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Gieryn TF (1999) Cultural boundaries of science: credibility on the line. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Gouldson A, Lidskog R, Wester-Herber M (2007) The battle for hearts and minds. Evolutions in organisational approaches to environmental risk communication. Environ Plann C 25(1):56–72Google Scholar
- Gutteling J, Wiegman O (1996) Exploring risk communication. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Hilgartner S (1992) The social construction of risk objects: or, how to pry open networks of risks. In: Short JF, Clarke L (eds) Organizations, uncertainties, and risk. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 39–53Google Scholar
- Hilgartner S (2000) Science on stage: expert advice as public drama. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- Hobbes T (1651/2005) Leviathan. Continuum, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Höijer B, Lidskog R, Uggla Y (2006) Facing dilemmas. Sense-making and decision-making in late modernity. Futures 38(3):350–366Google Scholar
- Hood C, Rothstein H, Baldwin R (2001) The government of risk. Understanding risk regulation regimes. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Howel D, Moffatt S, Prince H, Bush J, Dunn C (2002) Urban air quality in North-East England: exploring the influences on local views and perceptions. Risk Anal 22(1):121–130Google Scholar
- Hughes E, Kitzinger J, Murdock G (2006) The media and risk. In: Taylor-Gooby P, Zinn J (eds) Risk in social sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 250–270Google Scholar
- Hutter BM (2001) Regulation and risk. Occupational health and safety on the railways. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Hutter B, Power M (eds) (2005) Organizational encounters with risk. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Irwin A (2006) The politics of talk. Coming to terms with the “new” scientific governance. Soc Stud Sci 36(2):299–320Google Scholar
- Irwin A, Michael M (2003) Science, social theory and public knowledge. Open University Press, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
- Irwin A, Wynne B (eds) (1996) Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Jaeger CC, Renn O, Rosa EA, Webler T (2001) Risk, uncertainty and rational action. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Japp KP, Kusche I (2008) System theory and risk. In: Zinn J (ed) Social theories of risk and uncertainty. An introduction. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 76–105Google Scholar
- Jasanoff S (ed) (2004) States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Jasanoff S (2005) Designs of nature. Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Jasanoff S (2010) A new climate for society. Theory culture soc 27(2–3):233–253Google Scholar
- Kasperson RE (1992) The social amplification of risk: progess in developing an integrative framework of risk. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) Social theories of risk. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
- Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble R, Kasperson JX, Ratick S (1988) The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal 8(2):177–187Google Scholar
- Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Pidgeon N, Slovic P (2003) The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In: Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (eds) Social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–46Google Scholar
- Kemshall H (2006) Crime and risk. In: Taylor-Gooby P, Zinn J (eds) Risk in social sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 76–93Google Scholar
- Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) (1992) Social theories of risk. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
- Latour B (1993) We have never been modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Latour B (2004) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Levinson R, Thomas J (eds) (1997) Science today: problem or crisis? Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Lidskog R (1996) In science we trust? on the relation between scientific knowledge, risk consciousness and public trust. Acta Sociologica 39(1):31–56Google Scholar
- Lidskog R (2008) Scientised citizens and democratised science. Re-assessing the expert-lay divide. J risk res 11(1–2):69–86Google Scholar
- Lidskog R (2011) Regulating nature: public understanding and moral reasoning. Nature and Culture 6(2):149–167Google Scholar
- Lidskog R, Sundqvist G (2011) The science-policy-citizen dynamics in international environmental governance. In: Lidskog R, Sundqvist G (eds) Governing the air: science-policy-citizen dynamics in international environmental governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 323–359Google Scholar
- Lidskog R, Soneryd L, Uggla Y (2005) Knowledge, power and control: studying environmental regulation in late modernity. J Environ Policy Plann 7(2):89–106Google Scholar
- Lidskog R, Soneryd L, Uggla Y (2009) Transboundary risk governance. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Lidskog R, Uggla Y, Soneryd L (2011) Making transboundary risks governable: reducing complexity, constructing identities and ascribing capabilities. Ambio 40(2):111–120Google Scholar
- Löfstedt RE (2005) Risk management in post-trust societies. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Luhmann N (1984) Soziale systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a MGoogle Scholar
- Luhmann N (1989) Ecological communication. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Luhmann N (1993) Risk. A sociological theory. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Lupton D (1999) Introduction: risk and sociocultural theory. In: Lupton D (ed) Risk and sociocultural theory. Cambrdge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–11Google Scholar
- Marres N (2007) The issues deserve more credit: pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Soc Stud Sci 37(5):759–778Google Scholar
- Millar J (1771) Observations concerning the distinctions of rank in society. T Ewing, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
- Novas C, Rose N (2000) Genetic risk and the birth of the somatic individual. Econ Soc 29(4):485–513Google Scholar
- O’Malley P (2008) Risk and governmentality. In: Zinn JO (ed) Social theories of risk and uncertainty. An introduction. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 52–75Google Scholar
- Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (eds) (2003) Social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Power M (2007) Organized uncertainty. Designing a world of risk management. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Reith G (2009) Uncertain times: the notion of “risk” and the development of modernity. In: Löfstedt RE, Boholm Å (eds) The Earthscan reader on risk. Earthscan, London, pp 53–68Google Scholar
- Renn O (1998) Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges. J Risk Res 1(1):49–71Google Scholar
- Renn O (2008) Risk governance. Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Rosa EA (1998) Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk. J Risk Res 1(1):15–44Google Scholar
- Rose N (1993) Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Econ Soc 22:283–299Google Scholar
- Rose N (1996) Governing “advanced” liberal democracies. In: Barry A, Osborne T, Rose N (eds) Foucault and political reason. UCL Press, London, pp 37–64Google Scholar
- Rose N (1999) Powers of freedom: reframing political thought. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Rose N, Miller P (1992) Political power beyond the states: problematics of government. Br J Sociol 43(2):173–205Google Scholar
- Sjöberg L (2000) Perceived risk and tampering with nature. J Risk Res 3(4):353–367Google Scholar
- Slovic P (1987) Perceptions of risk. Science 236:280–285Google Scholar
- Slovic P, Peters E (1998) The importance of worldviews in risk perception. Risk Decis Policy 3(2):165–170Google Scholar
- Smith A (1776/2001) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nation. Random House International, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Starr C (1969) Social benefit versus technological risk. Science 165(3899):1232–1238Google Scholar
- Stehr N (2005) Knowledge politics. Governing the consequences of science and technology. Paradigm, BoulderGoogle Scholar
- Sundqvist G, Elam M (2010) Public involvement designed to circumvent public concern? The ‘participatory turn’ in European nuclear activities. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 1(4):203–229, Article 8Google Scholar
- Taylor-Gooby P, Zinn J (eds) (2006) Risk in social sciences. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A (1990) Cultural theory. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
- Todt O (2003) Designing trust. Futures 35:239–251Google Scholar
- Tulloch J (1999) Fear of crime and the media: sociocultural theories of risk. In: Lupton D (ed) Risk and sociocultural theory. Cambrdge University Press, Cambridge, pp 34–58Google Scholar
- Tulloch J, Lupton D (2003) Risk and everyday life. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Wester-Herber M (2004) Underlying concerns in land-use conflict: the role of place-identity in risk perception. Environ Sci Policy 7(2):109–116Google Scholar
- Wynne B (1992a) Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science. Public Underst Sci 1(3):281–304Google Scholar
- Wynne B (1992b) Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Glob Environ Chang 2(2):111–127Google Scholar
- Wynne B (1993) Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity. Public Underst Sci 2(4):321–337Google Scholar
- Wynne B (1995) Public understanding of science. In: Jasanoff S, Markle GE, Peterson JC, Pinch T (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 361–388Google Scholar
- Wynne B (1996) May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: Lash S, Szerszynsky B, Wynne B (eds) Risk, environment modernity. Towards a new ecology. Sage, London, pp 44–83Google Scholar
- Wynne B (2001) Creating public alienation. Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Sci cult 10(4):445–481Google Scholar
- Wynne B (2005) Risk as globalizing ‘democratic’ discourse? Framing subjects and citizens. In: Leach M, Scoones I, Wynne B (eds) Science and citizens. Globalization and the challenge of engagement. ZED Books, London, pp 66–82Google Scholar
- Wynne B (2010) Strange weather, again. Climate science as political art. Theor Cult Soc 27(2–3):289–305Google Scholar
- Zinn JO (2008) A comparison of sociological theorizing on risk and uncertainty. In: Zinn JO (ed) Social theories of risk and uncertainty. An introduction. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 168–210Google Scholar
- Zinn JO, Gooby-Taylor P (2006) Risk as an interdisciplinary research area. In: Taylor-Gooby P, Zinn J (eds) Risk in social science. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar