Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research

2014 Edition
| Editors: Alex C. Michalos

Easterlin Paradox

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_802



The Easterlin paradox is an empirical relationship observed between measures of overall  subjective well-being (such as  life satisfaction or  happiness) and income first noted by Richard Easterlin (1974). In Easterlin’s original article, he observed that, although higher incomes are associated with higher levels of happiness within a country, average levels of happiness for a country do not appear to increase over time in line with increases in average income. In other words, the rich are happier than the poor, but there is no evidence that countries increase in average happiness as they get richer.


In the original formulation of the paradox, Easterlin’s analysis was largely limited to one country (the USA) with only limited data available on other countries. Since then, better information has indicated a strong empirical relationship across countries, with wealthy countries having a higher average level of happiness. In fact, there...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access


  1. Angeles, L. (2011). A closer look at the Easterlin Paradox. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 67–73.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, A., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative Income, happiness, and Utility: An explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.Google Scholar
  3. Deaton, A. (2007). Income, ageing, health and wellbeing around the world: Evidence from the gallup world poll (NBER Working Paper 13317).Google Scholar
  4. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2008). Gross national happiness as an answer to the Easterlin Paradox? Journal of Development Economics, 86, 22–42.Google Scholar
  5. Diener, E., Kahneman, D., Tov, W., & Arora, R. (2010). Income’s association with judgments of life versus feelings. In E. Diener, J. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Easterlin, R. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 27(1), 35–47.Google Scholar
  8. Easterlin, R., Morgan, R., Switek, M., & Wang, F. (2012). China’s life satisfaction, 1990–2010. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(25), 9775–9780.Google Scholar
  9. Graham, C. (2011). Does more money make you happier? Why so much debate? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6, 219–239.Google Scholar
  10. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(38), 16489–16493.Google Scholar
  11. Sacks, D., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth (NBER working paper 16441).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.OECDParisFrance