Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research

2014 Edition
| Editors: Alex C. Michalos

Detroit Area Studies (DAS)

  • Robert W. MaransEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_714

Synonyms

Definition

The Detroit Area Study (DAS) was a practicum in survey research at the University of Michigan (UM) from 1952 to 2004. In 1951, Angus Campbell, the first director of UM’s relatively new Survey Research Center (SRC) put forth the idea of establishing a “Training and Research Laboratory in the Community” (i.e., the Detroit area). The laboratory would have three explicit purposes: (1) to provide a research facility through which basic research can be conducted by social scientists at the University of Michigan, (2) to provide an agency for training graduate students of the social sciences in basic research techniques, and (3) to make available social science data of value to the Detroit community.

Description

DAS was launched in 1951 with the help of a Ford Foundation grant secured by Ronald Freedman, a UM professor of sociology and colleague of Campbell (Freedman, 1953). The first DAS was conducted in 1952 under the direction of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alwin, D. F. (1984). Trends in parental socialization values: Detroit, 1958 to 1983. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 359–382.Google Scholar
  2. Alwin, D. F. (1986). Religion and parental child-rearing orientations: Evidence of a Catholic-Protestant convergence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 412–440.Google Scholar
  3. Couper, M. O., Clemens, J., & Powers, K. (2002). Detroit areas study 1952–2001: Celebrating 50 years. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  4. Duncan, O. D., Schuman, H., & Duncan, B. (1973). Social change in a metropolitan community. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Freedman, R. (1953). The Detroit area study: A training and research laboratory in the community. American Journal of Sociology, 59, 30–33.Google Scholar
  6. Hamilton, V. L., & Sanders, J. (1992). Everyday justice: Responsibility and the individual in Japan and the United States. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. ICPSR. (n.d.). Detroit area studies series. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/series/00151. Accessed 25 February 2013.
  8. Krysan, M., & Bader, M. (2007). Perceiving the metropolis: Seeing the city through a prism of race. Social Forces, 86(2), 699–733.Google Scholar
  9. Marans, R. W., & Kweon, B. S. (2011). The quality of life in metro detroit at the beginning of the millennium. In R. W. Marans & R. Stimson (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life: Theory, methods, and empirical research. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA