Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research

2014 Edition
| Editors: Alex C. Michalos

Coping with an Unjust World

  • Michèlle Bal
  • Kees van den Bos
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_4121

Synonyms

Definition

Just-world theory (Lerner, 1980) proposed that people have a fundamental need to believe that the world is a just place. According to the theory, people have therefore developed several strategies to cope with unjust events, ranging from helping to blaming victims of injustice. Subsequent research has identified additional ways in which people can cope with an unjust world (e.g., compensatory rationalizations and immanent justice reasoning).

Description

Belief in a Just World

 Justiceis one of people’s and society’s core values. People generally strive to do the right thing and greatly value being treated fairly. Moreover, rules of justice are pivotal to the functioning of most, if not all, societies. Yet, people are confronted with injustice on a daily basis. These events do not only entail the grave injustices we see on the news, such as wars and hunger, but also encompass individual...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bal, M., & Van den Bos, K. (2010). The role of perpetrator similarity in reactions toward innocent victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 957–969. doi:10.1002/ejsp. 668.Google Scholar
  2. Bal, M., & Van den Bos, K. (2012). Blaming for a better future: Future orientation and associated intolerance of personal uncertainty lead to harsher reactions toward innocent victims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 835–844. doi:10.1177/0146167212442970.Google Scholar
  3. Bègue, L., & Bastounis, M. (2003). Two spheres of belief in justice: Extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world. Journal of Personality, 71, 435–463. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.7103007.Google Scholar
  4. Callan, M. J., Ellard, J. H., & Nicol, J. E. (2006). The belief in a just world and immanent justice reasoning in adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1646–1658. doi:10.1177/0146167206292236.Google Scholar
  5. Callan, M. J., Kay, A. C., Davidenko, N., & Ellard, J. (2009). The effects of justice motivation on memory for self- and other-relevant events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 614–623. doi:10.1016/j.jesp. 2009.02.013.Google Scholar
  6. Callan, M. J., Shead, N. W., & Olson, J. M. (2009). Foregoing the labor for the fruits: The effect of just world threat on the desire for immediate monetary rewards. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 246–249. doi:10.1016/j.jesp. 2008.08.013.Google Scholar
  7. Callan, M. J., Sutton, R. M., & Dovale, C. (2010). When deserving translates into causing: The effects of cognitive load on immanent justice reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1097–1100. doi:10.1016/j.jesp. 2010.05.024.Google Scholar
  8. Correia, I., & Vala, J. (2003). When will a victim be secondarily victimized? The effects of observer’s belief in a just world, victim’s innocence and persistence of suffering. Social Justice Research, 16, 379–400. doi:0885-7466/03/1200-0379/0.Google Scholar
  9. Correia, I., Vala, J., & Aguiar, P. (2001). The effects of belief in a just world and victim’s innocence on secondary victimization, judgements of justice and deservingness. Social Justice Research, 14, 327–342. doi:0885-7466/01/0900-0327/0.Google Scholar
  10. Correia, I., Vala, J., & Aguiar, P. (2007). Victim’s innocence, social categorization, and the threat to the belief in a just world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 31–38. doi:10.1016/j.jesp. 2005.12.010.Google Scholar
  11. Dalbert, C. (1998). Belief in a just world, well-being, and coping with an unjust fate. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 87–105). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  12. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x.Google Scholar
  13. Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00072-7.Google Scholar
  14. Gaucher, D., Hafer, C., Kay, A. C., & Davidenko, N. (2010). Compensatory rationalizations and the resolution of everyday underserved outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 109–118. doi:10.1177/0146167209351701.Google Scholar
  15. Hafer, C. L. (2000a). Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 165–173. doi:10.1037//0011-3514.79.2.165.Google Scholar
  16. Hafer, C. L. (2000b). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1059–1073. doi:10.1177/01461672002611004.Google Scholar
  17. Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.128.Google Scholar
  18. Jost, J., & Banaji, M. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x.Google Scholar
  19. Jost, J., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x.Google Scholar
  20. Kay, A. C., Capliński, S., & Jost, J. (2009). Left-right ideological differences in system justification following exposure to complementary versus noncomplementary stereotype exemplars. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 290–298. doi:10.1002/ejsp. 500.Google Scholar
  21. Kay, A. C., & Friesen, J. (2011). On social stability and social change: Understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 360–364. doi:10.1177/0963721411422059.Google Scholar
  22. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Friesen, J., Laurin, K., Zanna, M. P., et al. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to view what is as what should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421–434. doi:10.1037/a0015997.Google Scholar
  23. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of ‘poor but happy’ and ‘poor but honest’ stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823.Google Scholar
  24. Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim-derogation and victim-enhancement as alternate routes to system-justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240–246. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00810.x.Google Scholar
  25. Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Social disadvantage and the self-regulatory function of justice beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 149–171. doi:10.1037/a0021343.Google Scholar
  26. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00591.x.Google Scholar
  27. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lipkus, I. M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for other: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–677. doi:10.1177/0146167296227002.Google Scholar
  29. Martin, L. L. (1999). I-D compensation theory: Some implications of trying to satisfy immediate-return needs in a delayed-return culture. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 195–208.Google Scholar
  30. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283. doi:10.1037/h0035002.Google Scholar
  31. Otto, K., & Dalbert, C. (2005). Belief in a just world and its functions for young prisoners. Journal of Research in Personality, 6, 559–573. doi:10.1016/j.jrp. 2005.01.004.Google Scholar
  32. Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2005). Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the self-other distinction in just-world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 637–345. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.010.Google Scholar
  33. Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M., Wilkin, K., Elder, T. J., Cole, J. M., & Stathi, S. (2008). Justice for whom, exactly? Beliefs in justice for the self and various others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 528–541. doi:10.1177/0146167207312526.Google Scholar
  34. Van Prooijen, J. W., & Van den Bos, K. (2009). We blame innocent victims more than I do: Self-construal level moderated responses to just-world threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1528–1539. doi:10.1177/0146167209344728.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social PsychologyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands