Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research

2014 Edition
| Editors: Alex C. Michalos

Generalizability Theory

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1151

Definition

Measurement is a multifacet operation. The measurement framework of generalizability theory has the capacity of estimating construct-based parameters as well as other effects operating in the measurement situation. This implies that the measurement model of generalizability theory goes beyond the well-known and frequently applied one-facet model of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Thus, the generalizability framework represents a far more realistic approach to measurement than Cronbach’s alpha. Major contributions to generalizability theory have been offered by its originators Cronbach, Gleser, Nanda, and Rajaratnam (1972) and Cronbach (2004) and later by Brennan (2001) and Cardinet, Tourneur, and Allal (1976, 1981), among others.

Description

Generalizability Theory

According to classical test theory, an observed score is assumed to consist of a “true” and an undifferentiated error score. Applied measurement designs may often involve a blend of different types of error....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Cardinet, J., Tourneur, Y., & Allal, L. (1976). The symmetry of generalizability theory: Applications to educational measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13, 119–135.Google Scholar
  3. Cardinet, J., Tourneur, Y., & Allal, L. (1981). Extension of generalizability theory and its applications in measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18, 183–204.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, M.-L., & Hu, L.-C. (2002). The generalizability of Caregiver Strain Index in family caregivers of cancer patients. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 39, 823–829.Google Scholar
  5. Christophersen, K.-A., Helseth, S., & Lund, T. (2008). A generalizability study of the Norwegian version of KINDLR in a sample of healthy adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 17, 87–93.Google Scholar
  6. Cronbach, L. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 391–418.Google Scholar
  7. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Hagtvet, K. A., Man, F., & Sharma, S. (2001). Generalizability of self-related cognitions in test anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1147–1171.Google Scholar
  9. Van Agt, H. M. E., Essink-Bot, M.-L., Krabbe, P. F. M., & Bonsel, G. J. (1994). Test-retest reliability of health state valuation collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. Social Science & Medicine, 39, 1537–1544.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFaculty of Social Sciences, University of OsloOsloNorway