Advertisement

Killer Robots: Ethical Issues in the Design of Unmanned Systems for Military Applications

  • Robert SparrowEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

Unmanned systems in military applications will often play a role in determining the success or failure of combat missions and thus in determining who lives and dies in times of war. Designers of UMS must therefore consider ethical, as well as operational, requirements and limits when developing UMS. The ethical issues involved in UMS design may be grouped under two broad headings: Building Safe Systems and Designing for the Law of Armed Conflict. This paper identifies and discusses a number of issues under each of these headings and offers some analysis of the implications of each issue and how it might be addressed.

Keywords

Armed Conflict Psychological Distance Weapon System Unmanned Surface Vehicle Commanding Officer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research for this paper was supported by the Australian Research Council, through the award of an ARC Discovery Grant (DP0770545) to Dr Jessica Wolfendale, Professor Tony Coady, and Dr Robert Sparrow. The author would like to thank Neil McKinnon for assistance with locating sources for this paper and with preparing it for publication. The author would also like to thank Jessica Wolfendale, Linda Barclay, Jim Sparrow, John Canning, and Ron Arkin for comments and discussion which have improved this paper.

References

  1. T.K. Adams, Future warfare and the decline of human decision-making. Parameters: U.S. Army War College Quarterly (Winter, 2001–2), 57–71 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous, Defense sector accused of muscling in on robots. Prof. Eng. 20(3), 8 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. R.C. Arkin, Governing lethal behaviour: embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture. Technical report GIT-GVU-07-11 for US Army. Mobile Robot Laboratory, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology (2007). Available at http://www.cc.gatech.edu/ai/robot-lab/online-publications/formalizationv35.pdfat25.10.07
  4. R.C. Arkin, Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots (Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. P.M. Asaro, Robots and responsibility from a legal prospective, in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Roma, 2007Google Scholar
  6. E. Baard, Make robots not war: some scientists refuse to get paid for killer ideas. The Village Voice, 10–16 Sept 2003, pp. 39–44Google Scholar
  7. C.L. Barry, E. Zimet, UCAVs – technological, policy, and operational challenges. Defense Horizons (3) (2001)Google Scholar
  8. C. Beal, Briefing: autonomous weapons systems – brave new world. Jane's Def. Wkly. 33(6), 22–26 (2000)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. B. Bender, Attacking Iraq, from a Nev. Computer. Boston Globe, 3 Apr 2005, A6Google Scholar
  10. T. Blackmore, Dead slow: unmanned aerial vehicles loitering in battlespace. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 25(3), 195–214 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Boland, Developing reasoning robots for today and tomorrow. Signal 61(6), 43–46 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. A. Butler, Global Hawk UAV supports border ops in Iraq. Aviat. Week Space Technol. 166(11), 56 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. J.S. Canning, A Definitive Work on Factors Impacting the Arming of Unmanned Vehicles (Dahlgren Division Naval Surface Warfare Centre, Washington, D.C., 2005)Google Scholar
  14. J.S. Canning, A concept of operations for armed autonomous systems, in 3rd Annual Disruptive Technology Conference, Washington, D.C., 6–7 Sept 2006Google Scholar
  15. J. Card, Killer machines. Foreign Policy (May/June): 92 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. Col. R.E. Chapman, Unmanned combat aerial vehicles: dawn of a new age? Aerosp. Power J 16(2), 60–73 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. M. Coeckelbergh, Drones, information technology, and distance: mapping the moral epistemology of remote fighting. Ethics Inf. Technol. 15(2), 87–98 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. M.L. Cummings, Creating moral buffers in weapon control interface design. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 23(3), 28–33, 41 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. M.L. Cummings, Automation and accountability in decision support system interface design. J. Technol. Stud. 32(1), 23–31 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. J.G. Dalton, Future navies – present issues. Nav. War Coll. Rev. 59, 17–39 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. S.B. Donnelly, Long-distance warriors. Time Magazine, 4 Dec 2005Google Scholar
  22. C.J. Dunlap Jr., Technology: recomplicating moral life for the nation's defenders. Parameters: US Army War College Quarterly (Autumn) 29, 24–53 (1999)Google Scholar
  23. J. Excell, Unmanned aircraft: out of the shadows. The Engineer, 18 Jan 2007Google Scholar
  24. S. Featherstone, The coming robot army. Harper's Magazine, 43–52 (2007)Google Scholar
  25. M. Fielding, Robotics in future land warfare. Aust. Army J. 3(2), 1–10 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. J.R. Fitzsimonds, T.G. Mahnken. Military officer attitudes toward UAV adoption: exploring institutional impediments to innovation. Joint Force Q. 46, 96–103 (2007)Google Scholar
  27. Lt. Col. J. Foster, Ricochets and replies: first rule of modern warfare. Air and Space Power J. (Spring 2006)Google Scholar
  28. D.A. Fulghum, Predator's progress. Aviat. Week Space Technol. 158(9), 48–50 (2003)Google Scholar
  29. S. Graham, America's robot army. New Statesman 135(4796), 12–15 (2006)Google Scholar
  30. M. Guarini, P. Bello. Robotic warfare: some challenges in moving from noncivilian to civilian theaters, in Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, ed. by P. Lin, K. Abney, G.A. Bekey (MIT, Cambridge/London, 2012), pp. 129–144Google Scholar
  31. H. Gulam, S.W. Lee, Uninhabited combat aerial vehicles and the law of armed conflict. Aust. Army J. 3(2), 1–14 (2006)Google Scholar
  32. D. Hambling, Military builds robotic insects. Wired Magazine, 23 Jan 2007. Available at http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2007/01/72543
  33. C.J. Hanley, Robot-aircraft attack squadron bound for Iraq. Aviation.com, 16 July 2007Google Scholar
  34. C.M. Hockmuth, UAVs – the next generation. Air Force Magazine Feb 2007, pp. 70–74Google Scholar
  35. S. Kainikara, UCAVs probable lynchpins of future air warfare. Asia-Pac. Def. Rep. 28(6), 42–45 (2002)Google Scholar
  36. R.D. Kaplan, Hunting the Taliban in Las Vegas. Atlantic Monthly, 4 Aug 2006Google Scholar
  37. H.S. Kenyon, Israel deploys robot guardians. Signal 60(7), 41–44 (2006)Google Scholar
  38. H.S. Kenyon, Airborne testbed opens new possibilities. Signal 61(9), 47–49 (2007)Google Scholar
  39. A. Kochan, Automation in the sky. Ind. Robot 32(6), 468–471 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. A.J. Lazarski, Legal implications of the uninhabited combat aerial vehicle. Air Space Power J. 16(2), 74–83 (2002)Google Scholar
  41. W. Legien, C.-J. Andersson, G. Hansen, UUV and USV: which ‘unmanned’ for what task? Nav. Forces 27(3), 44–51 (2006)Google Scholar
  42. P. Lerner, Robots go to war. Pop. Sci. 268(1), 42–96 (2006)Google Scholar
  43. G. Marchant, R. Arkin, E.T. Barrett, J. Borenstein, L.M. Gaudet, O. Kittrie, P. Lin, G.R. Lucas, R. O’Meara, International governance of autonomous military robots. Columbia Univ. Rev. Sci. Technol. Law 12, 272–315 (2011)Google Scholar
  44. D. Marino, G. Tamburrini, Learning robots and human responsibility. Int. Rev. Inf. Ethics 6, 47–51 (2006)Google Scholar
  45. P. Marks, Armchair warfare. New Sci. 192(2575), 24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. J.P. Masey, Towards an unmanned navy: the growing world of UAV, UCAV, USV and UUV. Nav. Forces 27(6), 23–31 (2006)Google Scholar
  47. A. Matthias, The responsibility gap: ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics Inf. Technol. 6, 175–183 (2004)Google Scholar
  48. J.W. McMains, The marine corps robotics revolution. Mar. Corps Gaz. 88(1), 34–37 (2004)Google Scholar
  49. C. Mitcham, The spectrum of ethical issues associated with the military support of science and technology, in Ethical Issues Associated with Scientific and Technological Research for the Military, ed. by C. Mitcham, P. Siekevitz. Volume 577 of Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 1989)Google Scholar
  50. J. Mustin, Future employment of unmanned aerial vehicles. Air and Space Power J. 16(2), 86–97 (2002)Google Scholar
  51. Office of the Secretary of Defense, Joint Robotics Program Master Plan FY2005: Out Front in Harm's Way (Office of the Undersecretary of Defense (AT&L) Defense Systems/Land Warfare and Munitions, Washington, D.C., 2005a)Google Scholar
  52. Office of the Secretary of Defense, Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap: 2005–2030 (Department of Defense, U.S. Government, Washington, D.C., 2005b)Google Scholar
  53. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, Development and Utilisation of Robotics and Unmanned Ground Vehicles: Report to Congress (Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, Portfolio Systems Acquisition, Land Warfare and Munitions, Joint Ground Robotics Enterprise, Washington, D.C., 2006)Google Scholar
  54. Office of the Secretary of Defense, Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap FY2011-2036 (Department of Defense, U.S. Government, Washington, D.C., 2012)Google Scholar
  55. G.I. Peterson, Unmanned vehicles: changing the way to look at the battlespace. Nav. Forces 26(4), 29–38 (2005)Google Scholar
  56. H.M. Roff, Responsibility, liability, and lethal autonomous robots, in Routledge Handbook of Ethics and War: Just War Theory in the 21st Century, ed. by F. Allhoff, N.G. Evans, A. Henschke (Routledge, Abingdon/New York, 2013), pp. 352–364Google Scholar
  57. Royal Australian Air Force, AAP 1003 – Operations Law for RAAF Commanders, 2nd edn. (Air Power Development Centre, Canberra, 2004)Google Scholar
  58. M.N. Schmitt, Precision attack and international humanitarian law. Int. Rev. Red Cross 87(859), 445–466 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. R. Scarborough, Special report: unmanned warfare. Washington Times, 8 May 2005Google Scholar
  60. N. Shachtman, Attack of the drones. Wired Magazine 13(6) (2005a). Available at http://www.wired.com/wired/archive//13.06/drones_pr.htmal, at 25.08.05
  61. N. Shachtman, Drone school, a ground's-eye view. Wired Magazine, 27 May 2005b. Available at http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2005/05/67655 at 17.9.07
  62. J. Sherman, The drone wars. Bull. At. Sci. 61(5), 28–37 (2005)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  63. D.K. Shurtleff, The effects of technology on our humanity. Parameters: US Army War College Quarterly (Summer), 100–112 (2002)Google Scholar
  64. P.W. Singer, Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and 21st Century Conflict (The Penguin Press, New York, 2009)Google Scholar
  65. R. Sparrow, Killer robots. J. Appl. Philos. 24(1), 62–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. R. Sparrow, Predators or plowshares? Arms control of robotic weapons. IEEE Technol. Soc. 28(1), 25–29 (Spring 2009)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  67. R. Sparrow, Robotic weapons and the future of war, in New Wars and New Soldiers: Military Ethics in the Contemporary World, ed. by J. Wolfendale, P. Tripodi (Ashgate, Surrey/Burlington, 2011), pp. 117–133Google Scholar
  68. R. Sparrow, Just say no’ to drones. IEEE Technol. Soc. 31(1), 56–63 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. R. Sparrow, War without virtue? in Killing by Remote Control, ed. by B.J. Strawser (Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 2013), pp. 84–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. B.J. Strawser, Moral predators: the duty to employ uninhabited aerial vehicles. J. Mil. Ethics 9(4), 342–368 (2010)Google Scholar
  71. J.M. Sullivan, Evolution or revolution? The rise of UAVs. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 25(3), 43–49 (Fall 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Col. R. Szafranski, The first rule of modern warfare: never bring a knife to a gunfight. Air and Space Power J. 19(4), 19–26 (2005)Google Scholar
  73. R.L. Thorton Jr. Captain, The case for robots in the SBCTs (now). Infantry 94(1), 33–41 (2005)Google Scholar
  74. D.L. Ulin, When robots do the killing. Los Angeles Times, 30 Jan 2005Google Scholar
  75. G. Veruggio, EURON Roboethics Roadmap (European Robotics Research Network, Genoa, 2006)Google Scholar
  76. G. Veruggio, F. Operto, Roboethics: social and ethical implications of robotics. Springer Handbook of Robotics, eds. B. Siciliano, O. Khatib (Springer, Berlin, 2006), pp. 1499–1524Google Scholar
  77. R. Wall, Reality check. Aviat. Week Space Technol. 165(5), 33 (2006)Google Scholar
  78. J. Wise, No pilot, no problem. Pop. Mech. 184(4), 64 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMonash UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations