Advertisement

Succession in Ecological Education

  • David J. Gibson
  • Beth A. Middleton
Reference work entry

Abstract

As complex and dynamic systems, wetlands offer the opportunity to investigate and incorporate the ecological concept of succession in educational settings. For example, the well-known, classic hydrosere concept is illustrated in numerous ecology and life-science textbooks. In this chapter, the drawbacks of using the hydrosere successional concept are assessed, and two examples of using wetlands to illustrate the process of succession for educational purposes are described. In each case, the premise and approach is that students best “learn ecology by doing ecology.”

Keywords

Education Succession Wetlands 

References

  1. Anderson S, Moss B. How wetland habitats are perceived by children: consequences for children’s education and wetland conservation. Int J Sci Ed. 1993;51:473–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barko VA, Burke BA, Gibson DJ, Middleton BA. Seedling growth of Wisconsin fast plants (Brassica rapa) in field environments.. In: Teaching issues and experiments in ecology, Volume I, January 2004. (C. D’Avanzo & B.W. Grant, editors). ESA EdWeb, Ecological Society of America, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  3. Bhattacharyya S. An evaluation of an inquiry-based field laboratory. MS thesis, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; 1999.Google Scholar
  4. Gibson DJ. Textbook misconceptions: the climax concept of succession. Amer Biol Teacher. 1996;58:135–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibson DJ, Middleton BA, Saunders GW, Mathis M, Weaver WT, Neely J, Rivera J, Oyler M. Learning ecology by doing ecology. Amer Biol Teacher. 1999;61:217–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gibson DJ, Middleton BA, Foster K, Honu YAK, Hoyer EW, Mathis MJ. Species frequency dynamics in an old-field succession: effects of disturbance, fertilization and scale. J Veg Sci. 2005;16:415–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson EA, Miyanishi K. Testing the assumptions of chronosequences in succession. Ecol Lett. 2008;11:419–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Klinger LF. The myth of the classic hydrosere model of bog succession. Arctic Alpine Res. 1996;28:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mathis MJ. Deer herbivory and old field succession. PhD Dissertation, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; 2001.Google Scholar
  10. Middleton BA. Succession and herbivory in monsoonal wetlands. Wetl Ecol Manag. 1999;6:189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitsch WJ, Tejada J, Nahlik A, Kohlmann B, Bernal B, Hernández CE. Tropical wetlands for climate change research, water quality management and conservation education on a university campus in Costa Rica. Ecol Eng. 2008;34:276–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mitsch WJ, Zhang L, Stefanik KC, Nahlik AM, Anderson CJ, Bernal B, Hernandez M, Song K. Creating wetlands: primary succession, water quality changes, and self-design over 15 years. Bioscience. 2012;62:237–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neiring WA. Vegetation dynamics (succession and climax) in relation to plant community management. Conserv Biol. 1987;1:287–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Niering WA. Wetland vegetation change: a dynamic process. Wetl J. 1994;6:6–15.Google Scholar
  15. Oyler M, Rivera J, Roffel M, Gibson DJ, Middleton BA, Mathis M. The macaroni lab: A directed inquiry project on predator-prey relationships. Amer Biol Teacher. 1999;61:39–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rice MR, Middleton BA, Gibson DJ. Fractal analysis of movement pathways of earthworms in vegetated and unvegetated landscapes. Bioscience. 1999;69:176–84.Google Scholar
  17. van der Valk AG. Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecology. 1981;62:688–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Walker LR, Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Clarkson BD. The use of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development. J Ecol. 2010;98:725–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant BiologyCenter for Ecology, Southern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyWetland and Aquatic Research CenterLafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations