Advertisement

The Wetland Book pp 1245-1252 | Cite as

Soft Engineering for Coastal Protection: Natural Hazard Regulation

  • Jasper L. Fiselier
Reference work entry

Abstract

Coastal wetlands, beaches and dunes have always played a role in the protection of coastal lowlands. Using their capability to attenuate waves and prevent erosion has gained more momentum in recent years. Critical to their design is an understanding how different parts of the coastal system function as one coastal protection system, with sediment sources and pathways as their basis. A dune depends on its beach, and salt marshes and mangroves depend on a muddy foreshore. Natural systems perform well under natural conditions, but less in the case of extreme storms. Combinations of soft and hard structures may provide the optimized design needed. It is important to design and value soft defenses as multifunctional assets in coastal development and to realign their design to the needs of local communities, so they are fully integrated and their management and long-term presence can be safeguarded. A major challenge is to convince engineers, that there are ‘hard’ arguments for using soft defenses so they are regarded as an engineering challenge.

Keywords

Soft defenses Dunes Salt marshes Mangroves 

References

  1. Booij N, Holthuijsen LH, RC Ris. The SWAN wave model for shallow water, Proc. 1996, 25th Int. Conf. Coastal Eng., Orlando, USA, Vol. 1, pp. 668–676.Google Scholar
  2. Erchinger HF. Saltmarsh Management in Respect of Coastal Protection Demands in Niedersachsen. In: Proceedings of the second trilateral working conference on Saltmarsh management in the Wadden Sea Region; 1989. p. 73–7.Google Scholar
  3. Gedan KB, Kirwan ML, Wolanski E, Barbier EB, Silliman BR, The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: Answering recent challenges to the paradigm. Climatic Change. Climatic Change. 2010;106(1):7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haslett SK. Coastal systems. London [etc.]: Routledge; 2009.Google Scholar
  5. Hofstede JLA. Integrated management of artificially created salt marshes in the Wadden Sea of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. Wetl Ecol Manage. 2003;11(3):183–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. King SE, Lester JN. The value of salt marsh as a sea defence. Mar Pollut Bull. 1995;30(3):180–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Möller I, Kudella M, Rupprecht F, Spencer T, Paul M, van Wesenbeeck BK, Wolters G, Jensen K, Bouma TJ, Miranda-Lange M, Schimmels S. Wave attenuation over coastal salt marshes under storm surge conditions. Nature Geoscience. 2014;7(10):727–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Möller I. Quantifying salt marsh vegetation and its effect on wave height dissipation: results from a UK East coast saltmarsh. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2006;69(3-4):337–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shepard CC, Crain CM, Beck MW. The protective role of coastal marshes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plosone 6(11): e27374. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027374CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. van Loon-Steensma JM, Slim PA, Vroom J, Stapel J, Oost AP. Een Dijk van een Kwelder.Een verkenning naar de golfreducerende werking van kwelders. Alterra-rapport 2267; 2013. ISSN 1566-7197Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Royal Haskoning DHVAmersfoortThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations